Summary of coworking day

Just to keep everyone who wasn't present in the loop today: We had another coworking day today in MD. Looking back, I don't think we remembered to send out a general poll for interest (if we didn't, I'm terribly sorry). We had a few shared discussions. I gave an (as-brief-as-possible) overvi

Re: Review Request 30236: Reorganize README

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/#review69730 --- Ship it! Thanks for improving these, Keith! It looks great! - Josh

Re: Review Request 30236: Reorganize README

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/ --- (Updated Jan. 26, 2015, 11:47 p.m.) Review request for accumulo. Changes

Re: Review Request 30236: Reorganize README

> On Jan. 26, 2015, 6:19 p.m., Mike Walch wrote: > > README.md, line 35 > > > > > > Could link to Javadocs here > > > > `The public [Accumulo API][13] is composed` > > > > [13]: http://accumulo.apache.

Re: Planning for (eventual) removal of instance.dfs.{uri,dir}

Revisiting this, I've created ACCUMULO-3535. -- Christopher L Tubbs II http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Christopher wrote: > I spoke with Keith a bit offline, and he suggested a different path: > > Have an intermediate release which requires use of instance.volumes

Re: Review Request 30280: ACCUMULO-3533 Making AbstractInputFormat.getConfiguration() protected to match backwards compatibility with 1.6.1

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30280/#review69674 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Josh Elser On Jan. 26, 2015, 7:04 p.m., Core

Re: Review Request 30280: ACCUMULO-3533 Making AbstractInputFormat.getConfiguration() protected to match backwards compatibility with 1.6.1

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30280/ --- (Updated Jan. 26, 2015, 7:04 p.m.) Review request for accumulo, Sean Busbey, Ch

Re: Review Request 30280: ACCUMULO-3533 Making AbstractInputFormat.getConfiguration() protected to match backwards compatibility with 1.6.1

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30280/ --- (Updated Jan. 26, 2015, 2:02 p.m.) Review request for accumulo, Sean Busbey, Ch

Re: Review Request 30236: Reorganize README

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/#review69645 --- BUILD.md "

Re: Review Request 30280: ACCUMULO-3533 Making AbstractInputFormat.getConfiguration() protected to match backwards compatibility with 1.6.1

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30280/ --- (Updated Jan. 26, 2015, 6:55 p.m.) Review request for accumulo, Sean Busbey, Ch

Re: Review Request 30280: ACCUMULO-3533 Making AbstractInputFormat.getConfiguration() protected to match backwards compatibility with 1.6.1

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30280/ --- (Updated Jan. 26, 2015, 6:55 p.m.) Review request for accumulo, Sean Busbey, Ch

Re: Review Request 30280: ACCUMULO-3533 Making AbstractInputFormat.getConfiguration() protected to match backwards compatibility with 1.6.1

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30280/ --- (Updated Jan. 26, 2015, 6:53 p.m.) Review request for accumulo, Sean Busbey, Ch

Review Request 30280: ACCUMULO-3533 Making AbstractInputFormat.getConfiguration() protected to match backwards compatibility with 1.6.1

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30280/ --- Review request for accumulo, Sean Busbey, Christopher Tubbs, Eric Newton, Josh E

Re: Review Request 30252: ACCUMULO-3531 update japi-compliance-check configs.

Yup, I did! I meant to comment on the JIRA issue but got side-tracked :D On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Corey Nolet wrote: > I believe Josh just committed a fix for the missing license header. > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > >> >> ---

Re: Review Request 30252: ACCUMULO-3531 update japi-compliance-check configs.

I believe Josh just committed a fix for the missing license header. On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Mike Drob wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/30252/#review69636 >

Re: Review Request 30252: ACCUMULO-3531 update japi-compliance-check configs.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30252/#review69636 --- test/compat/japi-compliance/exclude_classes.txt

Re: Review Request 30236: Reorganize README

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30236/#review69627 --- INSTALL.md

Re: Review Request 30252: ACCUMULO-3531 update japi-compliance-check configs.

> On Jan. 26, 2015, 5:15 p.m., kturner wrote: > > test/compat/japi-compliance/japi-accumulo-1.6.2.xml, line 18 > > > > > > are all of the 1.6.X files the same? Could we make a 1.6 template and > > have sed comment in

Re: Review Request 30252: ACCUMULO-3531 update japi-compliance-check configs.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30252/#review69621 --- test/compat/japi-compliance/japi-accumulo-1.6.2.xml