Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-08 Thread Pavankumar Gopidesu
e. It's important to focus on building what users are > asking for. > > > From: Shahar Epstein > Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2024 10:58:27 AM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow &

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-08 Thread Hussein Awala
tant to focus on building what users are > asking for. > > > From: Shahar Epstein > Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2024 10:58:27 AM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow > Components >

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-08 Thread Oliveira, Niko
om: Shahar Epstein Sent: Wednesday, August 7, 2024 10:58:27 AM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: RE: [EXT] [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-07 Thread Shahar Epstein
+1 (binding) Looking forward! On 2024/08/01 20:13:00 Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello here, > > I reviewed and - I hope - addressed all the comments so far. One most > recent change in the doc was to allow a connection/variable to belong to > multiple teams. Also I mentioned a potential future change

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-04 Thread Jorrick Sleijster
; > dependencies, as you mentioned in the email. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking forward. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Kaxil > &

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-04 Thread Guangyang Li
nding. > > > > > > > > Many thougths and discussions went into this AIP. Also User survery > > showed > > > > a strong demand for this - same we have also in our house. A multi > team > > > > setup is eagerly needed. > > > > Nevert

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-02 Thread Vikram Koka
gt; > setup is eagerly needed. > > > Nevertheless the complexity and missing turn-key delivery will be a > > > challenge. I assume it needs to evolve. > > > Besides a bit sceptic words the possibilities rule-out the additional > > > complexity. I think

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-02 Thread Vincent Beck
- especially not with > > options to have some more breaking changes in AF3 is the right point to > > plan all meede structural changes in! Thanks Jarek for driving this! > > > > Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> > > <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-02 Thread Bishundeo, Rajeshwar
t;mailto:ja...@potiuk.com>>> > Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 10:40:16 PM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org <mailto:dev@airflow.apache.org> > <mailto:dev@airflow.apache.org <mailto:dev@airflow.apache.org>> > mailto:dev@airflow.apache.org> > <mailto:dev@airflo

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-02 Thread Mehta, Shubham
che.org <mailto:dev@airflow.apache.org> > mailto:dev@airflow.apache.org>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components > > Voting ends a week from now - i.e Thursday 8th of August 2023 (midnight). > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 10:13 PM Jarek Poti

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-02 Thread Kaxil Naik
anks Jarek for driving this! > > Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> > > From: Jarek Potiuk > Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 10:40:16 PM > To: dev@airflow.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airfl

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-02 Thread Scheffler Jens (XC-AS/EAE-ADA-T)
for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> From: Jarek Potiuk Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 10:40:16 PM To: dev@airflow.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components Voting ends a week from now - i.e Thursday 8th of August 2023 (mi

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-02 Thread Buğra Öztürk
+1 non-binding I’m looking forward to seeing this AIP as it will pave the way for follow-up features that enable fully manageable multi-tenancy. I’m also excited about the opportunity to work on this. 🙌 On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 10:40 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Voting ends a week from now - i.e Thurs

Re: [VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-01 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Voting ends a week from now - i.e Thursday 8th of August 2023 (midnight). On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 10:13 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > Hello here, > > I reviewed and - I hope - addressed all the comments so far. One most > recent change in the doc was to allow a connection/variable to belong to > multi

[VOTE] AIP-67 - Multi-team deplyment of Airflow Components

2024-08-01 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hello here, I reviewed and - I hope - addressed all the comments so far. One most recent change in the doc was to allow a connection/variable to belong to multiple teams. Also I mentioned a potential future change that will allow us to run "per-team" schedulers - leaving the UI/DB schema as the ma