On 02/20/2016 09:18 PM, toki wrote:
On 20/02/2016 20:29, Tim wrote:
You don't use a font organizer?
OTOH, none of the font organizers for Linux I've come across, will walk
specific directories in which one stores uninstalled fonts.
NO, I do not have a package to control which fonts are in
On 20/02/2016 15:44, Tim wrote:
> Here is the text from the Unifont web site [reformated for this email].
I only had unifont 7.x.ttf installed, where "x" is the digits I don't
remember. (I've since deleted it, and installed all four.)
I've since installed the 8.x fonts. I'll play with them
On 20/02/2016 20:29, Tim wrote:
> Here is the text from the Unifont web site [reformated for this email]
.
I only had unifont 7.x.ttf installed, where "x" is the digits I don't
remember. (I've since deleted it, and installed all four.)
I've installed the 8.x fonts today. I'll play with them
On 02/20/2016 02:11 PM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
On 2016-02-20 14:03, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 02/19/2016 01:21 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Francisco,
Francisco Adrián Sánchez píše v Ne 14. 02. 2016 v 14:19 -0300:
Please, reconsider the use of Carlito as a *default* font. It
On 2016-02-20 14:03, Tim---Kracked_P_P---webmaster wrote:
On 02/19/2016 01:21 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Francisco,
Francisco Adrián Sánchez píše v Ne 14. 02. 2016 v 14:19 -0300:
Please, reconsider the use of Carlito as a *default* font. It has
serious
design issues which came with the
On 02/20/2016 03:47 AM, toki wrote:
On February 19, 2016 5:03:59 PM PST, Tim wrote:
Personally, I think you cannot have any font that has "everything" for
"everyone's" needs.
Three or four core fonts, and an extension similar to the one that optimizes
LibO for Japanese, for then 40 or so
On February 19, 2016 5:03:59 PM PST, Tim wrote:
>Personally, I think you cannot have any font that has "everything" for
>"everyone's" needs.
Three or four core fonts, and an extension similar to the one that optimizes
LibO for Japanese, for then 40 or so writing systems that LibO supports.
On 02/19/2016 01:21 PM, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
Hi Francisco,
Francisco Adrián Sánchez píše v Ne 14. 02. 2016 v 14:19 -0300:
Please, reconsider the use of Carlito as a *default* font. It has serious
design issues which came with the "modification" of the original font,
Lato, from which Carlito
Hi Francisco,
Francisco Adrián Sánchez píše v Ne 14. 02. 2016 v 14:19 -0300:
> Please, reconsider the use of Carlito as a *default* font. It has serious
> design issues which came with the "modification" of the original font,
> Lato, from which Carlito takes its symbols.
>
> For example,
Michael Stahl wrote:
> is there a version of these fonts that does not use Graphite features?
Yes, there's an opentype version. You can differentiate them because of the
last character at the name of the type: "Linux Libertine G" and "Linux
Libertine O" are graphite and opentype fonts,
Please, reconsider the use of Carlito as a *default* font. It has serious
design issues which came with the "modification" of the original font,
Lato, from which Carlito takes its symbols.
For example, Carlitos "eight" character is taller than the rest, making
documents look weird:
On 02/13/2016 11:18 PM, Heiko Tietze wrote:
If we change the default font then in all apps, yes. And Source Pro is really
nice, without prefering it over the other cadidates.
I hadnt included the Source Pro font family as one of the suggestions
because we only bundle the sans version, but not
Le samedi 13 février 2016 à 17:50 -0300, Bastián Díaz a écrit :
> El 13-02-2016 16:18, Heiko Tietze escribió:
>
> > On Saturday, 13 February 2016 16:12:44 CET Yousuf 'Jay' Philips wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All, During this week's design meeting, the discussion about
> > > changing the default font in
Hi All,
During this week's design meeting, the discussion about changing the
default font in Impress to Source Sans Pro (tdf#97577) was discussed
further and i felt that changing the default font in only one app isnt
good when we are trying to bring more and more consistency between apps
and
Hi,
Yousuf 'Jay' Philips wrote on 13-02-16 13:12:
> During this week's design meeting, the discussion about changing the
> default font in Impress to Source Sans Pro (tdf#97577) was discussed
> further and i felt that changing the default font in only one app isnt
> good when we are trying to
On Saturday, 13 February 2016 16:12:44 CET Yousuf 'Jay' Philips wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> During this week's design meeting, the discussion about changing the
> default font in Impress to Source Sans Pro (tdf#97577) was discussed
> further and i felt that changing the default font in only one app isnt
El 13-02-2016 16:18, Heiko Tietze escribió:
On Saturday, 13 February 2016 16:12:44 CET Yousuf 'Jay' Philips wrote:
Hi All, During this week's design meeting, the discussion about
changing the default font in Impress to Source Sans Pro (tdf#97577)
was discussed further and i felt that
17 matches
Mail list logo
