[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-805?page=all ]
Manjula Kutty updated DERBY-805:
Attachment: test_805.htm
> Push join predicates into union and other set operations. DERBY-649
> implemented scalar (single table) predicate pushdown. Adding jo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1007?page=all ]
A B updated DERBY-1007:
---
Attachment: d1007_followup_v1.patch
In a word, the fix for this issue ensures that, in the case of subqueries, the
optimizer will correctly propagate the estimated costs for sub
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-805?page=comments#action_12376646 ]
Manjula Kutty commented on DERBY-805:
-
Testing effect of DERBY-805 changes
various complex queries were created and run against 10.1 and 10.2 versions
and
the results a
Investigate impact of infinite cost estimates on arithmetic
operations/comparisons in the optimizer.
Key: DERBY-1260
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1260
Pro
Optimizer plan consideration doesn't account for infinite cost estimates and
can therefore choose plans requiring excessive memory.
---
Key: DERBY-1259
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1174?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1174:
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Merged 395525 to 10.1 with revision 397402.
> NullPointerException in network server
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-903?page=comments#action_12376636 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-903:
---
Committed 10.1 patch with revision 397394.
> Remove use of String(byte[]) and String(byte[], int, int) constructors in
> testing
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1078?page=comments#action_12376635 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1078:
I could not reproduce the diffs that I had seen in the store unit tests in a
different environment, so I guess this must have
Hi derby-dev,
I posted this as a question to DERBY-1244, but in case people weren't
watching that specific issue, I thought I'd post it as a general
question. That issue covered a regression, but I fixed the issue. It's
now closed, but should we clear the regression flag since there is no
longer a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1244?page=comments#action_12376632 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1244:
Should we remove the regression flag, now that this is fixed?
> ij no longer returns error messages based on derby.ui.locale
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1247?page=comments#action_12376631 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1247:
Merged to 10.1 with revision 397381.
> test DerbyNetAutoStart uses non-portable mechanism to check on derby.log
>
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1247?page=comments#action_12376628 ]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1247:
---
This can be cleanly merged into 10.1:
merge command:
>svn merge -r 397299:397300 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/db/der
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1244?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren closed DERBY-1244:
-
> ij no longer returns error messages based on derby.ui.locale
>
>
> Key: DERBY
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1244?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren resolved DERBY-1244:
---
Resolution: Fixed
> ij no longer returns error messages based on derby.ui.locale
> --
Wrong value returned in a row trigger action statement if the table has column
names that are identical when upper-cased.
-
Key: DERBY-1258
URL: http://issues.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=comments#action_12376606 ]
Jean T. Anderson commented on DERBY-913:
Committed COMMITwwdCh1-4.diff, revision 397327.
I made one more change to the build.xml for Linux, modifying the value
paramete
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=comments#action_12376592 ]
Stan Bradbury commented on DERBY-913:
-
The build.xml submitted for COMMIT in file: COMMITwwdCh1-4.diff
will correct this problem. DITA will post this misleading message (
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376584 ]
Rick Hillegas commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Lance has clarified that this is documented in the Compliance chapter and in
the javadoc.
> Verify that we don't raise SQLFeature
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Stan Bradbury updated DERBY-913:
Attachment: COMMITwwdCh1-4.diff
CheckCommitWWD-Ch1-4.pdf
Attempt two (tested and working): Patch to add
CH 3 and 4, update Ch 1 and 2 and update
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-771?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner closed DERBY-771:
---
> Return better error messages for the scenarios in DERBY-438
> ---
>
> Key: DERB
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-771?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner reopened DERBY-771:
-
> Return better error messages for the scenarios in DERBY-438
> ---
>
> Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-771?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-771:
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
> Return better error messages for the scenarios in DERBY-438
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-771?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-771:
-
Resolution: Fixed
DERBY-438 is being fixed in 10.2 so no need to provide better error messages.
> Return better error messages for the sc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-770?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner closed DERBY-770:
---
> Document restrictions mentioned in DERBY-438
>
>
> Key: DERBY-770
> URL: http://i
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-770?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner resolved DERBY-770:
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
DERBY-438 is being fixed in 10.2 so no need to document restrictions.
> Document restrictions mentioned in DERBY-43
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-438?page=all ]
Daniel John Debrunner updated DERBY-438:
Summary: Update triggers on tables with BLOB and CLOB columns fail at
execution time if the triggered-SQL-statement references the LOB column(s).
