[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified

2009-07-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
Apologies. Forgot about this bug in my inbox, after 3 weeks of traveling. Yes, this is reproducible. The steps I provided in the description still produce the issue, even in Jaunty. What more would you like? Shall I create a script? -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified

2009-07-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hmm, this now seems to work /almost/ flawlessly for USB keys, and I assume as well for filesystems that get mounted ad-hoc. It still doesn't work for the use case of a file system owned by me and mounted automatically by fstab (as suggested in the description). I'll post a semi-script shortly. -

[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified

2009-07-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
Human script: 1. Open a terminal # Part 1: create empty directory in $HOME, and mount different file system to it. # "Different filesystem" will exist entirely in RAM, and will take at most 5M. $ cd ~ $ mkdir tmp_tester $ sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=5M,uid=1000,gid=1000 trash_test tmp_tester #

[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified

2009-07-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
Still exists, although in a semi-reduced form, as explained in the comments below. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image

2009-04-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
Would set priority of this bug to low, but I don't seem to know how, or maybe I don't have the access ... -- show file name while burning image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367325 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero

[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image

2009-04-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
A further thought ... if normally only make the basename were initially visible, but on some sort of interaction (mouseover? button?) display the complete path name, I'd say that could be helpful as well. I *usually* don't need the complete path name, but it would have been useful a couple of time

[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image

2009-04-27 Thread Kevin Hunter
No, Intrepid. Given the reports of lack-of-stability, I'll be waiting to upgrade for at least a month, if not just skip the cycle. These seem to be the pertinent details devs want: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: . . Ubuntu Description: . . . Ubuntu 8.10 Release:

[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image

2009-05-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
Having been through this before, I'll get a very similar response. There is a very wide gap between the end-user-seeing-a-bug-in-"in- use"-software and the developer-developing-on-the-cutting-edge. As a semi-educated end-user, I don't know how to cross that bridge effectively enough for developers

[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention

2009-04-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
1. Yes, every time. 2. Just tried on Jaunty. The issue is still there, although it takes a *much* longer time to reach it: It takes 300 seconds to timeout. Now, it correctly removes the interaction dialog (user credentials), but still has the explanation dialog. I think the reaction from Ubunt

[Bug 335255] [NEW] incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention

2009-02-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs Mounting a file system times out, with (forgetful) user-intervention is required. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a partition on your local hard drive, something that nautilus will place under "Places" in the left pane. 2. Click on it, so that Nauti

[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention

2009-02-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
This is obviously a low-priority bug. -- incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@

[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention

2009-02-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
This is likely related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/288543. However, I claim it is unique because the behavior in this case should instead either have no timeout, or should timeout and remove the user interface part. -- incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention https://bugs.

[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention

2009-02-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
$ uname -a Linux hani 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 19:28:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 Codename: intrepid ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gvfs - M

[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified

2009-06-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
** Package changed: ubuntu => nautilus (Ubuntu) -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists

[Bug 370615] Re: video thumbnailer uses too many resources.

2009-06-22 Thread Kevin Hunter
No news. I did send the bug upstream. It's such a small issue, and one that is likely only noticed by geeks, power nuts, or folks who haven't yet put 2 and 2 together (and they will because they're savvy enough to use Bittorrent or otherwise mess with large files) that I didn't worry about it. B

[Bug 370615] Re: video thumbnailer uses too many resources.

2009-06-22 Thread Kevin Hunter
Blast. That would be did *not* send the bug upstream. ** Package changed: totem (Ubuntu) => nautilus (Ubuntu) -- video thumbnailer uses too many resources. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug

[Bug 259186] Re: gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk

2009-01-05 Thread Kevin Hunter
No need to reopen this bug if it's fixed, but a data point: I wonder if the internal issue was that the vfs/gnome-screenshot was checking for enough free space prior to saving? If so, I believe the RAMFS doesn't report that. So, my workaround was to change that dir to tmpfs: $ sudo mount -t tmp

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-06-30 Thread Kevin Hunter
Rhythmbox v0.11.5 $ dpkg -l "*rhythmbox*" [snip] ii rhythmbox 0.11.5-0ubuntu music player and organizer for GNOME -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 244324] [NEW] no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-06-30 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: Short version: If there is no sound server started, and I attempt to play a song, Rhythmbox freezes. Starting the sound server manually afterward does not help, and I have to force-quit Rhythmbox and reopen. System info: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distr

