You shouldn't be running shares-admin as root, this creates many issues.
Just run 'shares-admin', and authenticate via PolicyKit. (And anyway
your version is really too old, sorry.)
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notific
To be fair, only one address is outdated. The project homepage, mailing
list, FTP server, GNOME module name and IRC channel are all valid. And
it's not like GNOME is a completely unknown project! I'll remove the
whitepaper address, and maybe I'll fix the website to stop telling about
CVS/SVN since
Confirming the suggested solution. As I said on bug 630430, this will simply
require adding a:
auth sufficient pam_succeed_if.so user ingroup nopasswdlogin
line in /etc/pam.d/gnome-screensaver, right before:
@include common-auth
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided =
Let's deal with the gnome-screensaver task on the other bug, then, and
close this one.
The gdm/gnome-system-tools part is fixed with the g-s-t 2.32 in
Maverick.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Invalid
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: T
Thanks for your report. Could you post the errors you get when logging
in?
Please also follow instructions from
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingGnomeSystemTools
and attach information here.
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug not
OK, I'm closing because there's not much we can do without somebody
experiencing the bug. The Gentoo "fix" doesn't sound very logical to me,
but...
** Changed in: system-tools-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
According to people having the same bug in Gentoo, running
sudo chmod o+x /usr/libexec/dbus-daemon-launch-helper
solves this bug. Could you report if it's also a solution for you? Thanks!
** Changed in: system-tools-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug
** Package changed: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) => gnome-settings-daemon
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708143
Title:
wnck-applet shows rotated moni
That's not a regression. In the worst case, nothing changes. But I
suspect for some reason Charlie isn't using the version with the fix,
since he also said bug 533870 wasn't fixed. What's your version number
of system-tools-backends?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
OK, thanks! Could you get more debugging information by following instructions
for users-admin at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingGnomeSystemTools
No issue with the delays, I'm not in a hurry... ;-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which i
So your system isn't broken, it's just that adduser doesn't interact
well with automount. I'm not sure why this doesn't work (i.e. why /home
isn't mounted when adduser tries to access it), nor if it should work.
But that's not a bug in users-admin. You could report a bug against
adduser in Debian (
Thanks! The interesting part is:
file_run_full_failed::Command [/usr/sbin/adduser --gecos --disabled-password
bugta] failed.
Since the user wasn't created, everything else fails.
What do you get when you run:
sudo /usr/sbin/adduser --gecos --disabled-password bugta
in a terminal? You'll get the
The problem isn't that I fear people won't do the work, as I know
packaging will happen anyway. It's just that the way Ubuntu devs
consider patching is plain wrong: there's generally no hurry pushing a
fix to the development release, so downstream patching only generates
useless work. I wish Ubuntu
Thanks for the debugging and for the patch, but I don't think it fixes
the root cause. tzmap->point_hover should already contain the point that
was retrieved using e_map_get_closest_point() when the pointer moved. So
if tzmap->point_hover isn't valid, we have to find out why. The
questions I asked
The version I'm suggesting you to use is actually much more stable than the one
you're currently using... ;-) You can install it without updating any other
packages by getting it from
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/system-tools-backends_2.9.4-0ubuntu1.1_i386.deb
(for 32bits
If this is reported to work, it might be wise to directly upload
nautilus 2.32.2.1 to maverick-updates, because it includes this fix
among others.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Upstream said we should also backport patch from
http://git.gnome.org/browse/nautilus/commit/?h=gnome-2-32&id=c3b54e662b52ca15d1dcbe68386b8fa82b12adc5
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #627901
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/
Thanks for your report. I see you're using the system-tools-backends
2.9.4-0ubuntu1, while the most recent version is 2.9.4-0ubuntu1.1, which
fixes many issues. Could you enable the lucid-proposed repository, run
the updates manager, and retry? See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed
To
Thanks Romano, it allowed us to discover those forgotten reports! I've
made the other bug public.
These traces are very confusing, since they are all very similar to the
original bug 630884. I'm going to report this upstream, and see what
they say...
