Did you find any time to fix this Jarek? Would be great to get this up and
running again.

Cheers, Fokko

Op wo 28 aug. 2019 om 14:28 schreef Jarek Potiuk <[email protected]>:

> Apologies - I broke it at some point of time when introducing new CI
> approach. This one commit that Kaxil mentions was supposed to fix it :). I
> think it was broken afterwards or during rebase.
> The problem with codecov is that until you merge it to master you never
> know if it finally works or not (it reports difference vs. relative good
> "master" result"). It's a bit hit-or-miss.
>
> I will take a look and fix it shortly.
>
> J.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:52 AM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It seems to be not doing much as it is unable to find a dependency.
> >
> >   _____          _
> > 10217 / ____|        | |
> > 10218| |     ___   __| | ___  ___ _____   __
> > 10219| |    / _ \ / _` |/ _ \/ __/ _ \ \ / /
> > 10220| |___| (_) | (_| |  __/ (_| (_) \ V /
> > 10221 \_____\___/ \__,_|\___|\___\___/ \_/
> > 10222                              Bash-8a28df4
> > 10223
> > 10224
> > 10225==> Travis CI detected.
> > 10226    project root: .
> > 10227    Yaml not found, that's ok! Learn more at
> > http://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-yaml
> > 10228==> Running gcov in . (disable via -X gcov)
> > 10229==> Python coveragepy not found
> > 10230==> Searching for coverage reports in:
> > 10231    + .
> > 10232--> No coverage report found.
> > 10233    Please visit http://docs.codecov.io/docs/supported-languages
> > 10234+ in_container_script_end
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:51 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > The change seems to be that the CodeCov is now embedded inside tests
> and
> > > is run at last.
> > >
> > > Check this: https://travis-ci.org/apache/airflow/jobs/577789685#L10216
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:49 PM Kaxil Naik <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Looks like this commit:
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/commit/8b41c3f12944c9b87fd04bd7137ba03d7e5a502f#diff-2eeaed663bd0d25b7e608891384b7298
> > changed
> > >> it.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 12:39 PM Driesprong, Fokko
> <[email protected]
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I've noticed that the latest reports are at 2019-08-08:
> > >>> https://codecov.io/github/apache/airflow?branch=master
> > >>>
> > >>> But I don't see any commits that day that changed any significantly
> on
> > >>> that
> > >>> area:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/airflow/commits/master?after=f40b3b5dd766f271447fef282bb6681bff575814+139
> > >>>
> > >>> Op wo 28 aug. 2019 om 13:34 schreef Driesprong, Fokko
> > >>> <[email protected]
> > >>> >:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Hi Kaxil,
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I did notice that the coveralls library is gone, we had this before
> > to
> > >>> > push it to codecov. I know that the names are different, and it is
> > >>> > confusing, I tried to remove it before:
> > >>> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/3295
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Let us see if it works again when reenabling this library:
> > >>> > https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5936
> > >>> >
> > >>> > A lot has changed recently with all the tests, but it might be that
> > the
> > >>> > current CI pipeline doesn't contain this step anymore, but I lost a
> > >>> bit of
> > >>> > track recently.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Cheers, Fokko
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Op wo 28 aug. 2019 om 13:19 schreef Kaxil Naik <
> [email protected]
> > >:
> > >>> >
> > >>> >> Did we remove codecov.io integration from Airflow?
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Previously on each PR we used to get info if the Code Coverage
> would
> > >>> >> increase/decrease by what % if it is merged.
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> Regards,
> > >>> >> Kaxil
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Jarek Potiuk
> Polidea <https://www.polidea.com/> | Principal Software Engineer
>
> M: +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
> [image: Polidea] <https://www.polidea.com/>
>

Reply via email to