Hi Jens!
Didn't see this email until today.
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 2:30 AM Jens Georg wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am going to give up gexiv2 maintainership, for multiple reasons.
>
Ouch!
> One of them is that I have too many projects, the other one is I don't
> want to work with Exiv2 upstream an
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 17:44 +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Mathieu Bridon > > wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 16:47 +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>> > > IMO this is a co
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 16:47 +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>> IMO this is a completely broken and over-complicated workflow. For
>> long term contributors, having their own remote can be
>> understandable.
>>
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 3:55 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 08:50 -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote:
>> > Original Message
>> > Subject: Re: Proposal to deploy GitLab on gnome.org
>> > Local Time: May 17, 2017 2:10 PM
>> > UTC Time: May 17, 2017 12:10 PM
>> > Fr
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 04:25:09PM +0200, Jehan Pagčs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Carlos Soriano
>> wrote:
>> > Ah, I see what you mean now. But then you can rebase yourself in master
>> > right?
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> Ah, I see what you mean now. But then you can rebase yourself in master
> right? And the build time would be exactly the same no?
Not sure what you mean. You don't want to rebase master under any
circumstances (unless you rebase over o
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 06:36 -0400, Carlos Soriano via desktop-devel-
> list wrote:
>> Do you mean you don't like the extra step that is clicking once per
>> issue the "create merge request" button?
>
> I don't like the fact that the bug
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 13:54 +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Sébastien Wilmet
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:45:26AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:50 PM, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> So the main problem is autotools rebuilds everything when switching
> branches, even if the files didn't change?
> That's sounds very strange, autotools builds based on mtime of the files,
> and I checked this personally.
Yes that's ho
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:45:26AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 11:33 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
>> >
>>
>> > Most developers are more familiar with the GitHub workflow, I think
>> > it's
>> > an easier w
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:23 PM, Christoph Reiter
wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Jehan Pagès
> wrote:
>> The only thing I am annoyed at is this forking workflow. Both as a
>> contributor, and as a code committer/reviewer. Having to fetch a new
>> remote
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> Hey Jehan,
>
> Knowing that core contributors like you and GIMP maintainers will have
> access to the repo, are the sporadic contributions still many enough enough
Yes we still have regular one-time contributions. If anything, we are
t
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:15:51PM +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>> I don't share your optimism about gitlab bug tracking, nor do I share
>> in the mentioned frustration with bugzilla.
>
> Me too, I like bugzilla (but not for doin
Hi,
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 01:42:15AM +0200, Jehan Pagès wrote:
>> Github/gitlab wants to force you to fork the project into a public
>> repository on your private account so that you can make a pull
>> reque
Hi!
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Carlos Soriano via
desktop-devel-list wrote:
> Hello Mattias,
>
> Thanks for sharing your thoughs!
>
> Your concern is about using fast forward merge. Yes, we raised this concern
> as the top most important for us, and as we mention in the wiki we have good
>
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:30 AM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Perhaps I should jump in as I created the mirror alongside Andrea Veri.
>
> The mirror in general is quite useful, a lot of people fork projects and
> check them out automatically instead of checking them out from git.gnome.org
> and the
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Lasse Schuirmann
wrote:
> Is there any advantage of having those mirrors after all? Nobody really
> seems to care and I'm against adding a folder to trick a proprietary tool
> into not hurting us. It's read only anyway...
>
> (I have not followed all previous
Hello,
Speaking as one of the GIMP developers (which does not mean I speak on
behalf of the GIMP project here, but in my name). I certainly don't
want us to start using github, and actually would not care if we
stopped using it to mirror our repository. As you say yourself, this
is very confusing
Hello,
According to librsvg webpage, development discussions about this
library are to be held here.
I am one of the GIMP developer, and we have used librsvg already for
some time. But lately we are working on vectorial icons and I wanted
to use librsvg for icon extraction from a single source fil
19 matches
Mail list logo
