Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-11 Thread Francois Papon
It make sense for the roadmap, may be it could be a dedicated page on the website? regards, François fpa...@apache.org Le 11/07/2019 à 15:41, Bruce Snyder a écrit : > Agreed, a clear roadmap must be defined. We should create a new wiki page > for an overall ActiveMQ project roadmap that includes

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-11 Thread Bruce Snyder
Agreed, a clear roadmap must be defined. We should create a new wiki page for an overall ActiveMQ project roadmap that includes info for all the ActiveMQ components (ActiveMQ, ActiveMQ Artemis, ActiveMQ NMS and ActiveMQ CMS). There is already an ActiveMQ Artemis Roadmap wiki page, is this info stil

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-11 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
Can I suggest calling out what gaps there might be in the roadmap where people can dig in and help? I don't know what level of commitment the project is looking for, but I'd like to get involved, and pointers to things that need doing so folks can sign up to them could be helpful. I'd state an inte

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-10 Thread michael . andre . pearce
Like wise in a roadmap for our project we need to be also clear on the direction for Artemis. We definitely dont want to be flip flopping. We had spelt out a roadmap last year. The project already did one big flip flop with apollo. It erodes all end users trust, and they have no clear d

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-10 Thread michael . andre . pearce
Before any votes. I think it needs a little more discussion to see where the tide is going. You need to engage people in that discussion. Likewise i think a little more than just a line or two is needed for a proposal, need to be clear who is committing to what and thoughts about ensuring cl

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-10 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Fair enough. Anyway, I'm moving forward on 5.15.10 & 5.16.0 releases preparation reviewing/fixing/merging. About the "roadmap", I will start a formal vote. Regards JB On 09/07/2019 12:08, Christopher Shannon wrote: > There was almost no discussion on the proposals for 5.x. Almost no one > resp

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-09 Thread Christopher Shannon
There was almost no discussion on the proposals for 5.x. Almost no one responded and there was no consensus so definitely a -1 from me to include anything about JMS 2.0, cloud features or any other features like that for 5.x on the board report until it is discussed and the community has a consens

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-08 Thread michael . andre . pearce
There was feedback i gave some on that thread. Get Outlook for Android On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 5:43 AM +0100, "Jean-Baptiste Onofré" wrote: It's just worth to mention, there's no feedback for now. Anyway, as a community effort, I don't see any blocker. About the releases, it

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
It's just worth to mention, there's no feedback for now. Anyway, as a community effort, I don't see any blocker. About the releases, it's straight forward as it's maintenance and improvements on existing branches. Regards JB Le 9 juil. 2019 à 02:44, à 02:44, Clebert Suconic a écrit: >I don’

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-08 Thread Clebert Suconic
I don’t think the community reached a consensus in order to include on the report. If you want to mention it on the report mention the discussion didn’t reach a consensus yet. On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:58 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > I would like to contribute with the two e-m

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-08 Thread michael . andre . pearce
I have provided some updates for Artemis and NMS. Get Outlook for Android On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:01 PM +0100, wrote: Hi Bruce, Just travelling atm. Will try to add some bits later this evening. I also need to complete the release of nms api, updating the website and se

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-08 Thread michael . andre . pearce
Hi Bruce, Just travelling atm. Will try to add some bits later this evening. I also need to complete the release of nms api, updating the website and sending an announcement mail. Best Mike Get Outlook for Android On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 4:40 PM +0100, "Bruce Snyder" wrote:

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-08 Thread Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Hi Bruce, I would like to contribute with the two e-mails sent about ActiveMQ: - 5.15.10 & 5.16.0 releases preparation - Roadmap proposal (JMS 2.0, JDK 11 support, ...) - Cloud friendly features Unfortunately I don't have the permission to edit the wiki page. Can you grant permission to my user

Re: Board Report Time

2019-07-08 Thread Bruce Snyder
This is a reminder that your contributions to the Board report are urgently needed this week! The report is due in two days and currently there have been zero contributions. Please take a few minutes to report on project activity here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?page

Board Report Time

2019-07-05 Thread Bruce Snyder
It's time once again to create a report for the ASF Board for July 2019. Your contribution only takes five minutes, so please report project activity for any of the ActiveMQ projects on the wiki page below: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=120728511 This report is

Re: Board Report Time - New Year Edition

2019-01-08 Thread Bruce Snyder
A big thank you to both Jean-Baptiste Onofré and Michael André Pearce for contributing to this report! Thanks for taking the time to outline some of the activities on the project guys! I will submit the report today to the ASF board for next week's meeting. Bruce On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 7:00 PM

Board Report Time - New Year Edition

2018-12-30 Thread Bruce Snyder
Please contribute to the ASF board report for January 2019. All it takes is five minutes to report project activity for any of the ActiveMQ modules on the wiki page below: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=99844486 This report is due to by Jan 9, 2019. Happy New Ye