--
You received this bug notification because
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 683972 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 683972
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke() ejecting drives
* You can subscribe to bug 683972 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.n
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 683972 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 699664
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOXED()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 683972
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 683972 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683972
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 699664
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOXED()
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 683972
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/699664
Title:
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOXED()
--
desktop-bugs m
This bug is weird because we seem to be passing NULL as location point.
This can only happen if no point was highlighted when you clicked; the
pointer must get out of the map for the point to be set to NULL. Do
different effects happen if e.g. you hover a different point before
clicking on Chicago?
And only when clicking on that point? Here I'm not able to reproduce the
crash...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697974
Title:
time-admin crashed with SI
Romano: see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Apport#How%20to%20enable%20apport
about how to get a trace.
The log is interesting, it may indicate that Nautilus tries to get some
information from ConsoleKit, which fails. Then, maybe it follows a code
path that hasn't been really tested because it doesn't nor
Thanks for the report, but I/O errors generally come from failing hard
disk drives, and not from a bug in a package. Thus, I'm closing this
report. I advise you to make a backup of your files in case you disk is
dying... ;-)
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
ubby: so same questions as in my comment #5...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647371
Title:
time-admin crashed with SIGSEGV in e_map_point_get_location()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 685215 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685215
The warning comes from a minor bug where we try to unreference the user
face icon even if there is none. It has no real incidence and is fixed
upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 685215 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685215
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 685215
users-admin hangs immediately when run as root
* You can subscribe to bug 685215 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gno
Le mercredi 05 janvier 2011 à 20:28 +, gpk a écrit :
> No thanks. People love to add features. You can't stop someone who
> has a pet idea that they haven't
> thought through very carefully.They just produce self-justifying
> reasons and don't listen.
That's an idea that came from des
This button is going to be reworked soon anyway. This problem is known
upstream, I think there's a bug open about that.
** Package changed: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) => policykit-1-gnome
(Ubuntu)
** Changed in: policykit-1-gnome (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: policykit
Le mercredi 05 janvier 2011 à 07:49 +, gpk a écrit :
> Essentially, the trade-off is a minor convenience 99.999% of the time,
> versus a modest (or major) disaster 0.001% of the time.
That's also exactly how I'd describe the idea of allowing all users to set
timezone without authentication on
Le mardi 04 janvier 2011 à 15:51 +, gpk a écrit :
> Actually, on consideration, I don't think that automatic detection of
> the timezone
> is a viable solution.It suffers from all kinds of potential problems
> like
> "What does it do if it's connected to a VPN?". If I connect via VPN
Le dimanche 02 janvier 2011 à 22:58 +, RnSC a écrit :
> Following up, new system. Gave up on getting 10.04 video to work on my
> system (another story), switched to 10.10.
>
> Created a user named "bugta", user 1001, group 1001.
>
> Tried to use System / Administration / Users and Groups to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 574046 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574046
Don't bother providing this information, this bug is already known and
has a fix in the lucid-proposed repository, which should be soon
uploaded to lucid-updates.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bu
We can't change PolicyKit permissions depending on whether the system is
a laptop or not. So we'd have to make the change for all systems, which
is not necessarily what people expect. And even laptops can be used e.g.
in kiosks or schools, where you don't want people to play with system
settings.
Everybody shouldn't be allowed to set the system timezone by default, as
it affects all users on the system. If you don't have administrator
rights on your laptop, you can ask the administrator to grant you the
rights for the org.gnome.clock.mechanism.settimezone PolicyKit action,
but this decision
Why do you think it is not a tzdata bug? time-admin merely shows
timezones as reported by /usr/share/zoneinfo/zone.tab, which is shipped
by tzdata, so the real bug must be there.
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged
** Changed in: tzdata (Ubuntu)
Users will surely know what UTC is, but they'll have to be pretty smart
to guess without further information all the implications using UTC on
the hardware clock has. As I said, the installer should just disable UTC
in hardware clock if Windows is already installed. If we provide an
option for ever
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #638375
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=638375
** Also affects: nautilus via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=638375
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543042
Title:
pressing CANCEL in policykit super user "mount di
Kamus: are you sure you checked in time-admin, and not in gnome-panel? I
still don't see Brasilia in time-admin...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458331
Ti
Instead of fixing your test package, your time would be better spent in
generating a debdiff from it, so that developers can just upload the fix
to Maverick. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/Debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
That's because unsound's package doesn't use a version name that is
superior to Maverick's. It should be 2.26.0-0ubuntu1+bigendian, or
something like that. As a general rule, using the very same version as
an existing package is not a good idea.