If there is a good chance of Mustang and JDBC4 being ready by Sept/Oct, we should avoid another release in August. Rick doesn't seem to foresee a Mustang schedule slip and given incomplete nature of Grant & Revoke authorization, I vote to keep one release in Sep/Oct.
SatheeshOn 4/26/06, Rick Hilleg
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-900?page=comments#action_12376567 ]
Sunitha Kambhampati commented on DERBY-900:
---
I dont have a testcase available to repro for the p2 patch changes. Let me
look more to see if I can get one. Thanks.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1247?page=all ]
Kathey Marsden updated DERBY-1247:
--
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Committed revision 397300
> test DerbyNetAutoStart uses non-portable mechanism to check on derby.log
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1164?page=all ]
HÃ¥vard Mork updated DERBY-1164:
---
Attachment: 1164_4.diff
Your suggestions are very helpful. I am attaching a new patch (1164_4.diff)
with some changes:
* Modified JDBCDisplayUtil to display a se
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-900?page=comments#action_12376551 ]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-900:
--
I am trying to understand the type of case that would cover the code changed
and trigger the encoding problem.Do you have any i
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376549 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Is this mandatory/optional method scheme discussed in the JDBC 4.0 spec
This is required.
Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376549 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Is this mandatory/optional method scheme discussed in
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=comments#action_12376549 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-1253:
--
Is this mandatory/optional method scheme discussed in the JDBC 4.0 spec? In my
latest copy of the spec and java do
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1078?page=comments#action_12376534 ]
Andrew McIntyre commented on DERBY-1078:
Committed revision 397278. Fixes XA, encryption and a couple of other tests on
1.3.1. I'm still seeing some diffs in store tes
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1174?page=all ]
Anders Morken updated DERBY-1174:
-
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
10.1.3.0
> NullPointerException in network server with LDAP authentication
> --
Enhance Derby optimizer and execution model to support effective use of
multiple indexes on one table. Derby currently can use one index on a table and
there are many situations where using multiple indexes on a table could improve
performance significant
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1174?page=all ]
Anders Morken reopened DERBY-1174:
--
Maybe this could be fixed in 10.1.3 as well.
> NullPointerException in network server with LDAP authentication
> -
Does anyone have a theory about these failures? I have successfully run
some of the failed tests on linux and on xp/cygwin, using build 81 of
jdk1.6: derbynet/DerbyNetAutoStart, nist/schema1, and the encryptionAll
suite.
Regards,
-Rick
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1078?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas closed DERBY-1078:
> Be able to build Derby when JAVA_HOME is set 1.6
>
>
> Key: DERBY-1078
> URL: http://issue
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1078?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas resolved DERBY-1078:
--
Fix Version: 10.2.0.0
(was: 10.3.0.0)
Resolution: Fixed
> Be able to build Derby when JAVA_HOME is set 1.6
>
On 4/26/06, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> yes; I suggest deleting 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.diff and 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.pdf
> to reduce the clutter in the attachments for DERBY-913.
I happened to remove the ability to delete attachments and comments by
non-administrators as a by-product o
Remove usage of non-portable methods in derby code
--
Key: DERBY-1256
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1256
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
Components: Store, Test
Reporter: Sunitha Kambhampati
Fix
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.pdf)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby docu
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.diff)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby doc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WWDditaSrc0222.zip)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby documen
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WWDditaSrc0323.zip)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby documen
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WWDhtml0220.zip)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby documentat
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WWDpdfNjava0323.zip)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby docume
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WorkingWithDerbyV1.1.html)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WorkingWithDerbyV10.html)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby d
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: workingwithderby0222.pdf)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby d
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: workingwithderby0306.pdf)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby d
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: wwdDitaSrc0306_Ch1and2.zip)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre updated DERBY-913:
--
Attachment: (was: WWDditaSrc0220.zip)
> [WWD] Proposal to create and add Working With Derby, an activity-based
> tutorial document, to the Derby documen
Daniel John Debrunner wrote:
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
August 1: Release Apache Derby 10.2.1.0.
Obviously, the dates need to be aligned with the 10.1.3 schedule.
Is this something the community wants and would support? And are the
proposed dates for feature freeze and releas
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-464?page=comments#action_12376518 ]
Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-464:
-
Some comments on grantRevokeSpec_v2.html
- The primary keys for SYSTABLEPERMS, SYSCOLPERMS and SYSROUTINEPERMS do not
On 4/26/06, Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
>
> > You make valid points, and I wholeheartedly agree that we should do a
> > better job with documenting our snapshots. But, as I'm sure you know,
> > alpha quality snapshots cannot be used in production.
