On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:31 PM, mray wrote:
On 24.03.2016 21:29, Michael Siepmann wrote:
I'm also not clear on how the honor pledge fits in to MVP, given
it's
about editing wiki pages and posting discussion comments?
I should mention, we *do* have wiki pages, currently
On 24.03.2016 21:29, Michael Siepmann wrote:
> Generally yes. I think some of the info in some of the excluded pages
> (e.g. the sub-pages of /how-it-works/ and /about/ ) might need to be
> incorporated into the higher-level pages (e.g., /how-it-works ), perhaps
> partly via in-page
On 03/24/2016 03:52 AM, mray wrote:
> During the last meeting with iko and chreekat we compiled the list of
> pages that seem to be needed for MVP:
>
> @Michael:
>
>
> welcome
> /about (the project organization for newcomers: team, contact info, etc)
as long as the about page links to all
Generally yes. I think some of the info in some of the excluded pages
(e.g. the sub-pages of /how-it-works/ and /about/ ) might need to be
incorporated into the higher-level pages (e.g., /how-it-works ), perhaps
partly via in-page tooltip-like things, but in general I'm in favor of
reducing the
On 24.03.2016 11:52, mray wrote:
> During the last meeting with iko and chreekat we compiled the list of
> pages that seem to be needed for MVP:
>
> @Michael:
>
I forgot to actually ask: does this look like a sensible set of pages in
your eyes, too?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
During the last meeting with iko and chreekat we compiled the list of
pages that seem to be needed for MVP:
@Michael:
welcome
/about (the project organization for newcomers: team, contact info, etc)
/dashboard (overview and status of pledges and balance)
/login
/logout
/create-account