--
You received this bug notification because you a
Thanks for the report. Can you tell me exactly what settings you
changed? I suspect you changed the home directory and something went
wrong in that process. Are you able to reproduce the problem? Else,
there's no much I can do, sadly...
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Und
SRU request: makes several apps unusable for PPC users, among which
Evince, Empathy and users-admin. Patches are not intrusive, are
available from upstream GLib 2.26.1, and can also be applied to
Maverick's 2.26.0. Users have tested these patches and they work.
--
You received this bug notificati
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 685655 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685655
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 433851
Authentication dialog doesn't get focus
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 685655
PolicyKit authentication error: Only trusted callers (e.g.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 433851 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433851
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 433851
Authentication dialog doesn't get focus
* You can subscribe to bug 433851 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-c
This was tricky, but I've committed a fix upstream in liboobs and gnome-
system-tools. It will be available with 2.91.1 soon, for Natty.
** Also affects: gst
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gst
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 685655 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685655
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 685655
PolicyKit authentication error: Only trusted callers (e.g. uid 0) can use
CheckAuthorization() and pass details
* You can subscribe to bug 685655 by f
KeithG: What version exactly? Both are 2.32.0, what we need is the
-ubuntu part. It works here on Maverick. (Note you need to click the
unlock button after installing packages, which can be confusing - even
for me...)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Deskto
usermod always fails when trying to change the home for an active user.
This is very reasonable since many files are likely to be open, so
moving/removing them will fail.
I've changed users-admin upstream to disable the home dir field and show
and explanation notice in that case. This will be pres
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 685655 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685655
Thanks for the report. Why do you see in the title it occurs in Natty if
distro information says you're using Maverick (10.10)? This is important
to debug the problem.
Anyway, that's a duplicate of bug 685655
xlash911: are you seeing the same messages as the ones from the
description of this bug in /var/log/auth.log?
Andreas: does your problem still happen in 10.10?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-keyring in ubuntu.
h
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 542183 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542183
Yeah, that's a known bug that's going to be fixed soon in Lucid.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 542183
[users-admin] Changing UID doesn't work
* You can subscribe to bug 542183 by followin
Don't worry for the delays... some bugs are opened for years, often with
a higher priority! As regards the active/inactive issue, that would
likely be a bug in ConsoleKit.
users-admin is not going away today nor in the next year, else I
wouldn't even reply to bug reports. It's just that I don't pl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 221363 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221363
Hm, I hadn't read your two latter replies... Yes, the real question (see
duplicate report) is why remote sessions are considered as inactive. I
don't really understand whether they should be reported as active
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 221363 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221363
If the patch doesn't apply, that just means it's not meant for Maverick, it
can't be linked with the kind of bug you have. Trust me, it's the right fix. If
you want to try it by yourself, you can edit
/usr/
I've eventually pushed the fix to the system-tools-backends
upstream, it should be available in 2.10.2 for Natty.
Somebody should really go over all actions from
/usr/share/polkit-1/actions/ and file a new bug task for all actions
that don't consider as a valid case without a good reason.
** Ch
** Also affects: system-tools-backends
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221363
Title:
Policy Kit Unlock Butt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 221363 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221363
Ah, and what I said is actually exactly bug 221363, which I'm going to
fix now, so marking as duplicate.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 221363
Policy Kit Unlock Buttons Greyed Out when usin
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 221363 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221363
This is a mix of bug 685596, which is that users-admin doesn't report
authentication errors, and bug 187585, which is about
PolicyKit/ConsoleKit not detecting that remove sessions are active
users.
To mitigat
The button was moved in 2.32, which is present in Maverick.
