Le samedi 15 septembre 2007, à 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
Ok, lets be fair: most people who care about hacking on GNOME already
know git, why should other options be selected?
I don't think it is fair to state this. A lot of people certainly care
about hacking on GNOME and don't
16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey:
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
- Keith Packard did a fairly extensive research of which DSCM
system
to use for xorg and other fd.o projects, from a storage robustness
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 18:26 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 21:31 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
I am wondering why discussion is continuing in the Git vs SVN (was:
Can we improve things?) thread, why the discussion is not happening
here instead ?!
I don't want to offend
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 09:10 +0100, John Carr wrote:
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 18:26 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 21:31 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
I am wondering why discussion is continuing in the Git vs SVN (was:
Can we improve things?) thread, why the discussion is not
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 09:42 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le samedi 15 septembre 2007, à 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
Ok, lets be fair: most people who care about hacking on GNOME already
know git, why should other options be selected?
I don't think it is fair to state this. A lot
2007/9/16, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ok, lets be fair: most people who care about hacking on GNOME already
know git, why should other options be selected? Seriously, kernel is
using it, freedesktop.org is using it, and KDE is considering it. Git
is one of those ones you need to
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 00:13 +0200, Jaap Haitsma wrote:
Hi
Talking to Daniel Cheese Siegel we asked ourselves:
Why do all GNOME projects have a ChangeLog file?
Isn't it redundant when you just save a commit message.
The problem is that centralised RCSs make it hard (no network, or
network
On 9/16/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
16 sep 2007 kl. 04.40 skrev Curtis Hovey:
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
- Keith Packard did a fairly extensive research of which DSCM
system
to use
I don't think choosing git just because others did is a good way of making
choices in general. Although I agree with you to some extend that choosing
the same than freedesktop makes some sense to keep the toolchain smaller.
I think that an impartial decision has to be made. I wonder if
Hi,
In Gnome Scan, i generate ChangeLog using svn2cl. See
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gnome-scan/trunk/Makefile.am and ChangeLog:
target. I also generate TODO from anjuta TODO.tasks. Note that
generating ChangeLog makes it lag one commit behind. You have to commit
and then update the ChangeLog.
On 9/16/07, Clytie Siddall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/09/2007, at 10:37 AM, Jorge González González wrote:
El dom, 16-09-2007 a las 00:26 +0200, Vincent Untz escribió:
I've reverted all the po files to revision 338 (ie, before this
commit),
except for gl, pt_BR and sv which were
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 09:10 +0100, John Carr wrote:
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 18:26 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 21:31 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
I am wondering why discussion is continuing in the Git vs SVN (was:
Can we improve things?) thread, why the discussion is not
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 14:00 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
Hi,
In Gnome Scan, i generate ChangeLog using svn2cl. See
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gnome-scan/trunk/Makefile.am and ChangeLog:
target. I also generate TODO from anjuta TODO.tasks. Note that
generating ChangeLog makes it lag one commit
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 09:42 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le samedi 15 septembre 2007, à 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
Ok, lets be fair: most people who care about hacking on GNOME already
know git, why should other options be selected?
I don't think it is fair to state this. A lot
On Sat, 2007-09-15 at 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Sun, 2007-09-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ali Sabil wrote:
I am also afraid that we might be just becoming nothing more but geek
fashion addicts trying to follow the latest RCS tendency without
really building solid and constructive
On 9/16/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le samedi 15 septembre 2007, à 21:44 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod a écrit :
Ok, lets be fair: most people who care about hacking on GNOME already
know git, why should other options be selected?
I don't think it is fair to state this. A lot of
On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 03:13:58PM +0200, Christian Rose wrote:
This is really different -- a Novell developer committing several
dozens of po files[1] without permission to SVN, in effect directly
altering upstream's sources without permission. Now that's a big
oops.
This seems resolved, but
Hi,
On 9/15/07, Jaap Haitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Talking to Daniel Cheese Siegel we asked ourselves:
Why do all GNOME projects have a ChangeLog file?
Isn't it redundant when you just save a commit message.
When I've seen projects just dump CVS or SVN log to ChangeLog,
typically the
On 9/16/07, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 9/15/07, Jaap Haitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Talking to Daniel Cheese Siegel we asked ourselves:
Why do all GNOME projects have a ChangeLog file?
Isn't it redundant when you just save a commit message.
When I've seen
19 matches
Mail list logo
