Hi All,
Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now resolved.
I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
check it and vote accordingly.
This release effectively will be the first release of a NMS AMQP client..
Also includes some modernisatio
+1 (non binding)
Regards
JB
On 31/10/2019 16:18, Michael Pearce wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now resolved.
>
> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
> check it and vote accordingly.
>
> This release effe
+1 (non-binding)
Kudos to Michael and Krzysztof for taking this on and completing it. I'm
happy to see it move forward.
Ragnar
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now
> resolved.
>
> I have put
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 12:53 PM Ragnar Paulson
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Kudos to Michael and Krzysztof for taking this on and completing it. I'm
> happy to see it move forward.
>
> Ragnar
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
>
+1 (non-binding)
Build the package on linux and windows
Ran the unit tests, passed
Ran the interop tests, passed (against two brokers)
Thanks for all the work put into this.
Chris Morgan
-
Chris Morgan
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-Dev-f2368404.html
+1 (Binding)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now resolved.
>
> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
> check it and vote accordingly.
>
> This release effectiv
+1 (non-binding)
Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box
and remove the test dir content using terminal (successfully).
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:47 PM Clebert Suconic
wrote:
> +1 (Binding)
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 11:18 AM Michael Pearce
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi
Hi PMC
Just need one more binding vote. If someone could be so kind?
Best
Mike
Get Outlook for Android
On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 4:56 PM +, "Krzysztof" wrote:
+1 (non-binding)
Apart from what Chris has done, I've tried to unzip package on Linux box
and remove the t
My reading of the Apache documentation on release approval [1] indicates
you've already got the required votes for the release to pass. It says:
For a release vote to pass, a minimum of three positive votes and more
positive than negative votes MUST be cast. Releases may not be vetoed.
Votes cas
+1 (Binding)
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 3:18 PM Michael Pearce
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Thanks all how reviewed rc1, hopefully all the points raised are now
> resolved.
>
> I have put together a second spin for a Apache NMS AMQP release, please
> check it and vote accordingly.
>
> This release effectiv
Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding
+1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to
have at least 3 active members or be considered for the attic, as it
is the PMC that must agree to the release happening.
I'd agree the page you linked isnt rea
Thanks for the clarification, Robbie. The link you provided was helpful.
Cheers!
Justin
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 11:13 AM Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding
> +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs needed to
> have at
Hi,
I agree with Robbie.
I didn't vote due to my lack of knowledge on the NMS part. So, I would
like to take more time to be familiar with this part before casting a
vote (my vote is non binding anyway as I'm not PMC member).
However, you already got three binding votes so you are good to close
In case you originally meant to direct it elsewhere instead...you
actually did cast the first vote in the thread.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I agree with Robbie.
>
> I didn't vote due to my lack of knowledge on the NMS part. So, I would
> like to take mor
+1 Binding (just so its clear for the records)
As now have 3 bindings, i will shortly send the result mail.
On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:13, Robbie Gemmell
wrote:
> Historically at least it was always the that case you needed 3 binding
> +1 votes minimum (and more + than -), which is why PMCs need
Results of the Apache NMS AMQP 1.8.0 - RC2 release vote.
Vote passes with 8 votes.
The following votes were received:
+1 Votres:
Binding
Michael Andre Pearce
Clebert Suconic
Martyn Taylor
Non Binding:
Chris Morgan
Duane Pauls
Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Ragnar Paulson
Krzysztof Porebski
There were
Sorry, I meant for Artemis Native vote, sorry for the cross meaning.
Regards
JB
On 06/11/2019 18:31, Robbie Gemmell wrote:
> In case you originally meant to direct it elsewhere instead...you
> actually did cast the first vote in the thread.
>
> On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 at 17:19, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
17 matches
Mail list logo
