[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2078715] Re: [FFE] Upgrade lp-solve to 5.5.2.11-2 in oracular

2024-09-10 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hello Alessandro, Thank you for filing a descriptive FFe. Please consider this approved, go ahead! - u ** Changed in: lp-solve (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to lp-solve in Ubuntu.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2077461] Re: [draft] FFe: Install sysprof app in default Ubuntu install

2024-08-29 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Ok, this is just a seed change, sure. FFe approved. Unsubscribing ubuntu-release, please resubscribe if needed. ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to ubu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2077465] Re: FFe: enable sysprof integration for folks, gtk3, pango

2024-08-29 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Thanks for the nicely filed FFe. This all looks good. FFe approved for all 3. Unsubscribing ubuntu-release, please resubscribe if needed. ** Changed in: folks (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged ** Changed in: pango1.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2077997] Re: draft: FFe tracker rename to tinysparql & rename tracker-miners to localsearch

2024-08-29 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Apologies but this shows up on the Release team side. Once you're ready with the bug work, please subscribe ubuntu-release again. Many thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to tracker in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/b

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2077516] Re: [FFe] libreoffice 24.8.0 for oracular

2024-08-27 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Rico, Thanks for filing the FFe. The testing looks good. It'd be a nice idea to mention potential regressions that can occur despite your best testing coverage. Either way, I think it's good for now. Please consider this as an official ack. Go ahead. - u ** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2072699] Re: SRU: add a postinst script to rm livecd-rootfs' unminimize

2024-08-21 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
For ubuntu-meta, I can confirm this is working as the seeds are doing the right thing and unminimize is being pulled into main and is present in the images by default. Let's go! <3 ** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notific

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2072699] Re: SRU: add a postinst script to rm livecd-rootfs' unminimize

2024-08-08 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
signed) => Utkarsh Gupta (utkarsh) ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Utkarsh Gupta (utkarsh) ** Changed in: unminimize (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Utkarsh Gupta (utkarsh) ** Changed in: unminimize (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) =

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2056767] Re: FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) with gnome-software packaging split

2024-04-19 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
HI Jeremy, I am sorry that we couldn't get to it then. As you'd know the release team was swamped with so many things happening in the archive (time_64, xz CVE, et al). That said, I am still not sure if landing this now is a great idea. We're really close to the release and changing something like

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2056767] Re: FFe: Sync gnome-software 46.0-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) with gnome-software packaging split

2024-04-18 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, hi! Quick question, the main concern is about splitting of the .deb into multiple binaries. Can this not happen in the next cycle? I'm always hesitant to bring in changes for LTS at the eleventh hour? What do you think about that? ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: New =>

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2061857] Re: [FFe] enable the new GNOME OneDrive backend

2024-04-18 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey there, Thanks for filing an FFe. I think, as you mentioned, this is low risk since it doesn't change the existing features. The builds looks OK, please make sure to smoke test before uploading to the archive. That said, consider this FFe approved. Thanks, Utkarsh ** Changed in:

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1951586] Re: Need option to specify wifi regulatory domain

2023-10-31 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Is this fixed in Noble? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951586 Title: Need option to specify wifi regulatory domain Status in cloud-init: Invalid Status in

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2037642] Re: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

2023-10-31 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Also affects: mesa (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Juerg Haefliger (juergh) Status: Fix Released ** Also affects: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Dave Jones (waveform) Status: Fix Released ** Also affects: pipewire (Ub

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2013107] Re: [lunar] GNOME does not display high contrast app icons

2023-10-31 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Wait, I think this is already fixed in Noble, isn't it? In that case, if someone could confirm, could they adjust the bug status for Noble? ** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Also affects: gnome-themes-extra (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Unde

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2038761] Re: gnome-disk-utility does not give size of nvme disk

2023-10-12 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Tags added: regression-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to udisks2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038761 Title: gnome-disk-utility does not give size of nvme disk Status in udisks: New Status in u

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2038951] Re: Welcome To Ubuntu application not in specified language after installing offline.

2023-10-11 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
** Package changed: ubiquity (Ubuntu) => gnome-initial-setup (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-initial-setup in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038951 Title: Welcome To Ubuntu application not in sp

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2034664] Re: Meta.Rectangle is deprecated, use Mtk.Rectangle instead

2023-10-09 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock is not something that we (release team) are planning to accept ahead of Mantic release, so we're going to let it be in the unapproved queue and consider this for a 0-day SRU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages,

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2038783] Re: Exit code of locations mount script is not respecting error

2023-10-09 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hey, gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock is not something that we (release team) are planning to accept ahead of Mantic release, so we're going to let it be in the unapproved queue and consider this for a 0-day SRU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages,

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1991022] Re: [FFe] Socket activation

2022-09-29 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Hi Nathan, Thank you for filing the FFe bug. The bug is well documented and supported via attached logs and diff. Whilst this looks good for FFe, please wait for an ACK from the actual Release team member. Thanks! \o/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Pack