[Bug 281440] [NEW] archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller In using file-roller, I note that I'm unable to order the contents hierarchically and whatever-else-ically. That is, if I order by date, and then by hierarchy, I should see the root of a folder, then it's contents. If you wanted to be clever

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
** Attachment added: "Shows weird ordering of file-roller" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18419288/file-roller-ordering-screenshot.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18419289/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibra

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Sorry, I didn't reread after writing my train-of-thought. The first paragraph should have said: "... else-ically. That is, if I order location (hierarchy), I should see a folder, then it's contents. If ..." -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 Y

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Sorry for previous comment noise: totally forgot that I could just update the description. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: file-roller In using file-roller, I note that I'm unable to order the contents - hierarchically and whatever-else-ically. That is, if I order by date, -

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-11 Thread Kevin Hunter
* Is this reproducible? It seems to be. I haven't put 100% effort into drilling out how because I'm used to just using the underlying command line utility (tar, zip, etc.). In the mean time, I got lazy and went with the double-click on email attachments, hence file-roller. * If so, what specifi

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-11 Thread Kevin Hunter
Okay, researching it more thoroughly now, I think the issue is that even when I sort by location, file-roller wants to keep the directories sorted together. This is incorrect, in my opinion. If I sort by location, the entries should be sorted *by location*. In the BaseDir screenshots I've posted

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-13 Thread Kevin Hunter
Alright, pardon the noise, I'll take it upstream. -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
No, not yet. Given Sebastien's indication that I haven't clearly explained the problem, I need to refine the problem I think I'm seeing. I haven't yet taken the time to do that. Given your attentions to other, more important bugs and the upcoming releases, suggest you close this ticket, and I'll

[Bug 195125] [NEW] accessability enhancement: 5 min fix?

2008-02-24 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcalctool I just accidentally maximized gcalctool. Slightly suprisingly that I could maximize it. Then I noticed the buttons all got bigger to fill the space. Also cool. Surprising again, but actually perhaps handy. What if I'm (partially) blind? The

[Bug 195125] Re: accessability enhancement: 5 min fix?

2008-02-24 Thread Kevin Hunter
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12174143/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12174144/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12174145/ProcStatus.txt -- access

[Bug 33349] Re: Timeout is too short on dimming

2008-05-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
slider_idea++; To put some more meat on this from another user, I often will sit "idle" reading a long web page, figuring out a page of code, or deciding what to write next, and inevitably the screen will get dimmer while I'm in the middle of a thought process. This comes at just the right tim

[Bug 33349] Re: Timeout is too short on dimming

2008-05-14 Thread Kevin Hunter
I suppose this is a request for a feature. I /could/ do the command line, but what I love about Ubuntu is that for the most part, I don't have to. It's not a decent enough work around to satisfy this (admittedly picky) user. How does one go about making this a blueprint request? -- Timeout is

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-11-05 Thread Kevin Hunter
No, not yet. As per usual, things in my life have cropped up. I won't even attempt until after 23 Nov. Suggest to close this bug. I have it marked in my TODO list for after 23 Nov to send upstream, and then send a pointer to y'all. -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-08-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
> what did you select in the system menu, > preferences, sounds, music and video option? They're all set to ALSA. Not PulseAudio. Setting to PulseAudio will likely solve my immediate issue but is *not* the point of the bug report. The point is that Rhythmbox should not crash if no sound server

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-08-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
I can give you Rhythmbox's debug output, as obtained by $ rhythmbox -d > rhythmbox.dbg 2>&1 ... I'm snipped most of the unimportant precursor stuffs up to the point I switched to the window and tried to play a song. ** Attachment added: "rhythmbox debug output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/1

[Bug 259186] [NEW] gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk

2008-08-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: >From the department of random-bugs: I've created a ramdisk in my $HOME directory as such: $ pwd /home/kevin $ sudo mount -t ramfs kevins_ram_disk ram/ $ mount | grep kevins_ram_disk kevins_ram_disk on /home/kevin/ram type ramfs (rw) Now, when I try to save a screenshot t

