[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=all ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-1235:
--
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Move isPoolable() and setPoolable() from PreparedStatement to Statement
Stan Bradbury (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Stan Bradbury updated DERBY-913:
Attachment: 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.diff
4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.pdf
Document patch submitted to be committed:
FILE:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=comments#action_12376427 ]
Kristian Waagan commented on DERBY-1235:
Hi Dyre. Thanks for the patch. I had a look at it, and have the following
comments:
1) The JavaDoc states isPoolable should
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=comments#action_12376431 ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-1235:
---
Hi Kristian, thanks for your comments :)
Good catch(es). I (or rather my grep) completely missed the client side.
Move
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=all ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-1235:
--
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Move isPoolable() and setPoolable() from PreparedStatement to Statement
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-941?page=all ]
V.Narayanan updated DERBY-941:
--
Attachment: statementeventlisteners_client.diff
statementeventlisteners_client.stat
statementeventlisteners_client.html
Attaching
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 396941/2006-04-25 19:46:03 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
NA NA NANA SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
Hi all,
I was just about to send out a mail yesterday, proposing a 10.2
release in August, when I noticed that Kathey and Andrew had published
the 10.1.3 release schedule on the wiki. Although there might be
collisions between the two schedules, I will post my proposal, and
then we can discuss
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1251?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-1251:
Attachment: DERBY-1251.diff
DERBY-1251.stat
derbyall_report.txt
Changes to address this bug:
Embedded JDBC
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1251?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-1251:
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
cancelRowUpdates() affects rows updated with updateRow() in scrollable
updatable resultsets
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1234?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-1234:
--
Attachment: derby-1234-part2.diff
derby-1234-part2.stat
The attached patch fixes all the EmbedXXXStatement methods by adding
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1220?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-1220:
--
Component: SQL
(was: Regression Test Failure)
syntax errors with ibm15 on zOS in a number of lang tests
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1220?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-1220:
--
Attachment: floattypess3.sql
floatman102.out
Attaching the script that - most of the time - still duplicates the behaviour
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1220?page=comments#action_12376459 ]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1220:
---
This must be some kind of resource limit issue - with the full script for
floattypes.sql and altertable.sql the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1220?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren reassigned DERBY-1220:
-
Assign To: (was: Myrna van Lunteren)
Unassigning myself as its not a test issue and I have no expertise looking into
this further.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1220?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-1220:
--
Attachment: derby.log
syntax errors with ibm15 on zOS in a number of lang tests
-
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-326?page=all ]
Tomohito Nakayama updated DERBY-326:
Attachment: DERBY-326_7.patch
I upload DERBY-326_7.patch.
---
Description of patch :
* Remove processing to expand data from
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1234?page=comments#action_12376474 ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-1234:
---
I think derby-1234.part2 looks good, and can be committed.
Verify that we raise SQLException when calling methods on closed
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1234?page=comments#action_12376475 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1234:
---
Thanks, Dyre. Committed part2 in revision 397186.
Verify that we raise SQLException when calling methods on closed
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-903?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-903:
-
Attachment: DERBY-903_101_20060426.stat
DERBY-903_101_20060426.diff
patch for 10.1 - DERBY-903_101_20060426.*
I've run the affected
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-903?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-903:
-
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
Remove use of String(byte[]) and String(byte[], int, int) constructors in
testing leading to non-portable behaviour
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-941?page=comments#action_12376479 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-941:
--
Looks good, but I have some questions/comments:
* Should ClientJDBCObjectFactory40.newPreparedStatement() have
returned
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=all ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-1235:
--
Attachment: derby-1235.v2.diff
derby-1235.v2.stat
Attaching a new patch based on Kristian's very valuable review comments. The
new patch
-
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=comments#action_12376481 ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-1235:
---
I forgot to say that my last comment is about the v2 patch (should be obvious),
that I did not run derbyall again, but that
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=all ]
Kristian Waagan updated DERBY-1235:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
My comments have all beed addressed, and I think the patch ('
derby-1235.v2.diff') looks solid and is ready for commit. I
Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods
Key: DERBY-1253
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253
Project: Derby
Type: Improvement
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1253:
-
Attachment: bug1253_verifier.diff
Attaching bug955_verifier.diff, which contains a junit test, UnsupportedVetter.
This test lists out all of the methods
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
August 1: Release Apache Derby 10.2.1.0.
Obviously, the dates need to be aligned with the 10.1.3 schedule.
