Re: "Breeze" dev environment

2019-09-04 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey Elena, All, Since we have solved some teething problems with Breeze I agreed with Elena that we clearly separate out the two environments we have for Airflow - Local Virtualenv and Breeze. I prepared a doc-only PR https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6001 where advantages/disadvantages of us

Re: "Breeze" dev environment

2019-09-02 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey Kevin, Thanks for those - really helpful explanations! Sorry for spamming everyone but I post answers here as maybe some people might find it useful for their own usage of Breeze. I am also adding Elena - who is the technical writer who started to work on onboarding documentation so that she c

Re: "Breeze" dev environment

2019-08-29 Thread Kevin Yang
Oh sry somehow I missed a detail there, it was the virtualenv use case where I need to do the pip install. The docker approach went smoothily. I recall two test cases where I need to install packages, one is from the gcp operator tests and the other is a celery executor test( sry I can't remember t

Re: "Breeze" dev environment

2019-08-29 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Fantastic. Thanks. Do you recall which tests/packages they were? I'd love to see whats's the root cause. We are using the same image in CI and the tests pass, so I wonder what could be the reason for that. On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:13 AM Kevin Yang wrote: > Was looking forward to this since last

Re: "Breeze" dev environment

2019-08-29 Thread Kevin Yang
Was looking forward to this since last meet up in bay area. Tried both the docker solution and the virtualenv IDE( PyCharm) solution today and it was great. Great job Jarek and thank you so much. (One minor thing that may just be problem on my side: some tests complain about missing package so I d

Re: "Breeze" dev environment

2019-08-28 Thread Felix Uellendall
Great job Jarek! Thanks. I am looking forward to try it out as soon as I am back from holiday :) Felix Sent from ProtonMail mobile Original Message On Aug 28, 2019, 10:34, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Just FYI. We had some "teething" problems (of course) at the workshop but > fixes

Re: "Breeze" dev environment

2019-08-28 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Just FYI. We had some "teething" problems (of course) at the workshop but fixes to it are already merged to master (thanks Kaxil for the review)! J. On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 2:17 AM Chao-Han Tsai wrote: > Thanks Jarek for the hard work. It really improved the airflow development > experience a l

Re: "Breeze" dev environment

2019-08-27 Thread Chao-Han Tsai
Thanks Jarek for the hard work. It really improved the airflow development experience a lot. I remember the struggling I experienced to reproduce CI bug locally and I am glad that those days are now gone. This really lowered the barrier to contribute to Airflow and I look forward to more people joi

Re: "Breeze" dev environment

2019-08-27 Thread Sergio Kef
Amazing! congrats and thank you. On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 22:25, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello everyone, > > After a long time in the making I merged "Breeze" environment which is a > swiss-knife of everything testing in Airflow. It should make it even easier > to contribute to Airflow (easier to t

"Breeze" dev environment

2019-08-27 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hello everyone, After a long time in the making I merged "Breeze" environment which is a swiss-knife of everything testing in Airflow. It should make it even easier to contribute to Airflow (easier to test your changes locally while development in general). There is a fairly comprehensive documen