[Bug 259186] Re: gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk

2008-08-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
Bah, I can't operate cut and paste properly. The similar bug would be https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31994 , not 71492. Sorry for my C&P ineptitude. -- gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259186 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 259186] Re: gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk

2008-08-19 Thread Kevin Hunter
Good call. I didn't do a proper cut and paste (again!), but I also do a $ sudo chown kevin:kevin $HOME/ram so that I can write to it, etc. The touch is a good test. I haven't run it from the CLI, so I can't confirm that it's crashing, just that it "doesn't work." Helpful, I know. :-) -- gn

[Bug 33349] Re: Timeout is too short on dimming

2008-09-09 Thread Kevin Hunter
Any news? Has this turned into a blueprint yet? I'm not finding it if it is. -- Timeout is too short on dimming https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- de

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
Sorry, I should have gotten back to this sooner. My point with this bug report was not that I had my settings set properly for the exact setup (I do, but I have to remember to start pulseaudio, currently), but that Rhythmbox dies. A program should /not/ just die; Rhythmbox should *gracefully* han

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
For the record: aplay *successfully* plays wav files when pulseaudio is running (as expected) aplay does *not* work when pulseaudio is stopped (as expected) (*** PULSEAUDIO: Unable to connect: Connection refused) Again: the issue is whether Rhythmbox gracefully handles an unexpected condition, n

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
** Description changed: + Problem (added after discussion): + + Rhythmbox freezes when no sound-server is available. This is *not* + correct behavior. Though there may be another configuration issue as + well, Rhythmbox freezing is the issue. It should not freeze, and should + gracefully handl

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
@ Mike, I've updated the description. Even included a "healthy competition" charge. :-) Does that work? @Sebastien, hmm, okay. From an "end-user point of view", all I know is that Rhythmbox freezes. Good call in deducing *where* the problem is, as I mentioned this on the Rhythmbox mailing lis

[Bug 109709] Re: feisty - installed applets (invest, weather) on panel; they don't respond, and I can't remove them

2007-09-14 Thread Kevin Hunter
This is directed at Sebastien Bacher, hoping that this adds some more info. I'm not clear on what was needed for the bug report, but I'll try to be responsive if asked a direct question. I can't comment on 7.10 Alpha 5, but with 7.04, the invest applet "doesn't work". I'm not sure to what degree

[Bug 33349] Re: Timeout is too short on dimming

2008-05-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
slider_idea++; To put some more meat on this from another user, I often will sit "idle" reading a long web page, figuring out a page of code, or deciding what to write next, and inevitably the screen will get dimmer while I'm in the middle of a thought process. This comes at just the right tim

[Bug 33349] Re: Timeout is too short on dimming

2008-05-14 Thread Kevin Hunter
I suppose this is a request for a feature. I /could/ do the command line, but what I love about Ubuntu is that for the most part, I don't have to. It's not a decent enough work around to satisfy this (admittedly picky) user. How does one go about making this a blueprint request? -- Timeout is

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
No, not yet. Given Sebastien's indication that I haven't clearly explained the problem, I need to refine the problem I think I'm seeing. I haven't yet taken the time to do that. Given your attentions to other, more important bugs and the upcoming releases, suggest you close this ticket, and I'll

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-11-05 Thread Kevin Hunter
No, not yet. As per usual, things in my life have cropped up. I won't even attempt until after 23 Nov. Suggest to close this bug. I have it marked in my TODO list for after 23 Nov to send upstream, and then send a pointer to y'all. -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.

[Bug 195125] [NEW] accessability enhancement: 5 min fix?

2008-02-24 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcalctool I just accidentally maximized gcalctool. Slightly suprisingly that I could maximize it. Then I noticed the buttons all got bigger to fill the space. Also cool. Surprising again, but actually perhaps handy. What if I'm (partially) blind? The

[Bug 195125] Re: accessability enhancement: 5 min fix?

