I think lazy concensus is ok. As long as no one has any objections I would
think it's ok to move ahead with it under PMC control as Tim pointed out.
But Tim is right that should give it 72 hours for people to see the thread
and comment.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> D
Do we a vote even for that? It seemed a no brainer.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 6:56 PM Michael André Pearce <
michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote:
> Should be deactivated now.
>
>
>
> > On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:51, Michael André Pearce <
> michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote:
> >
> > That would be my apolo
Should be deactivated now.
> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:51, Michael André Pearce
> wrote:
>
> That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it would
> work. I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst we await
> the time to elapse.
>
> Please accept my apologie
That would be my apologies on that i was setting up to make sure it would work.
I didn’t realise the ramifications I will disable it whilst we await the time
to elapse.
Please accept my apologies
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:49, Timothy Bish wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2017 06:40 P
On 11/01/2017 06:40 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC.
Problem being that there is now a "official" ActiveMQ twitter account
that is not currently owned or controlled by the PMC
Agreed PMC ultimately will have overall control.
This is why the mail before about the “owner” account to be the PMC.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:24, Timothy Bish wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
>> Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1632
the build finished fine.. don't know why it didn't update it heres
---
On 11/01/2017 06:13 PM, Michael André Pearce wrote:
Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as we set this
up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but not all)
Ultimately the PMC needs to decide which committers would be given
access as per the Apach
Also a shout out for committers and pmc, if you want to be added as we set this
up we will need your twitter handles (I have some peoples but not all)
Cheers
Mike
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Nov 2017, at 22:11, Michael André Pearce
> wrote:
>
> I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the inter
I have sent a mail to the PMC. But in the interest of being open, will share on
the Dev mail list also.
We are slowly setting this up to check all would work etc etc.
We have set the “owner” account to the private pmc mail address as per Apache
guidelines, it seems there might be some filter on
On 11/01/2017 02:53 AM, Justin Bertram wrote:
I would like to propose an Apache ActiveMQ Artemis 2.4.0 release.
We had these new features and improvements added as part of 2.4.0:
[ARTEMIS-534] - Allow JMX configuration from broker.xml
[ARTEMIS-1447] - JDBC NodeManager to support JDBC HA Shared
GitHub user clebertsuconic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1632
NO-JIRA fixes
Just a few tweaks.. no semantic changes that would warrant a JIRA.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.co
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1631
ARTEMIS-1492 obfuscate passwords in acceptorControl
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis ARTEMI
GitHub user jbertram opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1630
NO-JIRA updating release documentation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jbertram/activemq-artemis master_work
Altern
Github user michaelandrepearce closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1607
---
Github user michaelandrepearce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1607
Closing this for now
---
Ok...I consider it fixed.. removed my -1.. I will do some more work
before sending my vote.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Justin Bertram wrote:
> Should be fixed now. Let me know if I messed up. :)
>
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
>
>> Actually, I
Should be fixed now. Let me know if I messed up. :)
Justin
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> Actually, I don't need to -1
>
>
> just git tag again on top of that... re-upload the tag.
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Clebert Suconic
> wrote:
> > -1
> >
> > The 2.
Actually, I don't need to -1
just git tag again on top of that... re-upload the tag.
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> -1
>
> The 2.4.0 is at 8a5961c805b3926b0932d5c1e826238ba88d2674, while the
> same commit on master is at ec63189a0a8235fc0436d9554bcdf323944e1bf6
>
> (f
-1
The 2.4.0 is at 8a5961c805b3926b0932d5c1e826238ba88d2674, while the
same commit on master is at ec63189a0a8235fc0436d9554bcdf323944e1bf6
(for the record, I spoke to Justin... it happened that he squahsed the
upgrade to extra tests on the same commit.. while the tag was on a
different commit).
Twitter for a group account has a nice level of owner, admin and user, that
means committers can login with their own accounts and no one need the
master/owners password for day to day, the owner account just needed to reset
bits if ever needed.
Owner = private pmc email (once we’ve setup all,
Yes, I would set it up sort it out then finally transfer the owner to private
mail list so pmc have control
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Nov 2017, at 13:36, Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> Any official project social media account needs to be under control the
> project PMC, refer to
> https://www.apac
GitHub user stanlyDoge opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1629
ARTEMIS-1486 Core client should be notified if consumer is closed on â¦
â¦broker side
If consumer is closed on broker using e.g. Hawtio console, client connected
as that con
Github user gaohoward commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1621
@clebertsuconic ok, I'll do it.
---
Dear Team,
I have a requirement to consume a messages from queue as below example,
Example:
1) I have 100 messages in a incoming queue
2) 100 messages are submitted from 10 different users with identification of
selector.
(Assumes 10 different users, it may be change the users count dynamica
Github user clebertsuconic commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1621
@gaohoward if you can just update the PR? This is exactly what I was
testing.. so I would do the verifications.
On this case please keep your committs separate please? just
Github user gaohoward commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1621
turns out my PR indeed broke the other tests. I have a fix for that and
I'll update the PR soon, after making sure there is no more regressions.
---
Any official project social media account needs to be under control the
project PMC, refer to
https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/socialmedia
On 11/01/2017 09:22 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
+1
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM,
+1
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> wrote:
> > No objection from my side.
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce" <
> michael.andre.pea...@me.com> wrote:
> >>Hi A
+1
On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> No objection from my side.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Nov 1, 2017, 07:07, at 07:07, "Michael André Pearce"
> wrote:
>>Hi All,
>>
>>I would like to create an apacheactivemq twitter account, to increase
>>the presence there. Similar to
Github user RaiSaurabh commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1628
For sorting purpose AngularJS grid internal sorting should be enough for
sorting columns. I checked it was not sorting on other tabs as well
(Connections, Sessions, Consumers, Producers
GitHub user RaiSaurabh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/1628
ARTEMIS-1364: Enable internal sorting in Hawtio web console
Enabled default sorting on the Hawtio web console.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$
32 matches
Mail list logo
