[VOTE] Apache Ambari RC0

BARI/versions/12343641 Vote will be open for 72 hours. [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Oliver Szabo Apache Ambari 2.7.1 Release Manager

Ambari 2.7.1 release management

Hi all! I would like to volunteer to be the Release Manger for the upcoming Ambari 2.7.1 release. (apache email: oleew...@apache.org) Will keep everyone posted Regards, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 44188: Provide details on the JCE policy installed in the JVM used by Ambari

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44188/#review122069 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On March 4, 2016, 10:17

Re: Review Request 44328: Config version remains is_current=true even after it's group is deleted

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44328/#review121843 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On March 3, 2016, 1:22 p.m

Re: Review Request 42687: AMBARI-14690: Configurable system resources for ambari agents

ython/ambari_agent/Facter.py 85650b9 ambari-agent/src/test/python/ambari_agent/TestHardware.py 9ab02dc Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42687/diff/ Testing --- mvn -pl ambari-agent clean test Ran 424 tests in 10.708s OK Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 44267: Updates for initial logsearch stack definition

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44267/diff/ Testing --- Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 44206: NPE thrown when secure cluster is created with Blueprint that includes ACCUMULO

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44206/#review121636 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On March 2, 2016, 1:53 p.m

Re: Review Request 44206: NPE thrown when secure cluster is created with Blueprint that includes ACCUMULO

/internal/Stack.java (line 692) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/44206/#comment183380> Just a typo, I guess it should be 'with' instead of 'we'. - Oliver Szabo On March 2, 2016, 12:12 p.m., Sebastian Toader wrote: > >

Re: Review Request 44203: Ambari overrides trustore when executing "ambari-server setup-ldap"

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/44203/#review121432 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On March 1, 2016, 12:26

Re: Review Request 42687: AMBARI-14690: Configurable system resources for ambari agents

9ab02dc Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42687/diff/ Testing --- mvn -pl ambari-agent clean test Ran 424 tests in 10.708s OK Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42687: AMBARI-14690: Configurable system resources for ambari agents

/TestHardware.py 9ab02dc Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42687/diff/ Testing (updated) --- mvn -pl ambari-agent clean test Ran 424 tests in 10.708s OK Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 43832: AMBARI-14627: Ability to automate setup-security and setup-ldap/sync-ldap

Setup.py 643aebd ambari-server/src/main/python/ambari_server/setupHttps.py 4e95999 ambari-server/src/main/python/ambari_server/setupSecurity.py 36f6fa9 ambari-server/src/test/python/TestAmbariServer.py c47cc67 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43832/diff/ Testing --- Total run:902 Total errors:0 Total failures:0 OK FT: manually tested on branch-2.2, on trunk its in progress Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 43609: Return privilege information with results from GroupResourceProvider

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43609/#review119480 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On Feb. 17, 2016, 1:58 p.m

Re: Review Request 43537: KerberosDescriptorTest failed due to moved/missing test directory

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43537/#review119317 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On Feb. 12, 2016, 7:38 p.m

Re: Review Request 38095: Ambari UI shows "Corrupted Blocks" but it is "Corrupted replica"

38095/diff/ Testing (updated) --- Unit testing done. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 38095: Ambari UI shows "Corrupted Blocks" but it is "Corrupted replica"

sages.js 08ff073 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38095/diff/ Testing (updated) --- Testing is in progress ... Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 43532: AMBARI-15031 - Duplicate key violation during ldap sync

--- Testing is in progress ... Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 43482: Ldap Sync: Concurrent modification exception

term, sync should be rewritten, especially "refreshGroupMembers" method, we should try to avoid using recursion like that - Oliver ------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43482

Review Request 43482: Ldap Sync: Concurrent modification exception

ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/security/ldap/AmbariLdapDataPopulatorTest.java be92871 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/43482/diff/ Testing --- Unit testiong is in progress Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42572: Ambari server throws error when unused configs are present in blueprint

ss. FT: blueprints with unused config types. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42572: Ambari server throws error when unused configs are present in blueprint

ss. FT: blueprints with unused config types. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42796: AMBARI-14798: Users cannot login with uppercase username

Finished at: Tue Jan 26 13:17:14 CET 2016 [INFO] Final Memory: 85M/763M [INFO] ---- Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 42796: AMBARI-14798: Users cannot login with uppercase username

BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 1:07:55.903s (Wall Clock) [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jan 26 13:17:14 CET 2016 [INFO] Final Memory: 85M/763M [INFO] ---- Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42743: disabling kerberos does not remove auth to local rules

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42743/#review116335 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On Jan. 26, 2016, 12:56

Re: Review Request 42687: AMBARI-14690: Configurable system resources for ambari agents

