Excellent work! I really like it, esp. the documentation part. Thank you everyone who contributed to it đź‘Ť
+1 for it is very subjective and I'm in favor of the moving elements. I'm not so sure how being a project for serious user would conflict with just showing some moving elements in the landing page. Or I'm not even sure what does serious user mean. Cheers, Kevin Y On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 7:46 PM Deng Xiaodong <[email protected]> wrote: > Very nice work! > > - Personally I quite like the moving background elements, and I do not > find it distracting. I believe this is very subjective, and we can discuss > on each other’s preference forever. So... But anyway, if there will be any > vote, mine is +1 for the current one. > > - At Documentation page, when I choose version, the order is “Stable > (1.10.6) -> 1.10.1-> 1.10.2 -> 1.10.3->…”. But personally I think “reverse” > order is making more sense, i.e. “Stable (1.10.6) -> 1.10.5-> 1.10.4 -> > 1.10.3->…” > > - Some links are not working yet (maybe they will be handled later?), > including: > * “View Page Source” button at page > https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/ < > https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/docs/stable/> > * PIP Installation “Quick Start” button at page > https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/ < > https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/install/> (it leads me to > GitHub index page) > > > Again, very nice work! Thanks! > > > > XD > > > > On 9 Nov 2019, at 8:29 AM, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Thank you both for your feedback. > > > > I really dislike the moving background elements on the lading page. I > >> already found the previous example when they weren't moving hard to > focus > >> on other elements such as finding the header menu and going to the > >> documentation, for me this is now easily twice as worse. If no one else > >> agrees with me I guess it's a personal quirk you can ignore as an > outlier > > > > > > @Everyone, does majority of you don't like the floating squares on the > > landing page? Would you prefer it to be static and something more simple > > and clean? I would really appreciate if you can share some ideas of what > > could be a good replacement. > > > > When clicking "Install" I get "Connect failed", is there a proposed UI > for > >> this page or is this not part of the demo? > >> > >> Yes, if you click the "install" on the top right, they both should lead > > the same page. > > > > On the documentation page there is a submenu floating on the left side of > >> the screen which by default has the menus ["Apache Airflow > Documentation ", > >> "Principles", "Beyond the Horizon", "Content"]. At my desktops default > >> resolution (1080p) with my default window size (half horizontal width) > that > >> submenu is entirely squished and inaccessible. > >> > > > > Yes, I also found few places where text or manu gets squished, like when > > you search the docs. > > > > - On mobile the integration boxes are rather oversized (see screen shot > of > >> it attaches) > >> > > > > I think apache lists do not support the files, so we can't see any > > attachments. > > > > > >> - Those link to readthedocs - but they should link to versioned docs > >> hosted on our on site. > >> > > Ack, will pass on this feedback. > > > > - The version selection in the docs on our site isn't quite working > right: > >> if I select 1.10.6 it still shows 2.0.0dev > >> > > Ack, will pass on this feedback. > > > > - blog posts still populated with placeholders? > >> > > Correct, case studies page as well. > > > > > >> - after selecting roadmap from the top menu there is a subpage nav that > >> feels out of place > >> > > The idea was to have a documentation page, that supports images/graphs, > > etc. And if we end up adding more to it in the future. It can be one page > > only as well. > > > > - "learn more" from meetup page doesn't go anywhere useful > >> > > Learn more will lead to the Meetup.com registration page. > > > > > >> - There are two section "collapsers" on the community page: a blue arrow > >> on the right and a black one on the left (again, see screenshot) > >> > > Again, can't see the screenshots :( > > > > > >> - we should probably point most users towards users@ not dev@ mailing > list > >> > > Agree. Is user@ list currently active? I am just wondering if people are > > following that list, and user's questions are getting enough attention. > > > > - "Primary Members Commiters" heading on Community page should probably > say > >> "Project Management Committee" > > > > +1 > > > > Hope this list was useful :) > >> > > +100 :) Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 8 November 2019 20:08:41 GMT, Aizhamal Nurmamat kyzy < > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi everybody, > >>> > >>> We are super close to the final version of the Airflow website and we > >>> really need YOU to play with the prototype to make sure that > everything is > >>> working properly. > >>> > >>> Here is the link: https://airflow-website-s5z26d2t7a-ew.a.run.app/ > >>> > >>> Please submit your feedback on the prototype in this thread before > Tuesday, > >>> 10.00am CEST. After that it will be Commit-then-Review process. > >>> > >>> We also need YOUR help to create a website copy. Marta has created this > >>> document [1] where you can put the information, instructions or > >>> guidelines that need to appear in each section. It doesn't need to be > >>> perfect, just needs to convey the knowledge that you already have on > how to > >>> install Airflow or how to submit a bug, for example. I will be adding > >>> things myself too. > >>> > >>> Let's make sure that we have the necessary and relevant > >>> information available for our users and contributors before we publish > it. > >>> Here is an article on how to write a web copy if anyone wants to take a > >>> look [2]. > >>> > >>> [1] > >>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y4jBjtQ13zeLZ2e3V4foa51pN-168p1DHJ5zc7cbyGg/edit?ts=5dbc78cd > >>> [2] https://expresswriters.com/how-to-write-web-copy/ > >>> > >>> > >