Is this something the community wants and would support? And are the
proposed dates for feature freeze and release possible to meet for
those of you who
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll reassigned DERBY-1253:
-
Assign To: Dyre Tjeldvoll
Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory
methods
XAConnection uses NetConnection as underlying physical connection for
JDBC4/Java 1.6
Key: DERBY-1254
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1254
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Hi all,
I was just about to send out a mail yesterday, proposing a 10.2
release in August, when I noticed that Kathey and Andrew had published
the 10.1.3 release schedule on the wiki. Although there might be
collisions between the two schedules, I will post my
Implement new JDBC4 methods for creating empty LOBs
---
Key: DERBY-1255
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1255
Project: Derby
Type: New Feature
Components: JDBC
Versions: 10.2.0.0
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1255?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1255:
-
Summary: Implement new JDBC4 methods for creating empty LOBs in the
embedded client (was: Implement new JDBC4 methods for creating empty LOBs)
What features would you like to see released in August that you don't
think could wait for an October release?
Would an August 10.2 release be instead of the 10.1.3 currently under
way? Or are we talking about a 10.1.3 maintenance (voting starts June
9), followed by 10.2 (voting starts August),
Andreas Korneliussen wrote:
...
+1 I would like to support this release, and the proposed schedule seems
to be realisitic in terms of getting the SUR features (+related
bugfixes) into the release.
at the risk out sounding totally out of touch what's SUR?
-jean
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Andreas Korneliussen wrote:
...
+1 I would like to support this release, and the proposed schedule seems
to be realisitic in terms of getting the SUR features (+related
bugfixes) into the release.
at the risk out sounding totally out of touch what's SUR?
Seems close to the Sept/Oct timeframe proposed for the 10.2 release with
JDBC 4.0.
How confident are we of that proposal?
What I heard, a month ago, seemed like it could be paraphrased as: JDK 1.6
and JDBC 4.0 have slipped, and we aren't sure really when they will be
done, but it won't be
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
...
If Rick is still planning another feature release - which would now be
10.3 I suppose - in Sept./Oct., then it's a -1 from me. Personally,
I'm not much interested just in the churn and the time involved in
testing two such feature releases so close together right
Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
August 1: Release Apache Derby 10.2.1.0.
Obviously, the dates need to be aligned with the 10.1.3 schedule.
Is this something the community wants and would support? And are the
proposed dates for feature freeze
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Stan Bradbury (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Stan Bradbury updated DERBY-913:
Attachment: 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.diff
4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.pdf
Document patch submitted to be
Stanley Bradbury wrote:
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
... deleted info about patch failure
Hi Jean -
I think the 'svn up' might be the problem - I performed an 'svn co' to
refresh my local copy prior to making the changes and creating the DIFF
- would this sync up my copy? I will read up on these
On 4/26/06, Bryan Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the JDK 1.6 and JDBC 4.0 schedules should slip further, for example
into 2007, it would be a shame to have our hands tied and be unable to
ship any sort of a 10.2 release until then.
+1. It's the closeness of what I think the two
Hi Andrew,
Yes, I'm still planning to manage a JDBC4-capable Derby release to go GA
soon after Mustang (jdk1.6) goes GA in September/October. Bryan and Knut
have expressed some concern that the Mustang schedule may slip. Although
I do not foresee a Mustang schedule slip, I acknowledge the
On 4/26/06, Daniel John Debrunner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
You make valid points, and I wholeheartedly agree that we should do a
better job with documenting our snapshots. But, as I'm sure you know,
alpha quality snapshots cannot be used in production.
Yes, but
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-464?page=comments#action_12376518 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-464:
-
Some comments on grantRevokeSpec_v2.html
- The primary keys for SYSTABLEPERMS, SYSCOLPERMS and SYSROUTINEPERMS do
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
August 1: Release Apache Derby 10.2.1.0.
Obviously, the dates need to be aligned with the 10.1.3 schedule.
Is this something the community wants and would support? And are the
proposed dates for feature freeze and
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WWDditaSrc0220.zip)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: wwdDitaSrc0306_Ch1and2.zip)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: workingwithderby0306.pdf)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: workingwithderby0222.pdf)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WorkingWithDerbyV10.html)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WorkingWithDerbyV1.1.html)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WWDpdfNjava0323.zip)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WWDhtml0220.zip)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WWDditaSrc0323.zip)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WWDditaSrc0222.zip)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.diff)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.pdf)
[WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
tutorial document, to the Derby
Remove usage of non-portable methods in derby code
--
Key: DERBY-1256
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1256
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
Components: Store, Test
Reporter: Sunitha Kambhampati
On 4/26/06, Jean T. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes; I suggest deleting 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.diff and 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.pdf
to reduce the clutter in the attachments for DERBY-913.
I happened to remove the ability to delete attachments and comments by
non-administrators as a by-product of
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1078?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas resolved DERBY-1078:
--
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
(was: 10.3.0.0)
Resolution: Fixed
Be able to build Derby when JAVA_HOME is set 1.6
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1078?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas closed DERBY-1078:
Be able to build Derby when JAVA_HOME is set 1.6
Key: DERBY-1078
URL:
Does anyone have a theory about these failures? I have successfully run
some of the failed tests on linux and on xp/cygwin, using build 81 of
jdk1.6: derbynet/DerbyNetAutoStart, nist/schema1, and the encryptionAll
suite.
