Thanks. Changes made and notes pushed to the website.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Michael Wall wrote:
> Follow on to
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/962102c6c3745b759a2d94d59d40b7f213f2013bfdc7f9d6bc7ef48f@%3Cdev.accumulo.apache.org%3E
>
> Feedback for draft release notes at
> http
Follow on to
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/962102c6c3745b759a2d94d59d40b7f213f2013bfdc7f9d6bc7ef48f@%3Cdev.accumulo.apache.org%3E
Feedback for draft release notes at
https://github.com/madrob/accumulo/blob/gh-pages/release_notes/1.7.2.md
1 - Should link to Jira in the third sentence be to
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:21 PM Mike Drob wrote:
> This vote passes with 5 +1.
>
> Maven repository has been promoted.
> Release tag has been pushed, but this is the wrong one. See INFRA-12153.
>
This has been fixed. I was in HipChat earlier and nagged a bit. Infra
unlocked the tags, so I could
Email is probably easiest. Or patch/pull request if you're feeling
ambitious. Either way, let's start a new thread for it.
Thanks for looking!
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Michael Wall wrote:
> Mike,
>
> How do you want feedback on the release notes? Just in email?
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016
Mike,
How do you want feedback on the release notes? Just in email?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> This vote passes with 5 +1.
>
> Maven repository has been promoted.
> Release tag has been pushed, but this is the wrong one. See INFRA-12153.
> Artifacts have been pushed to
This vote passes with 5 +1.
Maven repository has been promoted.
Release tag has been pushed, but this is the wrong one. See INFRA-12153.
Artifacts have been pushed to dist.
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/accumulo/1.7.2/
Updated Apache Reporter with Release Info.
Closed JIRA version and
Sure, www.warp10.io.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 10:38 PM, wrote:
>
> Never heard of Warp 10. Do you have a link?
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Mathias Herberts"
> To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:23:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Publicity/blog on Timely
>
> Hav
Never heard of Warp 10. Do you have a link?
- Original Message -
From: "Mathias Herberts"
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 4:23:36 PM
Subject: Re: Publicity/blog on Timely
Have you considered starting with Warp 10 instead of OpenTSDB?
On Wed, Jun 22, 20
Have you considered starting with Warp 10 instead of OpenTSDB?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 9:38 PM, wrote:
> We have discussed giving a presentation at the Accumulo Summit, nothing
> beyond that at the moment though.
>
> - Original Message -
>
> From: "Josh Elser"
> To: dev@accumulo.apache.
Haven't added up the sum, but my guess is that this vote passed.
Mike has already started working on tagging/publishing artifacts, but ran
into a snag when the wrong branch was unintentionally tagged.
Waiting on INFRA for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-12153
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 7
In the Grafana U/I you can specify a set of tags for the metric query. We take
the first tag and seek to it, then take the remaining tags in the query and
filter on them. Specifying the tags in the metric query in order of more
specific to less specific will give better performance. I thought I
Fascinating stuff, thanks!
Can I ask, what's the motivation for permuting the tagKey+tagValues between
the CF and CQ in the metrics table? It doesn't seem like it would optimize
any queries unless you defined locality groups for some or all
tagKey+tagValue pairs. In the example in the readme, woul
We have discussed giving a presentation at the Accumulo Summit, nothing beyond
that at the moment though.
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Elser"
To: dev@accumulo.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2016 3:28:48 PM
Subject: Publicity/blog on Timely
My single word "Awesome" really
My single word "Awesome" really doesn't give justice to how excited I am
about this. I've long hoped that we'd be able to push Accumulo to fit
well into the time-series realm (due to our ability to handle writes
very well -- sans the inherent limitations of the BigTable architecture
I suppose).
Awesome!
dlmar...@comcast.net wrote:
Timely is a time series database application that provides secure access to
time series data. It is designed to be used with Apache Accumulo for
persistence and Grafana for visualization. Timely is located at
https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/timel
Timely is a time series database application that provides secure access to
time series data. It is designed to be used with Apache Accumulo for
persistence and Grafana for visualization. Timely is located at
https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/timely .
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/119
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user ctubbsii commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/119
I'm not sure why or when the "true" parameter should be used in the cases
where it currently is used (in ClusterUser, randomwalk Environment, and the
cluster harness classes). They don't appear to
Github user mjwall commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/119
Great, thanks @ctubbsii
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user ctubbsii commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/119
@mjwall I can merge and modify our usage of the deprecated method,
according to the discussion above.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user mjwall commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/119
Is this ready to be merged?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
GitHub user mjwall opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/120
ACCUMULO-4324 update data version
This PR adds a new DATA_VERSION
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mjwall/accumulo ACCUMULO-4324
22 matches
Mail list logo