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
Thanks. So everything works but the lock buttton, which means it's a bug
in polkit-gnome. The good news is, I'm going to stop using it in the
gnome-system-tools before the next release since it's not compatible
with GTK+ 3. We still need to find out what's going wrong, though - I'll
try to get more
You mean there's nothing else printed than:
** (polkitd:1752): DEBUG: system-bus-name::1.56 is inquiring whether
unix-process:2283:1752924 is authorized for
org.freedesktop.systemtoolsbackends.set
** (polkitd:1752): DEBUG: user of caller is unix-user:connor
** (polkitd:1752): DEBUG: user of subje
Oh, and are you able for example to install software upgrades using
updates-manager? Are you able to authenticate from from
System->Administration->Network connections?
** Summary changed:
- Polickit authentication error: Only trusted callers (e.g. uid 0) can use
CheckAuthorization() and pass de
Thanks for the report. Please run
sudo killall polkitd; sudo /usr/lib/policykit-1/polkitd
And reproduce the problem. Then, copy/paste the output of the above command
here.
Also, what's the output of
apt-cache policy libpolkit-gobject-1-0 libpolkit-gtk-1-0
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubunt
No, I don't think it is. ;-) As long as the right number is listed...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682
Title:
Backport system-tools-backends 2.10
Thanks for the diff!
Looks good to me, except that the change log line:
- Identify users and groups by login instead of UID (LP: #533870, LP: #542183)
is wrong: Bug 533870 is a crash on amd64 too, not a login vs. UID issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Ah, sorry, I didn't know you weren't using GNOME. The gnome-settings-
daemon part is not essential at all: the idea was only to use the PID of
a process that is known to be running - you can use any program name
here.
The polkitd log contains the explanation to your problem:
** (polkitd:1592): DEB
So it sounds like a PolicyKit issue. Please run
sudo killall polkitd; sudo /usr/lib/policykit-1/polkitd
start users-admin, and click on a button that doesn't work. Then please attach
the output here.
What happens if you run
export PID=`pidof gnome-settings-daemon`
pkcheck --action-id org.freedesk
Of course, it would be slightly better to fix users-admin not working as
root, rather than showing an error message, just in case some very
special distributions or users need this. But I'd accept a patch showing
a dialog too if it's well written... I don't think translators will mind
- if you thin
The gksu issue is not related at all, since users-admin doesn't use it
(else, that would mean it's running as root).
I suspect no user is shown in the list, or the current user isn't. Is it
the case? Can you test that by creating a test user using 'adduser' in a
console and check if it's enough?
You can just open the file after each time you validate a dialog by
clicking a button, and for example note somewhere what line was the last
at that point, and then mark this in the file by introducing comments.
You may also run the commands in a terminal without the "&> stb-
users.log" part, so th
You could, but I can sear you nobody will ever work on this because 1)
nobody usually works on users-admin except myself, and 2) users-admin is
going to be replaced, so we're not really fixing this kind of detail.
Feel free to provide a patch though, but filing a bug would really waste
your time...
But this is not a bug. You shouldn't run users-admin as root, as you
don't need to, and it potentially creates security issues.
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which
There's an error in the log file you provided, though. Could you check
when it exactly happens (e.g. when pressing OK for the password
dialog...)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu.
https://bu
Thanks for the report. Could you follow the procedure "For users [users-
admin]" at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingGnomeSystemTools and attach
the resulting files here? Also, I'd need you to run 'sudo killall
polkitd; sudo /usr/lib/policykit-1/polkitd' before you carry out the
other actions, and
What you should have said in the description is that this crash is very
close to bug 630884, which is reported to be fixed with nautilus
1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1.1.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 630884
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
* You can subscribe to bug 630
OK, let's say bug 683972 is the place where we track the crash that
still occurs with nautilus 1:2.32.0-0ubuntu1.1. What feels weird is that
the trace is very very similar, but let's see...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
Thanks Chris! But we really don't need to backport 2.10.1, 2.10.0 will
be enough. 2.10.1 only brings in a few improvements that are used by the
gnome-system-tools 2.32, which are not in Lucid. This removes most of
the changes (in terms of lines of code), which makes the SRU even safer.