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1923505] Re: thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-06-02 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Aaah, I see. It looks like another problem then. Gotcha! Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923505 Title: thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el Status in thund

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1923505] Re: thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-06-02 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
This is awesome! Would you mind submitting to Debian as well? I can probably re-trigger the builds there to get this working and we can drop the delta at some point. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu. h

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1923505] Re: thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-05-28 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
Gee, I wonder what's up with ci.d.net; it's basically dead for ppc64el for thunderbird. I'll try to take a look at this on the Debian side when I have some time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu. https

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1923505] Re: thunderbird 78.9.0 FTBFS on ppc64el

2021-05-25 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
FWIW, this happens in Debian as well; cf: https://ci.debian.net/packages/t/thunderbird/unstable/ppc64el/. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to thunderbird in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923505 Title: thunderbird

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1917710] [NEW] Cannot render files

2021-03-03 Thread Utkarsh Moholkar
Public bug reported: Cannot render files ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-44.50~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18 Uname: Linux 5.8.0-44-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.16 Architecture: amd64 BootLog: Error: [Errno

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1884201] [NEW] package chromium-browser (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: new chromium-browser package pre-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2020-06-19 Thread Kumar Utkarsh
Public bug reported: when I'm trying to install chromium, it said that snap changes are in progress and that's why the installation process can't go through. so i aborted all snap changes and then tried installation. Though the app was installed it said that it couldn't find the following director

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1288655] Re: Terminal height shrinks - repeatedly restored shorter than the previous height

2020-06-08 Thread Utkarsh Gupta
It looks like some fixes were merged in GNOME/gtk: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/1606 . Waiting for them to be merged into ubuntu too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https:/

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1789438] [NEW] package libmozjs-52-0:amd64 52.9.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attem

2018-08-28 Thread Utkarsh Pal
Public bug reported: There is no effect in any functioning in the system, but just sometimes message occur showing this problem. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: libmozjs-52-0:amd64 52.9.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-30.32-generic 4.15.18 Uname: L

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1216512] Re: No sound/low sound in Ubuntu 13.04

2013-09-11 Thread Utkarsh Kumar
The arrow points inwards. It is somewhat like the 2nd icon shown on wikipedia link:(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Line_waves03-1-out.png/32px-Line_waves03-1-out.png) ...only the arrow is not pointed outwards and neither is it starting 'from' the center. It is rather mov

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1216512] Re: No sound/low sound in Ubuntu 13.04

2013-09-10 Thread Utkarsh Kumar
It worked! Thanks! This is what I did. First, I installed hda-jack-retask (http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/pulseaudio-discuss/2011-December/012342.html) Then, I used the command "hda-jack-retask" to open up the console. I used the first option, overide under 0x14. I also did the same for 0x1

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1216512] Re: No sound/low sound in Ubuntu 13.04

2013-09-09 Thread Utkarsh Kumar
And I have updated ubuntu twice since. Current kernel is 3.8.0-30-generic. The problem has still not been solved. @Raymond - I do have 3 jacks at the front: One is blue colored and by icon looks somewhat like RSS feed ones (I seriously don't know what this one is for). The second one is pink co

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1216512] Re: No sound/low sound in Ubuntu 13.04

2013-09-09 Thread Utkarsh Kumar
cd ~/ wget http://www.alsa-project.org/alsa-info.sh -O alsa-info.sh && bash alsa-info.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216512 Title: No sound/low sound in Ubunt

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1216512] Re: No sound/low sound in Ubuntu 13.04

2013-09-09 Thread Utkarsh Kumar
http://www.alsa- project.org/db/?f=f9672e29a767b96f69d6e5d90a6dffa2126208ab -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216512 Title: No sound/low sound in Ubuntu 13.04 Statu

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1216512] Re: No sound/low sound in Ubuntu 13.04

2013-08-26 Thread Utkarsh Kumar
Sorry, I meant 3.8.0-29 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216512 Title: No sound/low sound in Ubuntu 13.04 Status in “alsa-driver” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1216512] Re: No sound/low sound in Ubuntu 13.04

2013-08-26 Thread Utkarsh Kumar
@Daniel - I ran that command. The thing that I noticed is that, it gives me "Alsa-Driver (not installed)." Currently trying to run the sudo apt- get install to install it. But can't for now, as the Software updater has just given me a prompt to download another kernel (8.8.0-29). Maybe it gets solv

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 837907] Re: package gnome-icon-theme 2.31.0-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2011-08-31 Thread utkarsh
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to gnome-icon-theme in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/837907 Title: package gnome-icon-theme 2.31.0-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation scrip

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 837907] [NEW] package gnome-icon-theme 2.31.0-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2011-08-31 Thread utkarsh
Public bug reported: happened after installing GNOME3 and then reverting back. Now after every update these error comes ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: gnome-icon-theme 2.31.0-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generi