+1 (non-binding)
Regards,
Rahul Vats
9953794332
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 06:05, Wei Lee wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Oct 31, 2023, at 2:16 AM, Hussein Awala wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding): Checked licences, signatures, checksums, source codes, and
> > ran some testing dags. A
Hi Briana,
Thank you for putting this together. It's looking pretty good for the first
draft.
I have added quite a few comments and left some suggestions for changes. A few
important things to call out here:
1. We should work backwards from what our goals are with this survey and how we
want
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Wei
> On Oct 31, 2023, at 2:16 AM, Hussein Awala wrote:
>
> +1 (binding): Checked licences, signatures, checksums, source codes, and
> ran some testing dags. All looks good.
>
>
> On Sat 28 Oct 2023 at 19:55, Elad Kalif wrote:
>
>> Hey all,
>>
>> I have just cut the
Hello everyone,
As discussed in
https://lists.apache.org/thread/x4gt2h5hql7j04jj0v7v7kzzv1nkrzxy this
email clls for lazy consensus on removal of the Qubole provider.
In short - we want to remove the Qubole provider as the company has been
acquired and the service and clients used to communicat
Thanks everyone.
I proposed a PR that completes the lifecycle description of providers :
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/35277 - once there are some comments
and initial approvals/consensus, I will start a separate `[VOTE]` thread on
it. In the meantime I will start `[LAZY CONSENSUS]` on re
+1 (binding): Checked licences, signatures, checksums, source codes, and
ran some testing dags. All looks good.
On Sat 28 Oct 2023 at 19:55, Elad Kalif wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is
> calling a vote on the release,
> which will last
Mixed up my J's! Thank you for catching Jarek :)
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 10:30 AM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> It was Jed's comment, but yes. I agree with it too :)
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 5:51 PM Briana Okyere
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you Jarek, this is very helpful.
> >
> > With your input in mind,
It was Jed's comment, but yes. I agree with it too :)
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 5:51 PM Briana Okyere
wrote:
> Thank you Jarek, this is very helpful.
>
> With your input in mind, let's move forward with a more flexible structure.
> If there is no clear Top PR, we can feature multiple. If there is,
Hey All,
It’s once again time to vote for the PR of the Month.
Please note that if there is no clear 'winner', we can include multiple PRs
in the newsletter per our recent vote: <
https://lists.apache.org/thread/hro5vkq87q6scscr1yh0s4onk6sgt63z>
With the help of the `get_important_pr_candidates`
Hey All,
Adding more than 1 PR of the Month to the Airflow Newsletter is accepted,
but only if there is no clear winner.
5 "+1" votes received:
- Pierre Jeambrun
- Amogh Desai
- Jarek Potiuk
- Aritra Basu
- Jed Cunningham
Vote thread: <
https://lists.apache.org/thread/7gyhbs4q5z1zfp4y2ttcx7z1tgw
Thank you Jarek, this is very helpful.
With your input in mind, let's move forward with a more flexible structure.
If there is no clear Top PR, we can feature multiple. If there is, we can
just include 1.
Also, moving forward, committers and community members alike can bump
specific PR's as we re
> Please let me know how I can help.
Pick a card 😊 In my original post I liked a project board where I think I
broke down all for the remaining tasks for Traces. Start at the top with the
onboarding one, then there is one labeled "must do first" which is to move
Howard's POC code (linked i
+1 (non binding). All AWS system tests are working fine against
apache-airflow-providers-amazon==8.10.0rc1. You can see the results here:
https://aws-mwaa.github.io/#/open-source/system-tests/version/ba4b55a1941d886b752025d3fc89bf1e7902b262_8.10.0rc1.html
On 2023/10/28 20:27:37 Jarek Potiuk wrot
+1 (binding) for Pinecone, Cohere
+0 (binding) for OpenAI. I share some of Hussein's concerns here. Or at
least put a ceiling on the Python client of 1.0.0 and release v1.0.0 of the
provider. Granted the provider can have successive major releases to handle
the 1.0.0 rewrite, but the latest I see
Seems reasonable to me!
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 7:28 AM Wei Lee wrote:
> +1
>
> Best,
> Wei
>
> > On Oct 30, 2023, at 5:36 AM, Utkarsh Sharma <
> utkarsh.sha...@astronomer.io.INVALID> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for the implementing the process, have little clue about the
> provider. :)
> >
> > Thanks,
>
+1
Best,
Wei
> On Oct 30, 2023, at 5:36 AM, Utkarsh Sharma
> wrote:
>
> +1 for the implementing the process, have little clue about the provider. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Utkarsh Sharma
>
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 10:59 PM Pierre Jeambrun
> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Le ven. 27 oct. 2023 à 19:16, Ari
Kind request: please use dedicated channels for this kind of questions
(users list, slack, Github Discussions):
https://airflow.apache.org/community/ links ("ask a question", "start a
discussion", "user list" ). Devlist is mostly for development related
discussions.
J,
On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 12:
Hi!
We're trying to install Apache Airflow v2.6.3 on a Kubernetes cluster of ours.
As a part of the installation, we have webserver, scheduler, worker and redis
pods deployed and using a pre-existing postgres DB that is present on a
different server. We've got all the pods up and running and cr
18 matches
Mail list logo
