I hope it's only temporary measure - we are likely to release 1.10.11 in a
few weeks and then we can even delete those images. But I do agree that
adding test in the name might be a better looking one. Ash - WDYT?
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 12:25 PM Zikun Zhu wrote:
> When I looked at the tag
When I looked at the tag "apache/airflow:1.10.10.1-alpha1-python3.6" for
the first time, I thought "1.10.10.1-alpha1" refers to the Airflow version,
so I asked in Slack if this version includes a fix. I believe many (if not
most) users do not read IMAGES.rst in detail before using the images. It
When I looked at the tag "apache/airflow:1.10.10.1-alpha1-python3.6" for
the first time, I thought "1.10.10.1-alpha1" refers to the Airflow version.
I believe many (if not most) users do not read IMAGES.rst in detail before
using the images. It could be better to distinguish the syntax from
I think it's more for the community to decide. The ASF has some general
rules that we follow, yet there is usually a lot of room for community to
decide.
If we think we're good.with the rules, I believe we're good :)
J.
niedz., 7 cze 2020, 22:51 użytkownik Bas Harenslak
napisał:
> I could
I could give my own opinion about this thing, but is there nobody at Apache
that can answer this question?
Bas
> On 7 Jun 2020, at 20:09, Philippe Gagnon wrote:
>
> Hello Jarek,
>
> Since they are clearly marked as alpha releases I think this is okay. Just
> my opinion though.
>
> Regards,
Hello Jarek,
Since they are clearly marked as alpha releases I think this is okay. Just
my opinion though.
Regards,
Philippe
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:09 PM Jarek Potiuk
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> We have a question with Ash whether the way we are distributing alpha
> releases of our Docker
Hello everyone,
We have a question with Ash whether the way we are distributing alpha
releases of our Docker images is ok for everyone. This is mainly to the
other PMCs in the project but anyone's opinion is welcome.
*Context:*
We have been iterating with the production image over the last few