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
> Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>We could probably do a better job of providing snapshots. Up to this
>>point we have provided them infrequently. Also, looking at the current
>>10.2 snapshot there is no text around it to say why people should pick
>>
Hi Andrew,
Yes, I'm still planning to manage a JDBC4-capable Derby release to go GA
soon after Mustang (jdk1.6) goes GA in September/October. Bryan and Knut
have expressed some concern that the Mustang schedule may slip. Although
I do not foresee a Mustang schedule slip, I acknowledge the risk
On 4/26/06, Bryan Pendleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the JDK 1.6 and JDBC 4.0 schedules should slip further, for example
> into 2007, it would be a shame to have our hands tied and be unable to
> ship any sort of a 10.2 release until then.
+1. It's the closeness of what I think the two pr
Stanley Bradbury wrote:
> Jean T. Anderson wrote:
...
> Hi Jean -
> I think the 'svn up' might be the problem - I performed an 'svn co' to
> refresh my local copy prior to making the changes and creating the DIFF
> - would this sync up my copy? I will read up on these commands and may
> follow-u
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Stan Bradbury (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-913?page=all ]
Stan Bradbury updated DERBY-913:
Attachment: 4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.diff
4COMMIT_wwd_Ch1-4.pdf
Document patch submitted to be c
Daniel John Debrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
>
>> August 1: Release Apache Derby 10.2.1.0.
>>
>> Obviously, the dates need to be aligned with the 10.1.3 schedule.
>>
>> Is this something the community wants and would support? And are the
>> proposed dates for f
Andrew McIntyre wrote:
...
> If Rick is still planning another feature release - which would now be
> 10.3 I suppose - in Sept./Oct., then it's a -1 from me. Personally,
> I'm not much interested just in the churn and the time involved in
> testing two such feature releases so close together right
On 4/26/06, Knut Anders Hatlen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A bug-fix release on the 10.1 branch is very good for Derby in my
> opinion, but I would also really like to see that we got all the new
> features out to our users.
>
> I would therefore like to have a 10.2
> release not depending on the
Seems close to the Sept/Oct timeframe proposed for the 10.2 release with
JDBC 4.0.
How confident are we of that proposal?
What I heard, a month ago, seemed like it could be paraphrased as: "JDK 1.6
and JDBC 4.0 have slipped, and we aren't sure really when they will be
done, but it won't be befo
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Andreas Korneliussen wrote:
...
+1 I would like to support this release, and the proposed schedule seems
to be realisitic in terms of getting the SUR features (+related
bugfixes) into the release.
at the risk out sounding totally out of touch what's SUR?
Scroll
Andreas Korneliussen wrote:
...
>
> +1 I would like to support this release, and the proposed schedule seems
> to be realisitic in terms of getting the SUR features (+related
> bugfixes) into the release.
at the risk out sounding totally out of touch what's SUR?
-jean
What features would you like to see released in August that you don't
think could wait for an October release?
Would an August 10.2 release be instead of the 10.1.3 currently under
way? Or are we talking about a 10.1.3 maintenance (voting starts June
9), followed by 10.2 (voting starts August), fo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1255?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1255:
-
Summary: Implement new JDBC4 methods for creating empty LOBs in the
embedded client (was: Implement new JDBC4 methods for creating empty LOBs)
Descri
Implement new JDBC4 methods for creating empty LOBs
---
Key: DERBY-1255
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1255
Project: Derby
Type: New Feature
Components: JDBC
Versions: 10.2.0.0
Reporter
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Hi all,
I was just about to send out a mail yesterday, proposing a 10.2
release in August, when I noticed that Kathey and Andrew had published
the 10.1.3 release schedule on the wiki. Although there might be
collisions between the two schedules, I will post my proposal,
XAConnection uses NetConnection as underlying physical connection for
JDBC4/Java 1.6
Key: DERBY-1254
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1254
Project: Derby
Type: Bug
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll reassigned DERBY-1253:
-
Assign To: Dyre Tjeldvoll
> Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory
> methods
>
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
> August 1: Release Apache Derby 10.2.1.0.
>
> Obviously, the dates need to be aligned with the 10.1.3 schedule.
>
> Is this something the community wants and would support? And are the
> proposed dates for feature freeze and release possible to meet for
> those of yo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1253:
-
Attachment: bug1253_verifier.diff
Attaching bug955_verifier.diff, which contains a junit test, UnsupportedVetter.