2008-02-24 Thread Kevin Hunter
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12174143/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12174144/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12174145/ProcStatus.txt -- access

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-06-30 Thread Kevin Hunter
Rhythmbox v0.11.5 $ dpkg -l "*rhythmbox*" [snip] ii rhythmbox 0.11.5-0ubuntu music player and organizer for GNOME -- no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/244324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 244324] [NEW] no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-06-30 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: Short version: If there is no sound server started, and I attempt to play a song, Rhythmbox freezes. Starting the sound server manually afterward does not help, and I have to force-quit Rhythmbox and reopen. System info: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distr

[Bug 33349] Re: Timeout is too short on dimming

2008-09-09 Thread Kevin Hunter
Any news? Has this turned into a blueprint yet? I'm not finding it if it is. -- Timeout is too short on dimming https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33349 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- de

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
Sorry, I should have gotten back to this sooner. My point with this bug report was not that I had my settings set properly for the exact setup (I do, but I have to remember to start pulseaudio, currently), but that Rhythmbox dies. A program should /not/ just die; Rhythmbox should *gracefully* han

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
For the record: aplay *successfully* plays wav files when pulseaudio is running (as expected) aplay does *not* work when pulseaudio is stopped (as expected) (*** PULSEAUDIO: Unable to connect: Connection refused) Again: the issue is whether Rhythmbox gracefully handles an unexpected condition, n

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
** Description changed: + Problem (added after discussion): + + Rhythmbox freezes when no sound-server is available. This is *not* + correct behavior. Though there may be another configuration issue as + well, Rhythmbox freezing is the issue. It should not freeze, and should + gracefully handl

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
@ Mike, I've updated the description. Even included a "healthy competition" charge. :-) Does that work? @Sebastien, hmm, okay. From an "end-user point of view", all I know is that Rhythmbox freezes. Good call in deducing *where* the problem is, as I mentioned this on the Rhythmbox mailing lis

[Bug 281440] [NEW] archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller In using file-roller, I note that I'm unable to order the contents hierarchically and whatever-else-ically. That is, if I order by date, and then by hierarchy, I should see the root of a folder, then it's contents. If you wanted to be clever

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
** Attachment added: "Shows weird ordering of file-roller" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18419288/file-roller-ordering-screenshot.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18419289/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibra

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Sorry, I didn't reread after writing my train-of-thought. The first paragraph should have said: "... else-ically. That is, if I order location (hierarchy), I should see a folder, then it's contents. If ..." -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 Y

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Sorry for previous comment noise: totally forgot that I could just update the description. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: file-roller In using file-roller, I note that I'm unable to order the contents - hierarchically and whatever-else-ically. That is, if I order by date, -

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-11 Thread Kevin Hunter
* Is this reproducible? It seems to be. I haven't put 100% effort into drilling out how because I'm used to just using the underlying command line utility (tar, zip, etc.). In the mean time, I got lazy and went with the double-click on email attachments, hence file-roller. * If so, what specifi

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-11 Thread Kevin Hunter
Okay, researching it more thoroughly now, I think the issue is that even when I sort by location, file-roller wants to keep the directories sorted together. This is incorrect, in my opinion. If I sort by location, the entries should be sorted *by location*. In the BaseDir screenshots I've posted

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-13 Thread Kevin Hunter
Alright, pardon the noise, I'll take it upstream. -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 109709] Re: feisty - installed applets (invest, weather) on panel; they don't respond, and I can't remove them

2007-09-14 Thread Kevin Hunter
This is directed at Sebastien Bacher, hoping that this adds some more info. I'm not clear on what was needed for the bug report, but I'll try to be responsive if asked a direct question. I can't comment on 7.10 Alpha 5, but with 7.04, the invest applet "doesn't work". I'm not sure to what degree

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-08-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
> what did you select in the system menu, > preferences, sounds, music and video option? They're all set to ALSA. Not PulseAudio. Setting to PulseAudio will likely solve my immediate issue but is *not* the point of the bug report. The point is that Rhythmbox should not crash if no sound server

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-08-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
I can give you Rhythmbox's debug output, as obtained by $ rhythmbox -d > rhythmbox.dbg 2>&1 ... I'm snipped most of the unimportant precursor stuffs up to the point I switched to the window and tried to play a song. ** Attachment added: "rhythmbox debug output" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/1

[Bug 259186] [NEW] gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk

2008-08-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: >From the department of random-bugs: I've created a ramdisk in my $HOME directory as such: $ pwd /home/kevin $ sudo mount -t ramfs kevins_ram_disk ram/ $ mount | grep kevins_ram_disk kevins_ram_disk on /home/kevin/ram type ramfs (rw) Now, when I try to save a screenshot t

