On March 28, 2014, 6:53 p.m., kturner wrote:
docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext, line 139
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/1/?file=539855#file539855line139
A walog or bulk imported file could be referenced by multiple tablets.
I am wondering if it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#review39049
---
Josh, after I converted your doc to markdown I should have sent it
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#review39051
---
docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext
On March 31, 2014, 4:13 p.m., kturner wrote:
Josh, after I converted your doc to markdown I should have sent it to you
and let you post it to RB. I was so excited about experimenting w/
reviewing design docs on RB that I did not really think that part through.
Josh, what do you
On March 31, 2014, 4:21 p.m., kturner wrote:
docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext, line 34
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/1/?file=539855#file539855line34
Can a table be replicated to multiple clusters?
More specifically, can a table on one cluster be
On March 31, 2014, 4:13 p.m., kturner wrote:
Josh, after I converted your doc to markdown I should have sent it to you
and let you post it to RB. I was so excited about experimenting w/
reviewing design docs on RB that I did not really think that part through.
Josh, what do you
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19804/#review39056
---
server/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/Accumulo.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19749/#review39059
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Bill Havanki
On March 27, 2014, 4:25 p.m.,
On March 31, 2014, 4:21 p.m., kturner wrote:
docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext, line 34
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/1/?file=539855#file539855line34
Can a table be replicated to multiple clusters?
kturner wrote:
More specifically, can a
On March 28, 2014, 2:53 p.m., kturner wrote:
docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext, line 157
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/1/?file=539855#file539855line157
Are you thinking a FATE operation per file? FATE uses zookeeper, and
zookeeper keeps
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/#review39061
---
docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext
On March 31, 2014, 4:21 p.m., kturner wrote:
docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext, line 80
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/1/?file=539855#file539855line80
Whats the rational for replicating WAL as opposed to replicating minor
compacted rfiles? What
On March 28, 2014, 6:53 p.m., kturner wrote:
docs/src/main/resources/design/ACCUMULO-378-design.mdtext, line 119
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19790/diff/1/?file=539855#file539855line119
Seems like accumulo should have a public API for querying what needs to
be replicated,
On March 29, 2014, 12:26 a.m., kturner wrote:
server/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/master/Master.java, line 313
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19804/diff/1/?file=539926#file539926line313
I think this check can cause problems. Master.run() starts
StatusThread,
On March 29, 2014, 12:26 a.m., kturner wrote:
server/src/main/java/org/apache/accumulo/server/master/Master.java, line 313
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19804/diff/1/?file=539926#file539926line313
I think this check can cause problems. Master.run() starts
StatusThread,
I looked at the 1.4 and 1.6 branches and its not set in either. This
certainly needs a ticket.
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Ed Coleman d...@etcoleman.com wrote:
I was looking to profile some long running scans and tried to use the scan
id to correlate long running scans between
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19732/
---
(Updated March 31, 2014, 7:36 p.m.)
Review request for accumulo.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19862/
---
Review request for accumulo.
Bugs: ACCUMULO-378
18 matches
Mail list logo