This test lists out all of the methods whic
Verify that we don't raise SQLFeatureNotSupportedException for mandatory methods
Key: DERBY-1253
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1253
Project: Derby
Type: Improvement
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=all ]
Kristian Waagan updated DERBY-1235:
---
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
My comments have all beed addressed, and I think the patch ('
derby-1235.v2.diff') looks solid and is ready for commit. I a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=comments#action_12376481 ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-1235:
---
I forgot to say that my last comment is about the v2 patch (should be obvious),
that I did not run derbyall again, but that jdbc
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=all ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-1235:
--
Attachment: derby-1235.v2.diff
derby-1235.v2.stat
Attaching a new patch based on Kristian's very valuable review comments. The
new patch
-
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-941?page=comments#action_12376479 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-941:
--
Looks good, but I have some questions/comments:
* Should ClientJDBCObjectFactory40.newPreparedStatement() have
returned a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-903?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-903:
-
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
> Remove use of String(byte[]) and String(byte[], int, int) constructors in
> testing leading to non-portable behaviour
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-903?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-903:
-
Attachment: DERBY-903_101_20060426.stat
DERBY-903_101_20060426.diff
patch for 10.1 - DERBY-903_101_20060426.*
I've run the affected t
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1234?page=comments#action_12376475 ]
Knut Anders Hatlen commented on DERBY-1234:
---
Thanks, Dyre. Committed part2 in revision 397186.
> Verify that we raise SQLException when calling methods on closed jav
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1234?page=comments#action_12376474 ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-1234:
---
I think derby-1234.part2 looks good, and can be committed.
> Verify that we raise SQLException when calling methods on closed ja
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-326?page=all ]
Tomohito Nakayama updated DERBY-326:
Attachment: DERBY-326_7.patch
I upload DERBY-326_7.patch.
---
Description of patch :
* Remove processing to expand data from InputStrea
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1220?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-1220:
--
Attachment: derby.log
> syntax errors with ibm15 on zOS in a number of lang tests
> -
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1220?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren reassigned DERBY-1220:
-
Assign To: (was: Myrna van Lunteren)
Unassigning myself as its not a test issue and I have no expertise looking into
this further.
> syn
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1220?page=comments#action_12376459 ]
Myrna van Lunteren commented on DERBY-1220:
---
This must be some kind of resource limit issue - with the full script for
floattypes.sql and altertable.sql the problems
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1220?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-1220:
--
Attachment: floattypess3.sql
floatman102.out
Attaching the script that - most of the time - still duplicates the behaviour
(floatty
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1220?page=all ]
Myrna van Lunteren updated DERBY-1220:
--
Component: SQL
(was: Regression Test Failure)
> syntax errors with ibm15 on zOS in a number of lang tests
> -
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1234?page=all ]
Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-1234:
--
Attachment: derby-1234-part2.diff
derby-1234-part2.stat
The attached patch fixes all the EmbedXXXStatement methods by adding
checkS
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1251?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-1251:
Derby Info: [Patch Available]
> cancelRowUpdates() affects rows updated with updateRow() in scrollable
> updatable resultsets
> ---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1251?page=all ]
Andreas Korneliussen updated DERBY-1251:
Attachment: DERBY-1251.diff
DERBY-1251.stat
derbyall_report.txt
Changes to address this bug:
Embedded JDBC driv
Hi all,
I was just about to send out a mail yesterday, proposing a 10.2
release in August, when I noticed that Kathey and Andrew had published
the 10.1.3 release schedule on the wiki. Although there might be
collisions between the two schedules, I will post my proposal, and
then we can discuss whe
[Auto-generated mail]
*Derby* 396941/2006-04-25 19:46:03 CEST
*derbyall*
Failed TestsOK Skip Duration Platform
---
*Jvm: 1.6*
NA NA NANA SunOS-5.10_i86pc-i386
Details in
http://www.multinet.no/~s
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-941?page=all ]
V.Narayanan updated DERBY-941:
--
Attachment: statementeventlisteners_client.diff
statementeventlisteners_client.stat
statementeventlisteners_client.html
Attaching the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=all ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll updated DERBY-1235:
--
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
> Move isPoolable() and setPoolable() from PreparedStatement to Statement
> -
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1235?page=comments#action_12376431 ]
Dyre Tjeldvoll commented on DERBY-1235:
---
Hi Kristian, thanks for your comments :)
Good catch(es). I (or rather my grep) completely missed the client side.
> Move isPoo
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo