Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Improvements for Airflow 2.0

2020-10-23 Thread Kaxil Naik
Thanks all, I am going to go through all the feedback and get something actionable soon. On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:54 PM Leah Cole wrote: > Hey! Sorry I'm so late to this party. My email management in 2020 is not > quite what I want it to be. If you're still looking for opinions I know I > have

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Improvements for Airflow 2.0

2020-10-23 Thread Leah Cole
Hey! Sorry I'm so late to this party. My email management in 2020 is not quite what I want it to be. If you're still looking for opinions I know I have some about operator documentation, and if they're not relevant now, I'm sending them in case they're useful in the future! I'm looking at the docum

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Improvements for Airflow 2.0

2020-10-04 Thread Fabien BEURET
Hi, Definitely some examples on how to use operators in context would be helpful It's sometimes kind of hard to figure out how to use them So, just examples... (not to copy/paste, but to get inspired) Thx, Fabien On 2020/09/18 12:44:03, Kaxil Naik wrote: > Hi all, > > One of the thing that w

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Improvements for Airflow 2.0

2020-09-28 Thread Patrick Cando
Hi all, Airflow newbie here! Here were some ideas I had: I saw that the FAQs were at the bottom of the page and the project resources at the top. Perhaps this could be inverted with the FAQs being moved closer to the top and project resources move toward the bottom? My assumption here is the

[DISCUSS] Documentation Improvements for Airflow 2.0

2020-09-24 Thread Parth Pandey
Hi all, I am an engineer, and currently we are exploring airflow for better deployment of our legacy pipelines. So my main suggestion for the documentation is all the methods ,whether in-built or contributed , should have small examples attached alongside their explanation.This would enrich the

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Improvements for Airflow 2.0

2020-09-23 Thread Kaxil Naik
Bumping this thread again to get more responses. On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 5:13 PM Tomasz Urbaszek wrote: > Hi all, > > From my perspective the following sections could be better: > - how to on cross DAG dependencies, best practises, watchouts etc (I > should be able to contribute something over n

Re: [DISCUSS] Documentation Improvements for Airflow 2.0

2020-09-19 Thread Tomasz Urbaszek
Hi all, >From my perspective the following sections could be better: - how to on cross DAG dependencies, best practises, watchouts etc (I should be able to contribute something over next weekend) - configuration settings - it would be lovely to have not only technical description of a setting but

[DISCUSS] Documentation Improvements for Airflow 2.0

2020-09-18 Thread Kaxil Naik
Hi all, One of the thing that we skipped in last Airflow 2.0 dev was around "documentation". The main reason for skipping it in the meeting was to gather good data-points and feedbacks from the community. So my question to everyone reading this email is "What improvements do you want in the docs