Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Maxime Beauchemin
+1 how about +1000² to "let's make html email a default thing in all the lists" On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:14 PM Felix Uellendall wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 20:14, Kamil Breguła > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, 19:52 Tao Feng wrote: > > > >> +1 > >> > >>

Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Felix Uellendall
+1 On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 20:14, Kamil Breguła wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, 19:52 Tao Feng wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:05 Daniel Imberman >> wrote: >> >> > +1 (binding) >> > >> > via Newton Mail >> > >> > [ >> > >> https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=d

Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Kamil Breguła
+1 (binding) On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, 19:52 Tao Feng wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:05 Daniel Imberman > wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > via Newton Mail > > > > [ > > > https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx&cv=10.0.50&pv=10.15.6&source=email_footer_2 > > ] > > > > On Mon, Sep 14,

Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Tao Feng
+1 On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 09:05 Daniel Imberman wrote: > +1 (binding) > > via Newton Mail > > [ > https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx&cv=10.0.50&pv=10.15.6&source=email_footer_2 > ] > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:03 AM, Jarek Potiuk > > wrote: > > Oh noo .. I just started to use Pl

Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Daniel Imberman
+1 (binding) via Newton Mail [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=dx&cv=10.0.50&pv=10.15.6&source=email_footer_2] On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:03 AM, Jarek Potiuk wrote: Oh noo .. I just started to use Plain Text Mode in my Gmail more often than not. Seriously though: +1 Binding.

Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Oh noo .. I just started to use Plain Text Mode in my Gmail more often than not. Seriously though: +1 Binding. On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:21 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > +1 binding > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, 13:07 Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > > > A follow up reason: HTML emails are pro

Re: Consider using stale bot for issues

2020-09-14 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Ticket updated with both - Paola and Asif. :) The more, the merrier indeed :) J. On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 4:08 PM Paola Peraza Calderon wrote: > Jarek - my GitHub is @paolaperaza! Thanks for submitting that ticket with > INFRA - let me know if there's anything else you need from me on that > f

Re: Consider using stale bot for issues

2020-09-14 Thread Paola Peraza Calderon
Jarek - my GitHub is @paolaperaza! Thanks for submitting that ticket with INFRA - let me know if there's anything else you need from me on that front. On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 6:50 AM Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > The more the merrier! Don't you have enough on your plate maintaining > Celery though?

Re: [REMINDER] Airflow 2.0 Dev Call Today

2020-09-14 Thread Kaxil Naik
Will add it On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:51 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > If we have time I would like to add a small point about refreshing WebUI as > discussed on slack in #sig-ui. > > The main idea is to apply minimal color changes (probably using Airflow > braning color palette) to give the UI a

Re: [REMINDER] Airflow 2.0 Dev Call Today

2020-09-14 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
If we have time I would like to add a small point about refreshing WebUI as discussed on slack in #sig-ui. The main idea is to apply minimal color changes (probably using Airflow braning color palette) to give the UI a more modern look. Cheers, Tomek On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 2:29 PM Kaxil Naik w

Re: [REMINDER] Airflow 2.0 Dev Call Today

2020-09-14 Thread Kaxil Naik
:-D sounds like a plan ;) On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:27 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Next time just put '+1' version Kaxil ;). > > J. > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:13 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > (copy-paste error - It is our 4th call) > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:10 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: >

Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 binding On Mon, Sep 14, 2020, 13:07 Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > A follow up reason: HTML emails are probably more user friendly too, as > plain-text only is very much a throw back to past times and reminds me > of grouchy linux types (of which I used to be one) who also complain > about top p

Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
A follow up reason: HTML emails are probably more user friendly too, as plain-text only is very much a throw back to past times and reminds me of grouchy linux types (of which I used to be one) who also complain about top posting :D -ash On Sep 14 2020, at 12:42 pm, Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > H

Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
+1 from me. I think this cast new light on the possibility of using the Apache mailing list for newsletter :) Tomek On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:51 PM Deng Xiaodong wrote: > +1 from me definitely. It makes sharing pictures etc much easier. > > > XD > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 13:42 Ash Berlin-Tayl