--
Backpor
Seriously, I've moved on to other things since Lucid has been released -
glad to know SRUs are considered even when they are that old, though!
;-)
The only translation change between Lucid and Maverick package is in one
file and for two strings, so definitely not something to care about. If
somebo
Richard: It's fixed in Maverick, but still present in Lucid. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs, and especially
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status.
--
[users-admin] Changing UID doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542183
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 533870 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533870
Yeah, that's known but we need to backport fixes to Lucid.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 533870
Crash in SelfConfig on amd64
* You can subscribe to bug 533870 by following this link:
htt
Of course, we can pass --force-badname, but if we consider dots as
acceptable, adduser should accept them by default.
About chown, there's absolutely no need to change the tool, as long as
people that add dots to their usernames and use chown from the
commandline know what they are doing. Anyway,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 677929 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/677929
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 677929
users-admin: create new user with dot/period fails
* You can subscribe to bug 677929 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
What's the exact behavior of the installer? It doesn't use the same code
at all, so that's purely a coincidence it it suffers from the same
problem.
Don't worry about the importance, though: I'm currently discussing with
an adduser developer, and the fact that I set it to Low doesn't mean it
won't
I've committed both changes (stratum 1 and unreachable servers)
upstream. Thanks for the help! Of course, the proper fix would be
creating a pool, but better fix this in the short term.
Commits are 0fef206 and 8e01e05.
** Also affects: gst
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed i
Thanks for the report. This is indeed a synchronisation issue between
users-admin and adduser, the tool which is responsible for actually
creating users. I've filed a bug in Debian so they make adduser allow
dots in usernames.
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided =>
I can hardly imagine how the fact that you're running in VMWare should
change anything WRT authentication. More likely a config file was
edited... Or you weren't asked for authentication because you had just
provided your password for the same action a few seconds before.
Anyway, let's close this
Yeah, the latter result is more what I expected. There's a bug and a fix
for that, but nobody committed it for such a long time... Basically, you
can't use shares-admin since 10.04...
Be sure to remove /etc/init/nfs*, /etc/init.d/nfs*, /etc/init/samba and
/etc/init.d/samba if these files exist.
-
users-admin knows nothing about this authentication dialog, it's run by
PolicyKit-gnome. So the bug must affect all dialogs.
You should report this to upstream if you really want it to be fixed.
** Package changed: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) => policykit-gnome
(Ubuntu)
** Changed in: policykit-
I can't believe it. Can you remove these packages and reproduce the
problem? I've just done it here, and it's prompting an authentication
dialog.
Is that a new install of Maverick, or an upgraded system? Are you sure
you never played with system settings regarding authentication? Is
'sudo' asking
No idea, you should ask Chris Coulson or Sebastien Bacher on #ubuntu-
desktop about that. But of course replacing the users administration
tool shouldn't create any regressions, so better be on the safe side and
wait until all issues are solved.
--
Simplified About Me per specification
https://bu
As I said above, fixes are commits c84441 and 9211d2b. So:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?id=c84441
http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?id=9211d2b
It would be nice if you're ready to apply these patches and check they
fix the bug. But you may also test the latest GLib from Natty...
gnome-about-me is in gnome-control-center, not gnome-system-tools. But
note this tool is going to be deprecated in favor of accounts-dialog, so
I don't think it makes sense to work on gnome-about-me currently.
See
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-maverick-user-accounts-dialog
Indeed, thanks for these valuable details. When your bug is marked as
duplicate and you think you provided more information than the duplicate
report already has, please post them as a comment!
I've been able to reproduce the crash again, and I've let upstream
developers know how to do so, thus th
steubens: Are you still able to reproduce the bug on demande? Could you
give us precise instructions to reproduce it? Upstream developers would
need more informations to fix the bug.
--
evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651931
You received this b
Yes, that's most likely a duplicate. There's no real ETA, but the patch
has been committed in the series that will go into Natty, and it will
probably be released in a few weeks at most; then it will be up to
Ubuntu to backport it, but that shouldn't be an issue.
--
Installed GSettings schemas no
101 - 200 of 1348 matches
Mail list logo