Excellent work! I really like it, esp. the documentation part. Thank you
everyone who contributed to it đź‘Ť
+1 for it is very subjective and I'm in favor of the moving elements. I'm
not so sure how being a project for serious user would conflict with just
showing some moving elements in the landing
Very nice work!
- Personally I quite like the moving background elements, and I do not find it
distracting. I believe this is very subjective, and we can discuss on each
other’s preference forever. So... But anyway, if there will be any vote, mine
is +1 for the current one.
- At Documentation
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 6:00 AM Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy
wrote:
> Thank you both for your feedback.
>
> I really dislike the moving background elements on the lading page. I
> > already found the previous example when they weren't moving hard to focus
> > on other elements such as finding the header
Thank you both for your feedback.
I really dislike the moving background elements on the lading page. I
> already found the previous example when they weren't moving hard to focus
> on other elements such as finding the header menu and going to the
> documentation, for me this is now easily twice
Looking good overall, and a huge improvement in what we currently have!
(Not sure how much of this is relevant at this stage)
- On mobile the integration boxes are rather oversized (see screen shot of it
attaches)
- Those link to readthedocs - but they should link to versioned docs hosted on
o
Hi Aizhamal,
I really dislike the moving background elements on the lading page. I already
found the previous example when they weren't moving hard to focus on other
elements such as finding the header menu and going to the documentation, for me
this is now easily twice as worse. If no one else
Hi everybody,
We are super close to the final version of the Airflow website and we
really need YOU to play with the prototype to make sure that everything is
working properly.
Here is the link: https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/
Please submit your feedback on the prototype in this
Let me then cancel this vote and I will restart it next week.
Yeah. It's a bit like re-opening the Pandora's box but now that we know
that we can do it, and we are unblocked in moving to google (which is now
the biggest move in-progress), we can spend more time on getting better
(and more final)
Yes, that makes sense.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 3:22 PM Kamil Breguła
wrote:
> In the case of Hadoop, it is published by Apache, so it can be in the
> apache directory. This will mimic the grouping presented in the
> documentation.
> https://airflow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/operators-and-hooks-re
In the case of Hadoop, it is published by Apache, so it can be in the
apache directory. This will mimic the grouping presented in the
documentation.
https://airflow.readthedocs.io/en/latest/operators-and-hooks-ref.html#software-operators-and-hooks
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 3:47 PM Kaxil Naik wrote
I think we should keep the vote open at least until mid next week to have
more thought and inputs on this one.
In general, I am happy with the approach but operators/hooks and sensors
shouldn't be a provider. "hadoop" can be its provider and hdfs can be a
part of it.
providers/
google
I really like to make everything a provider. That's a great idea ! This way
everything "backportable" will have to be in "providers" package. Really
nice and clean separation (and less mess in "airflow"). And we will not
have to have any artificial grouping (we can still group them at the
documenta
Do we need to include `-backport,`? What was the thinking behind that?
I think software and protocol should be merged. I would also say _everything_
is a provider, so airflow.providers.ssh.SSHOperator for instance is what I
would prefer
-a
On 8 November 2019 08:32:42 GMT, Jarek Potiuk wrote:
One more day to go. I would love to see some opinions on this AIP-21 update
:).
Executive summary:
* we will be moving a number of integrations to sub-packages of airflow.
* they will be backportable to 1.10.*. There will be
'apache-airflow-[package]-backport' pypi installable with python 3 that
14 matches
Mail list logo