Regards,
-Rick
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1174?page=all ]
Anders Morken reopened DERBY-1174:
--
Maybe this could be fixed in 10.1.3 as well.
NullPointerException in network server with LDAP authentication
Enhance Derby optimizer and execution model to support effective use of
multiple indexes on one table. Derby currently can use one index on a table and
there are many situations where using multiple indexes on a table could improve
performance significant
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1174?page=all ]
Anders Morken updated DERBY-1174:
-
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
10.1.3.0
NullPointerException in network server with LDAP authentication
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1078?page=comments#action_12376534 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1078:
Committed revision 397278. Fixes XA, encryption and a couple of other tests on
1.3.1. I'm still seeing some diffs in store
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376549 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Is this mandatory/optional method scheme discussed in the JDBC 4.0 spec? In my
latest copy of the spec and java
This is required.
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376549 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Is this mandatory/optional method scheme discussed in
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376549 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Is this mandatory/optional method scheme discussed in the JDBC 4.0
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-900?page=comments#action_12376551 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-900:
--
I am trying to understand the type of case that would cover the code changed
and trigger the encoding problem.Do you have any
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1164?page=all ]
HÃ¥vard Mork updated DERBY-1164:
---
Attachment: 1164_4.diff
Your suggestions are very helpful. I am attaching a new patch (1164_4.diff)
with some changes:
* Modified JDBCDisplayUtil to display a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1247?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-1247:
--
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Committed revision 397300
test DerbyNetAutoStart uses non-portable mechanism to check on derby.log
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-900?page=comments#action_12376567 ]
Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-900:
---
I dont have a testcase available to repro for the p2 patch changes. Let me
look more to see if I can get one. Thanks.
If there is a good chance of Mustang and JDBC4 being ready by Sept/Oct, we should avoid another release in August. Rick doesn't seem to foresee a Mustang schedule slip and given incomplete nature of Grant Revoke authorization, I vote to keep one release in Sep/Oct.
SatheeshOn 4/26/06, Rick
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-438?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-438:
Summary: Update triggers on tables with BLOB and CLOB columns fail at
execution time if the triggered-SQL-statement references the LOB
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-770?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-770:
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
DERBY-438 is being fixed in 10.2 so no need to document restrictions.
Document restrictions mentioned in
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-770?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner closed DERBY-770:
---
Document restrictions mentioned in DERBY-438
Key: DERBY-770
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-771?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-771:
-
Resolution: Fixed
DERBY-438 is being fixed in 10.2 so no need to provide better error messages.
Return better error messages for the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-771?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-771:
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
Return better error messages for the scenarios in DERBY-438
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-771?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner reopened DERBY-771:
-
Return better error messages for the scenarios in DERBY-438
---
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-771?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner closed DERBY-771:
---
Return better error messages for the scenarios in DERBY-438
---
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Stan Bradbury updated DERBY-913:
Attachment: COMMITwwdCh1-4.diff
CheckCommitWWD-Ch1-4.pdf
Attempt two (tested and working): Patch to add
CH 3 and 4, update Ch 1 and 2 and
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376584 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Lance has clarified that this is documented in the Compliance chapter and in
the javadoc.
Verify that we don't raise
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=comments#action_12376592 ]
Stan Bradbury commented on DERBY-913:
-
The build.xml submitted for COMMIT in file: COMMITwwdCh1-4.diff
will correct this problem. DITA will post this misleading message
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=comments#action_12376606 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-913:
Committed COMMITwwdCh1-4.diff, revision 397327.
I made one more change to the build.xml for Linux, modifying the value
Wrong value returned in a row trigger action statement if the table has column
names that are identical when upper-cased.
-
Key: DERBY-1258
URL:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1244?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren resolved DERBY-1244:
---
Resolution: Fixed
ij no longer returns error messages based on derby.ui.locale
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1244?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren closed DERBY-1244:
-
ij no longer returns error messages based on derby.ui.locale
Key:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1247?page=comments#action_12376628 ]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1247:
---
This can be cleanly merged into 10.1:
merge command:
svn merge -r 397299:397300
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1247?page=comments#action_12376631 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1247:
Merged to 10.1 with revision 397381.
test DerbyNetAutoStart uses non-portable mechanism to check on derby.log
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1244?page=comments#action_12376632 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1244:
Should we remove the regression flag, now that this is fixed?
ij no longer returns error messages based on derby.ui.locale
Hi derby-dev,
I posted this as a question to DERBY-1244, but in case people weren't
watching that specific issue, I thought I'd post it as a general
question. That issue covered a regression, but I fixed the issue. It's
now closed, but should we clear the regression flag since there is no
longer
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1174?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1174:
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Merged 395525 to 10.1 with revision 397402.
NullPointerException in network server
Investigate impact of infinite cost estimates on arithmetic
operations/comparisons in the optimizer.
Key: DERBY-1260
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1260
95 matches
Mail list logo