Re: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-27 Thread Nic Wise
> > RAD, like thin, has many definitions. For mine (which may or may not > qualify as yours), if a customer comes in and says, I would like you to use > "ZYX" font which is standard in out 100K person organisation, for HTML, it > is just a simple matter of adding a line, . If different clients

RE: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-27 Thread Phil Scadden
> Better still, have an HTML specialist design you web pages, and have a > programmer do the program. I have seem many applications that work fine, > but have very poor UI - classic case of one designed by programmers. Its > hard to find good programmers who are also good UI designers, and vice

RE: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-27 Thread Dennis Chuah
> OK, fine - it may not fit your definition of "thin" (I'll > give mine later, > which are just as 'valid' (or not :) ) as yours), but IMO, > and HTML front > end does not come even close to fitting the definition of > RAD, which for me > would be much more important. RAD, like thin, has many de

Re: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-27 Thread Nic Wise
> > Actually, where I am right now, we have someone specializing > > certainly not thinner if using client side cursors. > > Hmmm ... doesn't sound like a very thin solution to me OK, fine - it may not fit your definition of "thin" (I'll give mine later, which are just as 'valid' (or not :

RE: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-27 Thread Dennis Chuah
> Actually, where I am right now, we have someone specializing > in using ADO, > and this person has been spending more than 12 hours so far trying to > install ADO (without installing Delphi!) onto a Clients > machine. Right now > he is looking pretty pissed with ADO! Personally I have tried it

Re: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-26 Thread Tony Blomfield
_Server connected to an Oracle backend. Our App_Server does have Web Clients as well as traditional Gui Clients. Cheers... -Original Message- From: Neven MacEwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thursday, 27 January 2

RE: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-26 Thread Dennis Chuah
> I've not had any problems with ADO on 95/98/2000 > > The question is if 2000 ships with ADO built in does it > immediately become > thin? and define thin anyway! > The last thin piece of software I used was sidekick 2.0 My definition of thin is this (in order or importance): 1. No client sid

Re: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-26 Thread Neven MacEwan
Original Message - From: Tony Blomfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2000 12:11 Subject: Re: [DUG]: ADO access > Interesting Comments Denis. > > Actually, where I am right now, we have someone special

Re: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-26 Thread Tony Blomfield
really a bit over the top. Just my thoughts... Tony. -Original Message- From: Dennis Chuah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Multiple recipients of list delphi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, 26 January 2000 8:40 AM Subject: RE: [DUG]: ADO access Terry, BDE SQL Links to S

Re: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-25 Thread Neven MacEwan
Terry I am happily using ADOExpress (purchased as an add on to D5 Pro) with MSSQL 7 (and MSDE) A few pointers - Base your DB Access on Queries not Tables - Dont try to simply use the Query, Table and Stored Proc as replacements for the BDE components - they are diffent enough to trip you up i.e.

RE: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-25 Thread Dennis Chuah
Terry, BDE SQL Links to SQL Server is basically stuffed. If you must use BDE, go the ODBC way - this way, you only need the professional version. As for ADO, you don't need ADOExpress unless you want you use data aware controls (who needs them?). As for BDE/ADO, both work equally well (becaus

RE: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-25 Thread Grant Black
Why not just suck it & see - you can download a 3rd party ADO component set like Adonis and try and see if it works for you. See: http://www.cybermagic.co.nz/adonis/ or for a decription of a few alternatives: http://www.kylecordes.com/bag/index.html > -Original Message- > From:

Re:[DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-25 Thread Nic Wise
On 25/01/2000 20:26:35, Terry Johnson blurted out... >I've heard conflicting things from various people about ADO and Delphi, and >if I could get a definitive answer, it would be just peachy, and may help >save my remaining hair. > >I would like to connect to SQL Server 7. What do I need? Delp

Re: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-25 Thread Tony Blomfield
You need iether ADO OR BDE/SQL Links. Take your pick - they are both available in D5 Enterprise for royalty free use. You dont need both. No doubt your Email will start yet another war aimed at both techniques on the list. Fact is both work well. Just start using them. Both are fat solutions. Wi

RE: [DUG]: ADO access

2000-01-24 Thread Jeremy Coulter
Just one side point hereyou can always use ADo via the ADO COM object, and not use the Borland components, BUT then ofcourse you cant use the databound controls Jeremy Coulter > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Terry Johnson >