/diff/ Testing --- Manually tested. No any unit tests for Facter.py (it can be added later based on how urgent is this patch) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 42687: AMBARI-14690: Configurable system resources for ambari agents

based on how urgent is this patch) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42572: Ambari server throws error when unused configs are present in blueprint

is in progress. FT: blueprints with unused config types. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42572: Ambari server throws error when unused configs are present in blueprint

ss. FT: blueprints with unused config types. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42572: Ambari server throws error when unused configs are present in blueprint

esting --- Unit testing is in progress. FT: blueprints with unused config types. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42572: Ambari server throws error when unused configs are present in blueprint

https://reviews.apache.org/r/42572/diff/ Testing --- Unit testing is in progress. FT: blueprints with unused config types. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42499: Exporting Blueprint doesn't have some configs

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42499/#review115624 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On Jan. 19, 2016, 2:33 p.m

Review Request 42572: Ambari server throws error when unused configs are present in blueprint

ss. FT: blueprints with unused config types. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 42558: Ldap: unnecessary logging during sync

ry Diffs - ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/security/ldap/AmbariLdapDataPopulator.java 3d2685e Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42558/diff/ Testing --- Manually tested Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42501: Blueprints: Stack advisor should consider user provided inputs on ''ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY" strategy

ts. - Oliver --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/42501/#review115179 --- On Jan. 19, 2016, 4:20 p.m., Oliver Szabo wrot

Re: Review Request 42501: Blueprints: Stack advisor should consider user provided inputs on ''ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY" strategy

NFO] Total time: 1:00:46.271s [INFO] Finished at: Tue Jan 19 16:55:58 CET 2016 [INFO] Final Memory: 39M/1277M [INFO] ---- Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 42501: Blueprints: Stack advisor should consider user provided inputs on ''ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY" strategy

rg/r/42501/diff/ Testing --- FT: provision with multiple blueprints (with user provided properties in the cluster-creation tempalte and in the blueprint too) Unit testing is in progress... Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42369: Kerberos automation logic should use stack advisor when determining configuration updates

/ClusterConfigurationRequestTest.java (line 46) <https://reviews.apache.org/r/42369/#comment175940> Just a small thing. Is using wildcard for imports allowed for ambari? if does not, fix it - Oliver Szabo On Jan. 18, 2016, 11:08 p.m., Robert Levas

Re: Review Request 42369: Kerberos automation logic should use stack advisor when determining configuration updates

> On Jan. 18, 2016, 4:21 p.m., Sandor Magyari wrote: > > ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/KerberosHelperImpl.java, > > line 421 > > > > > > As I understand there's no need to call stac

Re: Review Request 41925: AMBARI-14491: ZOOKEEPER_SERVER INSTALL failed

e HA) -> move namenode -> cluster info is correct (service check contains the correct nodes) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 42189: StackAdvisor: ConcurrentModificationException with blueprint provisioning

] Final Memory: 45M/1071M [INFO] Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 42189: StackAdvisor: ConcurrentModificationException with blueprint provisioning

] Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 41925: AMBARI-14491: ZOOKEEPER_SERVER INSTALL failed

tains the correct nodes) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 38487: Enable JPA statement caching (internal/external)

: 2015-09-17T17:21:55+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/605M [INFO] Functional testing: Locally: done on Postgres & MySQL databases Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 41925: AMBARI-14491: ZOOKEEPER_SERVER INSTALL failed

ect (service check contains the correct nodes) - basically the newly added unit tests cover most of the cases. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 41519: Spark thrift cannot start with umask 027

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41519/#review110990 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On Dec. 17, 2015, 5:48 p.m

Re: Review Request 41449: Spark server restart failed (java.lang.NumberFormatException) causing express upgrade to fail.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41449/#review110678 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On Dec. 16, 2015, 4:39 p.m

Review Request 41447: Cluster deployment with exported blueprint with stack advisor enabled doesn't work

patch testing is in progress. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 41220: In stack service scripts "commandParams/version" is misused

no thriftserver HDP 2.3.0 -> 2.3.2 no thriftserver HDP 2.3.2 -> 2.3.4 have thriftserver (this one is in progress) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 41220: In stack service scripts "commandParams/version" is misused

/downgrade: HDP 2.2 -> 2.3.0 no thriftserver HDP 2.2 -> 2.3.2 no thriftserver HDP 2.3.0 -> 2.3.2 no thriftserver HDP 2.3.2 -> 2.3.4 have thriftserver (this one is in progress) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 41220: In stack service scripts "commandParams/version" is misused

.2/package/scripts/params_linux.py c327c42 ambari-server/src/main/resources/common-services/SPARK/1.2.0.2.2/package/scripts/params.py 732f32c Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41220/diff/ Testing --- Python tests succeeded for ambari-server. Other Unit tests are in progress. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 41133: Hive Server 2 silently dies on Blueprint cluster

This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41133/#review109588 --- On Dec. 9, 2015, 2:19 p.m., Oliver Szabo wrote: > > ---

Re: Review Request 41213: Storm 'nimbus.seeds' property not handled correctly in Blueprint processor resulting Storm not being able to start.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41213/#review109827 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On Dec. 10, 2015, 6:48 p.m

Re: Review Request 41150: Storm configuration wrong

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41150/#review109734 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On Dec. 9, 2015, 9:33 p.m

