Very nice work!

- Personally I quite like the moving background elements, and I do not find it 
distracting. I believe this is very subjective, and we can discuss on each 
other’s preference forever. So... But anyway, if there will be any vote, mine 
is +1 for the current one.

- At Documentation page, when I choose version, the order is “Stable (1.10.6) 
-> 1.10.1-> 1.10.2 -> 1.10.3->…”. But personally I think “reverse” order is 
making more sense, i.e. “Stable (1.10.6) -> 1.10.5-> 1.10.4 -> 1.10.3->…”

- Some links are not working yet (maybe they will be handled later?), including:
        * “View Page Source” button at page 
https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/ 
<https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/>
        * PIP Installation “Quick Start” button at page 
https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/ 
<https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/> (it leads me to 
GitHub index page)


Again, very nice work! Thanks!



XD


> On 9 Nov 2019, at 8:29 AM, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <aizha...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Thank you both for your feedback.
> 
> I really dislike the moving background elements on the lading page. I
>> already found the previous example when they weren't moving hard to focus
>> on other elements such as finding the header menu and going to the
>> documentation, for me this is now easily twice as worse. If no one else
>> agrees with me I guess it's a personal quirk you can ignore as an outlier
> 
> 
> @Everyone, does majority of you don't like the floating squares on the
> landing page? Would you prefer it to be static and something more simple
> and clean? I would really appreciate if you can share some ideas of what
> could be a good replacement.
> 
> When clicking "Install" I get "Connect failed", is there a proposed UI for
>> this page or is this not part of the demo?
>> 
>> Yes, if you click the "install" on the top right, they both should lead
> the same page.
> 
> On the documentation page there is a submenu floating on the left side of
>> the screen which by default has the menus ["Apache Airflow Documentation ",
>> "Principles", "Beyond the Horizon", "Content"]. At my desktops default
>> resolution (1080p) with my default window size (half horizontal width) that
>> submenu is entirely squished and inaccessible.
>> 
> 
> Yes, I also found few places where text or manu gets squished, like when
> you search the docs.
> 
> - On mobile the integration boxes are rather oversized (see screen shot of
>> it attaches)
>> 
> 
> I think apache lists do not support the files, so we can't see any
> attachments.
> 
> 
>> - Those link to readthedocs - but they should link to versioned docs
>> hosted on our on site.
>> 
> Ack, will pass on this feedback.
> 
> - The version selection in the docs on our site isn't quite working right:
>> if I select 1.10.6 it still shows 2.0.0dev
>> 
> Ack, will pass on this feedback.
> 
> - blog posts still populated with placeholders?
>> 
> Correct, case studies page as well.
> 
> 
>> - after selecting roadmap from the top menu there is a subpage nav that
>> feels out of place
>> 
> The idea was to have a documentation page, that supports images/graphs,
> etc. And if we end up adding more to it in the future. It can be one page
> only as well.
> 
> - "learn more" from meetup page doesn't go anywhere useful
>> 
> Learn more will lead to the Meetup.com registration page.
> 
> 
>> - There are two section "collapsers" on the community page: a blue arrow
>> on the right and a black one on the left (again, see screenshot)
>> 
> Again, can't see the screenshots :(
> 
> 
>> - we should probably point most users towards users@ not dev@ mailing list
>> 
> Agree. Is user@ list currently active? I am just wondering if people are
> following that list, and user's questions are getting enough attention.
> 
> - "Primary Members Commiters" heading on Community page should probably say
>> "Project Management Committee"
> 
> +1
> 
> Hope this list was useful :)
>> 
> +100 :) Thank you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On 8 November 2019 20:08:41 GMT, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <
>> aizha...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi everybody,
>>> 
>>> We are super close to the final version of the Airflow website and we
>>> really need YOU to play with the prototype to make sure that everything is
>>> working properly.
>>> 
>>> Here is the link: https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/
>>> 
>>> Please submit your feedback on the prototype in this thread before Tuesday,
>>> 10.00am CEST. After that it will be Commit-then-Review process.
>>> 
>>> We also need YOUR help to create a website copy. Marta has created this
>>> document [1] where you can put the information, instructions or
>>> guidelines that need to appear in each section. It doesn't need to be
>>> perfect, just needs to convey the knowledge that you already have on how to
>>> install Airflow or how to submit a bug, for example. I will be adding
>>> things myself too.
>>> 
>>> Let's make sure that we have the necessary and relevant
>>> information available for our users and contributors before we publish it.
>>> Here is an article on how to write a web copy if anyone wants to take a
>>> look [2].
>>> 
>>> [1]
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y4jBjtQ13zeLZ2e3V4foa51pN-168p1DHJ5zc7cbyGg/edit?ts=5dbc78cd
>>> [2] https://expresswriters.com/how-to-write-web-copy/
>>> 
>>> 

Reply via email to