Il giorno gio, 29/07/2010 alle 17.31 +0200, daniel g. siegel ha scritto:
> you can find the effect files in the "gnome-video-effects" git
> repository on the usual place [1].
Daniel, do you have the time to provide a page on live.gnome.org showing
each effect applied to same image? It could be he
(Not sure if this is the proper mailing list, feel free to redirect
that to the proper one)
1.) Related to libbonobo, and all this CORBA stuff
Just to confirm that as GNOME 3.0 was released, libbonobo and all this
stuff will still be there with the gnome 2.32 release, so a11y team
(and any other
Am Mittwoch, den 04.08.2010, 13:38 +0200 schrieb Piñeiro:
> 1.) Related to libbonobo, and all this CORBA stuff
>
> Just to confirm that as GNOME 3.0 was released, libbonobo and all this
> stuff will still be there with the gnome 2.32 release, so a11y team
> (and any other one) can keep working on
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010, à 14:41 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I want to remove the GnomeDesktopItem API from gnome-desktop. It's an
> old API that is not needed anymore in our world with GKeyFile and
> GDesktopAppInfo.
This is now gone in master (but still there in the gnome-2-32 b
Hi,
I was thinking how to make sure we don't have a real issue with
gsettings and gconf at the same time for 2.32, and after some
discussion, it seems a simple solution would be to just not ship
gsettings-desktop-schemas as part of GNOME 2.32. This means GNOME 2.32
would have no shared gsettings k
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:55 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>
>- just release a new 2.30.x release with additional fixes: this is
> perfectly fine, especially if the development in master is
> explicitly targerted at GNOME 3. A good example here is gedit.
This can be problematic if a mo
From: Vincent Untz
> I was thinking how to make sure we don't have a real issue with
> gsettings and gconf at the same time for 2.32, and after some
> discussion, it seems a simple solution would be to just not ship
> gsettings-desktop-schemas as part of GNOME 2.32. This means GNOME 2.32
> would
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:20 +0200, Piñeiro wrote:
> From: Vincent Untz
>
> > I was thinking how to make sure we don't have a real issue with
> > gsettings and gconf at the same time for 2.32, and after some
> > discussion, it seems a simple solution would be to just not ship
> > gsettings-desktop
From: Bastien Nocera
> On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:20 +0200, Piñeiro wrote:
>> From: Vincent Untz
>>
>> > I was thinking how to make sure we don't have a real issue with
>> > gsettings and gconf at the same time for 2.32, and after some
>> > discussion, it seems a simple solution would be to just
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 12:55 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>>
>> - just release a new 2.30.x release with additional fixes: this is
>> perfectly fine, especially if the development in master is
>> explicitly targerted at GNOME 3.
thanks a lot gabor!
On Mi, 2010-08-04 at 00:43 +0200, Gabor Kelemen wrote:
> 2010-08-03 23:15 keltezéssel, Kenneth Nielsen írta:
> >> Here you go:
> >> http://l10n.gnome.org/module/gnome-video-effects/
> >>
> >> Translators: try msgmerge your existing cheese translation into the new pot
> >> file
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:28 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> What I would recommend in that case is to create a 2.32 branch off
> 2.30, and move master to 2.90. But I would not worry too much about
> distributors, we can generally handle version discontinuities (even if
> it is not nice and requi
12 matches
Mail list logo
