Re: "Breeze" dev environment

2019-09-04 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey Elena, All, Since we have solved some teething problems with Breeze I agreed with Elena that we clearly separate out the two environments we have for Airflow - Local Virtualenv and Breeze. I prepared a doc-only PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6001 where advantages/disadvantages of us

Re: Setting to add choice of schedule at end or schedule at start of interval

2019-09-04 Thread Daniel Standish
Re: > For example, if I need to run a DAG every 20 minutes between 8 AM and 4 > PM... This makes a lot of sense! Thank you for providing this example. My initial thought of course is "well can't you just set it to run */20 between 7:40am and 3:40pm," but I don't think that is possible in cron

Re: Setting to add choice of schedule at end or schedule at start of interval

2019-09-04 Thread James Coder
I can’t see how adding a property to Dagrun that is essentially identical to next_execution_date would add any benefit. The way I see it the issue at hand here is not the availability of dates. There are plenty of options in the template context for dates before and after execution date. My view po

Re: Proposal: Automatically mark stale PRs in github

2019-09-04 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hello everyone, ACTION NEEDED BY ALL CONTRIBUTORS: Please add comment to the PRs that you are still working and you got notified that they are marked as "stale". If you do not comment on those PRs, they will be automatically closed in a week by the stalebot. Suddenly the stalebot started to work

Re: Codecov Integration

2019-09-04 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Not yet. Will do soon :). J. On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 3:51 PM Driesprong, Fokko wrote: > Did you find any time to fix this Jarek? Would be great to get this up and > running again. > > Cheers, Fokko > > Op wo 28 aug. 2019 om 14:28 schreef Jarek Potiuk >: > > > Apologies - I broke it at some poi

Re: Codecov Integration

2019-09-04 Thread Driesprong, Fokko
Did you find any time to fix this Jarek? Would be great to get this up and running again. Cheers, Fokko Op wo 28 aug. 2019 om 14:28 schreef Jarek Potiuk : > Apologies - I broke it at some point of time when introducing new CI > approach. This one commit that Kaxil mentions was supposed to fix it

Apache Airflow 1.10.5 is released

2019-09-04 Thread Kaxil Naik
Dear Airflow community, I'm happy to announce that Airflow 1.10.5 was just released. The source release, as well as the binary "sdist" release, are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/airflow/1.10.5/ (Older releases are available from https://archive.apache.org/dist/airflo

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Airflow 1.10.5rc1 as 1.10.5

2019-09-04 Thread Kaxil Naik
Hello, Apache Airflow 1.10.5 (based on rc1) has been accepted. 3 “+1” binding votes received: - Kaxil Naik (binding) - Ash Berlin-Taylor (binding) - Fokko Driesprong (binding) No negative ("-1") votes received. Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/553edaeaf15770e01fc76c48a8aeff113

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Airflow 1.10.5rc1 as 1.10.5

2019-09-04 Thread Driesprong, Fokko
Thanks Kaxil for running the release. Tested this with Docker using Python3 to run some examples. +1 (binding) Cheers, Fokko Op ma 2 sep. 2019 om 13:03 schreef Ash Berlin-Taylor : > Tested this with Celery and Kubernetes executors on py3. > > +1 (binding) > > -ash > > > On 31 Aug 2019, at 01:20