On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:02 -0700, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> with the merge in February, will development on the next iteration be open or
> closed? e.g. is this going to be a code dump or something more useful in the
> long term?
Total merge, long term useful. One tree to rule them all, etc.
Na
On Friday 23 December 2005 09:33, Nat Friedman wrote:
> As for the future, David has been planning to clean up what he's working
> on now and get it in a functional/mergeable state. The plan is to get
> it working and merged as soon as possible, but he's shooting
> specifically for XDevConf, which
On Friday 23 December 2005 09:33, Nat Friedman wrote:
> For the first 10 or 12 months of development, there was no material
> outside contribution to Xgl.
...
> largely functional state as fast as possible, without external drag.
so nobody was contributing to it (really implying nobo
On Friday 23 December 2005 17:33, Nat Friedman wrote:
> We'd like to make a splash with something that is largely functional.
> That way, the world will take notice of Xgl in a big way and Novell
> can get some credit for having been by far the principle sponsor of
> this development for more than
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 03:31 -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/165205/
Hey,
We have been sponsoring Xgl development here at Novell. David Reveman
has been devoting a large portion of his time to Xgl for the last
fifteen months or so. As far as I know, we are the only company (ie
On Thursday 22 December 2005 08:49, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> Shall I remind people how important eye-candy can be,
yes, eye candy is important. it's also important to recognize that XGL,
COMPOSITE and other such concept are allowing us to do things in the UI we
couldn't do that improve usability
On 22/12/05 06:31 am, Dan Kegel wrote:
> For those who haven't seen it already:
> a bit of controversy over closed development of Xgl:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/165205/
> http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2005/12/wouldnt-be-it-be-nice.html
The LWN article is restricted.
But there is this one too:
htt
For those who haven't seen it already:
a bit of controversy over closed development of Xgl:
http://lwn.net/Articles/165205/
http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2005/12/wouldnt-be-it-be-nice.html
--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
___
Desktop_arc
