One small problem is the early integration of DS into JBoss Tools - https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBIDE-13901
I don't know how many people if any are using that integration yet. On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Pete Muir <pm...@redhat.com> wrote: > +1 to drop, I hate them. > > On 1 Apr 2013, at 10:06, Christian Kaltepoth <christ...@kaltepoth.de> > wrote: > > > +1 for dropping > > > > > > 2013/3/31 Cody Lerum <cody.le...@gmail.com> > > > >> drop em. > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > wrote: > >> > >>> yes, let's drop them. annotations are like interfaces nowadays. So this > >> is > >>> just superfluous. > >>> > >>> LieGrue, > >>> strub > >>> > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>> From: Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com> > >>>> To: deltaspike-dev@incubator.apache.org > >>>> Cc: > >>>> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 5:30 PM > >>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] re-visit "annotation" package/s > >>>> > >>>> hi @ all, > >>>> > >>>> we had an agreement to use a (sub-)package named "annotation" for all > >>>> our > >>>> annotations within a package. > >>>> however, it feels a bit clumsy if a package (currently) just contains > >>>> annotations. > >>>> e.g. org.apache.deltaspike.core.api.exclude only contains the package > >>>> "annotation". > >>>> > >>>> currently we have a mixture (some parts are using the "annotation" > >>>> package > >>>> and some don't) > >>>> -> we have to align it the one way or the other. > >>>> i'm currently in favour of dropping the "annotation"-package/s. > >>>> > >>>> regards, > >>>> gerhard > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Christian Kaltepoth > > Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/ > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal > > GitHub: https://github.com/chkal > >