[Bug 259186] Re: gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk

2008-08-18 Thread Kevin Hunter
Bah, I can't operate cut and paste properly. The similar bug would be https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/31994 , not 71492. Sorry for my C&P ineptitude. -- gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/259186 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 259186] Re: gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk

2008-08-19 Thread Kevin Hunter
Good call. I didn't do a proper cut and paste (again!), but I also do a $ sudo chown kevin:kevin $HOME/ram so that I can write to it, etc. The touch is a good test. I haven't run it from the CLI, so I can't confirm that it's crashing, just that it "doesn't work." Helpful, I know. :-) -- gn

[Bug 259186] Re: gnome-screenshot won't save to a ram disk

2009-01-05 Thread Kevin Hunter
No need to reopen this bug if it's fixed, but a data point: I wonder if the internal issue was that the vfs/gnome-screenshot was checking for enough free space prior to saving? If so, I believe the RAMFS doesn't report that. So, my workaround was to change that dir to tmpfs: $ sudo mount -t tmp

[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified

2009-06-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
** Package changed: ubuntu => nautilus (Ubuntu) -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists

[Bug 370615] Re: video thumbnailer uses too many resources.

2009-06-22 Thread Kevin Hunter
No news. I did send the bug upstream. It's such a small issue, and one that is likely only noticed by geeks, power nuts, or folks who haven't yet put 2 and 2 together (and they will because they're savvy enough to use Bittorrent or otherwise mess with large files) that I didn't worry about it. B

[Bug 370615] Re: video thumbnailer uses too many resources.

2009-06-22 Thread Kevin Hunter
Blast. That would be did *not* send the bug upstream. ** Package changed: totem (Ubuntu) => nautilus (Ubuntu) -- video thumbnailer uses too many resources. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug

[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention

2009-04-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
1. Yes, every time. 2. Just tried on Jaunty. The issue is still there, although it takes a *much* longer time to reach it: It takes 300 seconds to timeout. Now, it correctly removes the interaction dialog (user credentials), but still has the explanation dialog. I think the reaction from Ubunt

[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image

2009-04-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
Would set priority of this bug to low, but I don't seem to know how, or maybe I don't have the access ... -- show file name while burning image https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367325 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero

[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image

2009-04-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
A further thought ... if normally only make the basename were initially visible, but on some sort of interaction (mouseover? button?) display the complete path name, I'd say that could be helpful as well. I *usually* don't need the complete path name, but it would have been useful a couple of time

[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image

2009-04-27 Thread Kevin Hunter
No, Intrepid. Given the reports of lack-of-stability, I'll be waiting to upgrade for at least a month, if not just skip the cycle. These seem to be the pertinent details devs want: $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: . . Ubuntu Description: . . . Ubuntu 8.10 Release:

[Bug 335255] [NEW] incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention

2009-02-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gvfs Mounting a file system times out, with (forgetful) user-intervention is required. Steps to reproduce: 1. Create a partition on your local hard drive, something that nautilus will place under "Places" in the left pane. 2. Click on it, so that Nauti

[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention

2009-02-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
This is obviously a low-priority bug. -- incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335255 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@

[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention

2009-02-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
This is likely related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/288543. However, I claim it is unique because the behavior in this case should instead either have no timeout, or should timeout and remove the user interface part. -- incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention https://bugs.

[Bug 335255] Re: incorrect mount timeout when no user intervention

2009-02-26 Thread Kevin Hunter
$ uname -a Linux hani 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Thu Jan 29 19:28:32 UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 Codename: intrepid ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gvfs - M

[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified

2009-07-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
Apologies. Forgot about this bug in my inbox, after 3 weeks of traveling. Yes, this is reproducible. The steps I provided in the description still produce the issue, even in Jaunty. What more would you like? Shall I create a script? -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified

2009-07-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
Hmm, this now seems to work /almost/ flawlessly for USB keys, and I assume as well for filesystems that get mounted ad-hoc. It still doesn't work for the use case of a file system owned by me and mounted automatically by fstab (as suggested in the description). I'll post a semi-script shortly. -

[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified

2009-07-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
Human script: 1. Open a terminal # Part 1: create empty directory in $HOME, and mount different file system to it. # "Different filesystem" will exist entirely in RAM, and will take at most 5M. $ cd ~ $ mkdir tmp_tester $ sudo mount -t tmpfs -o size=5M,uid=1000,gid=1000 trash_test tmp_tester #

