Re: [Discuss] AIP-23 Proposal "Migration out of Travis CI"

No problem on that side - Tomek is using the same scripts we have on Travis (and they generally work - I think the last step is to make all the tests pass. We have still a number of dependencies between tests and some environmental flakiness so that some tests consistently fail in Github Actions wh

Re: [Discuss] AIP-23 Proposal "Migration out of Travis CI"

+1 on my end as well. @jarek does this affect anything involving breeze? Do GitHub actions have an easy docker/docker-compose based workflow? via Newton Mail [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx&cv=10.0.32&pv=10.14.5&source=email_footer_2] On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:28 AM, Ash Berlin-Taylor

Fwd: 2020 ASF Community Survey

Hi everybody, If you haven't seen this yet, the ASF sent out a community survey around D&I. Could you please take a few minutes to fill it out? It will be very interesting to see the statistics around Airflow and changes in the community overtime:) Thank you all in advance. Aizhamal -- F

Re: [Discuss] AIP-23 Proposal "Migration out of Travis CI"

Legal: no I don't think so. Infra: possibly yes to get secrets in there to run things on our own "hardware" - https://help.github.com/en/actions/automating-your-workflow-with-github-actions/creating-and-using-encrypted-secrets

Re: Grouping tests using pytest markers

I am all-in for markers. I think we should start with small set of useful markers, which should have a useful purpose from the beginning and implement them first - to learn how useful they are (before we decide on full set of markers). Otherwise maintaining those markers will become a fruitless "c

Grouping tests using pytest markers

Hi everyone, Since we run our tests using pytest we are able to use test markers [1]. Using them will give use some useful things: - additional information of test type (ex. when used for system test) - easy way to select test by types (ex. pytest -v -m "not system") - way to split our test suite

Re: [Discuss] AIP-23 Proposal "Migration out of Travis CI"

+1 for Github Actions. I've noticed that Spark is also using this: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26644 Cheers, Fokko Op di 10 dec. 2019 om 11:45 schreef Kamil Breguła : > +1 for Github Actions > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:49 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > +1 for Github actions > > > > On M

Re: [Discuss] AIP-23 Proposal "Migration out of Travis CI"

+1 for Github Actions On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 11:49 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 for Github actions > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2019, 22:16 Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > > Happy with any thing that gives a more seamless CI experience - faster is > > good too! > > > > -a > > > > On 9 December 2019 22:12:05 GM

Re: [DISCUSS] Revenge of the asserts

I like this idea, and such assertion looks very promising. assert "maximum recursion" in str(excinfo.value) Have a nice day! On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 6:16 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > It's definitely worth a try! I even mentioned this in AIP-27. But I think > this script does not change SetUp /