Re: svn commit: r1480864 - in /accumulo: branches/1.5/ branches/1.5/assemble/ branches/1.5/core/ branches/1.5/examples/ branches/1.5/examples/simple/ branches/1.5/fate/ branches/1.5/proxy/ branches/1.

2013-05-09 Thread Christopher
Seems reasonable if the patch is ready. If it has already been applied, it'll come in, because when I cut an RC, I'm using the HEAD from the 1.5 branch. FYI, I'm not cutting RC3 just yet... still waiting on more feedback from RC2. For now, I'm just rolling back RC2 in svn because of the blockers r

Re: svn commit: r1480864 - in /accumulo: branches/1.5/ branches/1.5/assemble/ branches/1.5/core/ branches/1.5/examples/ branches/1.5/examples/simple/ branches/1.5/fate/ branches/1.5/proxy/ branches/1.

2013-05-09 Thread Corey Nolet
Could we roll in ACCUMULO-1380 since we're cutting a new RC? On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:48 PM, wrote: > Author: ctubbsii > Date: Fri May 10 02:48:47 2013 > New Revision: 1480864 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1480864 > Log: > ACCUMULO-970 roll back 1.5.0-RC2 > > Removed: > accumulo/tags/1.5

Re: Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-session-specific?

2013-05-09 Thread Keith Turner
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:47 AM, David Medinets wrote: > I'm asking in case I missed something in the documentation. This issue > hasn't arisen before since I haven't shared tables before. When I attach an > iterator to a table in the shell, it affects everyone (and every process) > that accesses t

Re: Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-session-specific?

2013-05-09 Thread David Medinets
There is a setscaniter shell command that I had missed. Thanks, David L! On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 10:39 AM, David Medinets wrote: > Yes. But it seems like anything accessing that table also uses that > iterator. > > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:49 AM, John Vines wrote: > >> You can declare iterator

Re: Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-session-specific?

2013-05-09 Thread David Medinets
Yes. But it seems like anything accessing that table also uses that iterator. On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:49 AM, John Vines wrote: > You can declare iterators to use at scan time. > > Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity. > On May 9, 2013 9:48 AM, "David Medinets" wrote: > > >

Re: Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-session-specific?

2013-05-09 Thread John Vines
You can declare iterators to use at scan time. Sent from my phone, please pardon the typos and brevity. On May 9, 2013 9:48 AM, "David Medinets" wrote: > I'm asking in case I missed something in the documentation. This issue > hasn't arisen before since I haven't shared tables before. When I att

Can Iterators be made user-specific or shell-session-specific?

2013-05-09 Thread David Medinets
I'm asking in case I missed something in the documentation. This issue hasn't arisen before since I haven't shared tables before. When I attach an iterator to a table in the shell, it affects everyone (and every process) that accesses that table. Is there a standard of practice? Do people clone tab