+1 to drop, I hate them.
On 1 Apr 2013, at 10:06, Christian Kaltepoth christ...@kaltepoth.de wrote:
+1 for dropping
2013/3/31 Cody Lerum cody.le...@gmail.com
drop em.
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
yes, let's drop them. annotations are
One small problem is the early integration of DS into JBoss Tools -
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-13901
I don't know how many people if any are using that integration yet.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Pete Muir pm...@redhat.com wrote:
+1 to drop, I hate them.
On 1 Apr 2013, at
Think people know ds is not yet a tlp so some instability is fine IMHO
Le 2 avr. 2013 20:00, Cody Lerum cody.le...@gmail.com a écrit :
One small problem is the early integration of DS into JBoss Tools -
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-13901
I don't know how many people if any are using
nope, TLP only means maturity on the social/community side.
For any users it's just a matter of 2 minutes doing a search/replace on the
imports and then rebuild their app.
That's nothing which we cannot do easily.
LieGrue,
strub
- Original Message -
From: Romain Manni-Bucau
Right but not for users ;)
In all case we can get it for 0.4 no? So no real issue
Le 2 avr. 2013 22:56, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de a écrit :
nope, TLP only means maturity on the social/community side.
For any users it's just a matter of 2 minutes doing a search/replace on
the imports
We understand what it means, but many out in the wild don't understand
that, and I think Romain is correct that many view it as oh, this is
stable and production ready now.
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
nope, TLP only means maturity on the
imo the only realistic way to reduce the probability that we need changes
later on (esp. before v1) is to get involved on a regular basis.
e.g. i like what cody lerum does. he migrates a real application (in
parallel) and asks a lot of useful question (in the irc channel).
that's also a kind of