Re: Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Deng Xiaodong
+1 from me definitely. It makes sharing pictures etc much easier. XD On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 13:42 Ash Berlin-Taylor wrote: > Hi all, > > > > As I'm sure you are aware, right now the dev@ list does not allow HTML > > emails. I'm finding this more annoying as time goes on. > > > > It turns out

Discuss: should we allow HTML emails on dev@ list

2020-09-14 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
Hi all, As I'm sure you are aware, right now the dev@ list does not allow HTML emails. I'm finding this more annoying as time goes on. It turns out this is a setting that we could ask the Apache Infra team to change for us. (For example https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-19311) This em

Re: [REMINDER] Airflow 2.0 Dev Call Today

2020-09-14 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Next time just put '+1' version Kaxil ;). J. On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:13 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > (copy-paste error - It is our 4th call) > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:10 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to remind everyone that we will have our third developer > > call

Re: [VOTE] AIP-8 Split Providers into Separate Packages for Airflow 2.0

2020-09-14 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Thanks Ash. Some good points Indeed. I am more and more convinced to SEMVER. I do agree that consistently following SEMVER has some really nice properties and makes user decisions easier. CALVER kind of passes the problem to the users rather than solve it by the maintainers. But the problem remain

Re: [REMINDER] Airflow 2.0 Dev Call Today

2020-09-14 Thread Kaxil Naik
(copy-paste error - It is our 4th call) On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:10 PM Kaxil Naik wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to remind everyone that we will have our third developer > call today: > > *Airflow 2.0 Dev Call Calendar Link*: > https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=c_dhdh3bdjc42c4n

[REMINDER] Airflow 2.0 Dev Call Today

2020-09-14 Thread Kaxil Naik
Hi all, I would like to remind everyone that we will have our third developer call today: *Airflow 2.0 Dev Call Calendar Link*: https://calendar.google.com/calendar/embed?src=c_dhdh3bdjc42c4ngtnpg7ovcs9g%40group.calendar.google.com&ctz=Europe%2FLondon *Time*: 5:30-6:30 PM GMT *Zoom Link*: https:/

Re: Consider using stale bot for issues

2020-09-14 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
The more the merrier! Don't you have enough on your plate maintaining Celery though? ;) -ash On Sep 14 2020, at 11:19 am, Asif Saif Uddin wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm Asif (https://github.com/auvipy), I am a python developer with a > significant amount o time maintaining small and big open source

Re: [VOTE] AIP-8 Split Providers into Separate Packages for Airflow 2.0

2020-09-14 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
On Sep 14 2020, at 11:01 am, Jarek Potiuk wrote: >> >> >> > We have to make sure that we have no dependencies core -> providers >> >> How do we handle writing logs to S3/GCS/Azure Blob storage, which >> depends on the hook from the provider to work? >> > > Good point. I will make sure tha

Re: Consider using stale bot for issues

2020-09-14 Thread Asif Saif Uddin
Hi All, I'm Asif (https://github.com/auvipy), I am a python developer with a significant amount o time maintaining small and big open source projects. I would love to help triage & review issues & pull request for apache airflow. Thanks On 2020/09/10 11:56:22, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > Hi a

Re: [VOTE] AIP-8 Split Providers into Separate Packages for Airflow 2.0

2020-09-14 Thread Jarek Potiuk
I added the point about logging to the AIP. I'd love to hear more thoughts on how the SEMVER process might work for those numerous packages - Ash I'd love to understand what scheme you think is the best. One more comment for my options - I really like the point that Vikram made about the "lack" o

Re: [VOTE] AIP-8 Split Providers into Separate Packages for Airflow 2.0

2020-09-14 Thread Jarek Potiuk
> > > > We have to make sure that we have no dependencies core -> providers > > How do we handle writing logs to S3/GCS/Azure Blob storage, which > depends on the hook from the provider to work? > Good point. I will make sure that I address it in the PR as well. I think those should only work when

Re: [VOTE] AIP-8 Split Providers into Separate Packages for Airflow 2.0

2020-09-14 Thread Ash Berlin-Taylor
Two unanswered questions from me I'd like to see resolved first. In the AIP you say: > We have to make sure that we have no dependencies core -> providers How do we handle writing logs to S3/GCS/Azure Blob storage, which depends on the hook from the provider to work? > Versioning proposal is C