Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-03-07 Thread Deng Xiaodong
Thanks everyone for the efforts to make this release happen! +1 (binding) from me. XD On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:05 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > I'd really appreciate one more +1 here from a PMC. No matter what the > future holds for the provider's release. The vast majority of the providers > hav

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-03-07 Thread Jarek Potiuk
I'd really appreciate one more +1 here from a PMC. No matter what the future holds for the provider's release. The vast majority of the providers have been tested by the users : https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14511. And we are one PMC vote away from simply pushing the button and releasing

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-03-04 Thread Kaxil Naik
Daniel, The problem is whenever we do batch — every month from now on — let’s say all providers work but just one of them failed in rc’s — if we cancel the entire vote again and start from scratch — it means +3 days. And since getting to the result of providers already takes a good amount of time

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-03-04 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey Daniel, The proposal is not new. We followed the very same proposal several times already for a number of batches of providers (I think 5 or 6 times already), I honestly do not feel there is anything "new" about it. I just tried to be helpful and explain what was there already because I thin

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-03-03 Thread Daniel Imberman
Hi Jarek, I think all of this sounds fine, but I think that we should start a new vote with this understanding. I wouldn't feel comfortable assuming that any of the previous +1's are still applicable as we have changed what people are +1’ing. At the minimum I think we could have people re-affirm

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-03-03 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hello Everyone, We need one more PMC member vote in order to be able to release the packages. Just to describe what the current status of the batch is: Based on discussion here: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14511 - I am planning to follow the process we had previously documented in o

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-03-02 Thread Kaxil Naik
+1 (binding). Verified Signature and SHA12. Based on the changes (and Changelog) I can verify that the following providers should work fine: - spark - kubernetes - jenkins - microsoft.azure - mysql - telegram - and all the ones that just have doc changes Regards, Kaxil O

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-03-02 Thread Ryan Hatter
There were some changes to the operator after my PR was merged: https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/master/airflow/providers/google/cloud/transfers/gdrive_to_gcs.py Pak Andrey (Scuall1992 on GitHub) might be able to confirm the operator is functional. > On Mar 2, 2021, at 13:16, Jarek Potiu

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-03-02 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hello everyone - just a reminder that we have voting (hopefully) finishing tomorrow. I'd love to get some votes for that. Just to clarify what the PMC votes mean, because I believe there were some question raised about the release process which we are going to discuss it tomorrow at the dev call

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-03-02 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey Ryan, There is no **must** in re-testing it. Providing that you tested it before with real GSuite account is for me enough of a confirmation ;). J. On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 10:00 PM Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer < arj.pyt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Salutes for having a GSuite account just for the fun

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-02-28 Thread Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer
Salutes for having a GSuite account just for the functionality 👍👍👍 On Mon, 1 Mar 2021, 00:05 Ryan Hatter, wrote: > I canceled my GSuite account when my PR for the gdrive to gcs operator was > approved & merged. Could anyone maybe help me ensure correct functionality? > > > On Feb 27, 2021, at 08

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-02-28 Thread Ryan Hatter
I canceled my GSuite account when my PR for the gdrive to gcs operator was approved & merged. Could anyone maybe help me ensure correct functionality? > On Feb 27, 2021, at 08:48, Jarek Potiuk wrote: > >  > I created issue, where we will track the status of tests for the providers > (again -

Re: [VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-02-27 Thread Jarek Potiuk
I created issue, where we will track the status of tests for the providers (again - it is experiment - but I'd really love to get feedback on the new providers from those who contributed): https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14511 On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 4:28 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote: > > Hey

[VOTE] Airflow Providers - release candidates from 2021-02-27

2021-02-27 Thread Jarek Potiuk
Hey all, I have just cut the new wave Airflow Providers packages. This email is calling a vote on the release, which will last for 72 hours + day for the weekend - which means that it will end on Wed 3 Mar 15:59:34 CET 2021. Consider this my (binding) +1. *KIND REQUEST* There was a recent disc