[Bug 351771] Re: trash file systems not unified

2009-07-20 Thread Kevin Hunter
Still exists, although in a semi-reduced form, as explained in the comments below. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- trash file systems not unified https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 367325] Re: show file name while burning image

2009-05-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
Having been through this before, I'll get a very similar response. There is a very wide gap between the end-user-seeing-a-bug-in-"in- use"-software and the developer-developing-on-the-cutting-edge. As a semi-educated end-user, I don't know how to cross that bridge effectively enough for developers

[Bug 33349] Re: Timeout is too short on dimming

2008-05-14 Thread Kevin Hunter
I suppose this is a request for a feature. I /could/ do the command line, but what I love about Ubuntu is that for the most part, I don't have to. It's not a decent enough work around to satisfy this (admittedly picky) user. How does one go about making this a blueprint request? -- Timeout is

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-11-05 Thread Kevin Hunter
No, not yet. As per usual, things in my life have cropped up. I won't even attempt until after 23 Nov. Suggest to close this bug. I have it marked in my TODO list for after 23 Nov to send upstream, and then send a pointer to y'all. -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
Sorry, I should have gotten back to this sooner. My point with this bug report was not that I had my settings set properly for the exact setup (I do, but I have to remember to start pulseaudio, currently), but that Rhythmbox dies. A program should /not/ just die; Rhythmbox should *gracefully* han

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
For the record: aplay *successfully* plays wav files when pulseaudio is running (as expected) aplay does *not* work when pulseaudio is stopped (as expected) (*** PULSEAUDIO: Unable to connect: Connection refused) Again: the issue is whether Rhythmbox gracefully handles an unexpected condition, n

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
** Description changed: + Problem (added after discussion): + + Rhythmbox freezes when no sound-server is available. This is *not* + correct behavior. Though there may be another configuration issue as + well, Rhythmbox freezing is the issue. It should not freeze, and should + gracefully handl

[Bug 244324] Re: no sound-server available, rhythmbox freezes

2008-10-01 Thread Kevin Hunter
@ Mike, I've updated the description. Even included a "healthy competition" charge. :-) Does that work? @Sebastien, hmm, okay. From an "end-user point of view", all I know is that Rhythmbox freezes. Good call in deducing *where* the problem is, as I mentioned this on the Rhythmbox mailing lis

[Bug 281440] [NEW] archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller In using file-roller, I note that I'm unable to order the contents hierarchically and whatever-else-ically. That is, if I order by date, and then by hierarchy, I should see the root of a folder, then it's contents. If you wanted to be clever

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
** Attachment added: "Shows weird ordering of file-roller" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18419288/file-roller-ordering-screenshot.png ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18419289/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibra

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Sorry, I didn't reread after writing my train-of-thought. The first paragraph should have said: "... else-ically. That is, if I order location (hierarchy), I should see a folder, then it's contents. If ..." -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 Y

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-10 Thread Kevin Hunter
Sorry for previous comment noise: totally forgot that I could just update the description. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: file-roller In using file-roller, I note that I'm unable to order the contents - hierarchically and whatever-else-ically. That is, if I order by date, -

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-11 Thread Kevin Hunter
* Is this reproducible? It seems to be. I haven't put 100% effort into drilling out how because I'm used to just using the underlying command line utility (tar, zip, etc.). In the mean time, I got lazy and went with the double-click on email attachments, hence file-roller. * If so, what specifi

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-11 Thread Kevin Hunter
Okay, researching it more thoroughly now, I think the issue is that even when I sort by location, file-roller wants to keep the directories sorted together. This is incorrect, in my opinion. If I sort by location, the entries should be sorted *by location*. In the BaseDir screenshots I've posted

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-13 Thread Kevin Hunter
Alright, pardon the noise, I'll take it upstream. -- archive should order contents hierarchically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.u

[Bug 281440] Re: archive should order contents hierarchically

2008-10-21 Thread Kevin Hunter
No, not yet. Given Sebastien's indication that I haven't clearly explained the problem, I need to refine the problem I think I'm seeing. I haven't yet taken the time to do that. Given your attentions to other, more important bugs and the upcoming releases, suggest you close this ticket, and I'll

  1   2   3   >