Re: [DISCUSS] Htrace4, Hadoop 2.7

I'm sure I know some people trying to use Accumulo+HDFS tracing, and it's going to cause a problem no matter what, because Hadoop and Accumulo aren't always upgraded at the same time. I just want to make sure it gets better at some point, if both are sufficiently up-to-date. Backporting patches

Re: [DISCUSS] Htrace4, Hadoop 2.7

Ah, my mistake. I thought it was 2.7 and later. Well, then I guess the question is whether we should bump to 2.8, then. I'm not a fan of the shim layer. I'd rather provide support for downstream packagers trying to backport for HTrace3, if anybody ends up requiring that, than provide a shim to

Re: [DISCUSS] Htrace4, Hadoop 2.7

I'm in favor of bumping our Hadoop version to 2.7. We are already on the same htrace version as Hadoop 2.7. (The discussion in ACCUMULO-4171 is relevant to Hadoop 2.8 and later.) Billie On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Christopher wrote: > Thinking about

[DISCUSS] Htrace4, Hadoop 2.7

Thinking about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-4171, I'm of the opinion that we should probably bump our Hadoop version to 2.7 and HTrace version to what Hadoop is using, to keep them in sync. Does anybody disagree?

[GitHub] accumulo issue #121: ACCUMULO-4353: Stabilize tablet assignment during trans...

Github user keith-turner commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/121 > Indeed, I found this out when I went to implement my idea. I just noticed that commit. I can look over those changes today. I like the idea of changing save to an enum. --- If

[GitHub] accumulo issue #121: ACCUMULO-4353: Stabilize tablet assignment during trans...

Github user ShawnWalker commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/121 > I took a quick look and it seemed a tserver did not know why it was unloading. It seems like the tserver would need to know why it was unloading so it could only suspend when being stopped

[GitHub] accumulo issue #121: ACCUMULO-4353: Stabilize tablet assignment during trans...

Github user keith-turner commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/pull/121 > My current thought would be to make unloading a tablet this way suspend the tablet instead of unassigning I took a quick look and it seemed a tserver did not know why it was