Re: Review Request 41133: Hive Server 2 silently dies on Blueprint cluster

FO] Finished at: Wed Dec 09 14:11:16 CET 2015 [INFO] Final Memory: 38M/938M [INFO] -------- Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 41133: Hive Server 2 silently dies on Blueprint cluster

NFO] Final Memory: 38M/938M [INFO] -------- Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 41132: Ranger admin HA installation with Blueprints fail due to error in stack advisor

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41132/#review109498 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Oliver Szabo On Dec. 9, 2015, 10:50 a.m

Review Request 41009: UT failure on branch-2.2: BlueprintProcessorConfigurationTest

nProcessor.java 02905f9 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41009/diff/ Testing --- Unit test succeeded. (for these ones, for me there are some knox python tests which are still failing locally, but those are not related with this) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 40916: Multiple Ranger KMS server cause exception with Blueprint provisioning

s/stack_advisor.py a33be1e ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BlueprintConfigurationProcessorTest.java 17c0157 ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.2/common/test_stack_advisor.py f5c0436 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40916/diff/ Testing --- Unit testing in progress.. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 40924: During Upgrade Topology Manager Causes Ambari To Be Unresponsive With Infinite Loop

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40924/#review108969 --- Ship it! - Oliver Szabo On Dec. 3, 2015, 9:03 p.m., Sebastian

Re: Review Request 40916: Multiple Ranger KMS server cause exception with Blueprint provisioning

rver/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/BlueprintConfigurationProcessorTest.java 17c0157 ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.2/common/test_stack_advisor.py f5c0436 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40916/diff/ Testing --- Unit testing in progress.. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 40916: Multiple Ranger KMS server cause exception with Blueprint provisioning

tionProcessorTest.java 17c0157 ambari-server/src/test/python/stacks/2.2/common/test_stack_advisor.py f5c0436 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40916/diff/ Testing --- Unit testing in progress.. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 40778: HDFS check fails after move NameNode (wrong cluster info)

not available during provisioning), move NN, then cluster info had the right hosts and try upscale hosts. Unit Testing is in progress... Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 40778: HDFS check fails after move NameNode (wrong cluster info)

tps://reviews.apache.org/r/40778/diff/ Testing --- FT: tried on HA cluster (with e.g. metrics service, where host mappings not available during provisioning), move NN, then cluster info had the right hosts. Unit Testing is in progress... Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 40775: Stack advisor: Recommendations not applied if cluster creation template not contains all of the hostgroups (blueprint provisioning)

erver/api/services/stackadvisor/StackAdvisorBlueprintProcessorTest.java 2baa505 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40775/diff/ Testing --- Unit testing is in progress.. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 40476: Ambari LDAP integration cannot handle LDAP directories with multiple entries for the same user

FO] Final Memory: 48M/734M [INFO] ---- Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 40019: LDAP - Group Membership not pulled in with FreeIPA/RHELIDM

rg/r/40019/diff/ Testing --- Unit tests done. Functional testing: - works as expected with different ldap providers - nested group case: groupA has a groupB member, groupB has 2 users. Group csv file only contains groupA, then groupA and groupB were processed and 2 memberships were created.

Re: Review Request 40019: LDAP - Group Membership not pulled in with FreeIPA/RHELIDM

ldap providers - nested group case: groupA has a groupB member, groupB has 2 users. Group csv file only contains groupA, then groupA and groupB were processed and 2 memberships were created. Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 40019: LDAP - Group Membership not pulled in with FreeIPA/RHELIDM

r/security/ldap/LdapGroupDto.java 132cbe5 ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/security/ldap/AmbariLdapDataPopulatorTest.java 3f4f7b5 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/40019/diff/ Testing --- In progress ... Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

NFO] Finished at: 2015-10-20T16:23:54+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/687M [INFO] ------- Functional tests: Manually (added "config_recommendation_strategy" field to the cluster creation template: tried 4 variations: field is missing, and set the field to NEVER_APPLY, ALWAYS_APPLY and ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 01:30 h [INFO] Finished at: 2015-10-20T16:23:54+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/687M [INFO] ------- Functional tests: Manually (added "config_recommendation_strategy" field to the cluster creation template: tried 4 variations: field is missing, and set the field to NEVER_APPLY, ALWAYS_APPLY and ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

NFO] Finished at: 2015-10-20T16:23:54+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/687M [INFO] ------- Functional tests: Manually (added "config_recommendation_strategy" field to the cluster creation template: tried 4 variations: field is missing, and set the field to NEVER_APPLY, ALWAYS_APPLY and ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

- [INFO] Total time: 01:30 h [INFO] Finished at: 2015-10-20T16:23:54+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/687M [INFO] ------- Functional tests: Manually (added "config_recommendation_strategy" field to the cluster creation template: tried 4 variations: field is missing, and set the field to NEVER_APPLY, ALWAYS_APPLY and ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

2015-10-20T16:23:54+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/687M [INFO] ------- Functional tests: Manually (added "config_recommendation_strategy" field to the cluster creation template: tried 4 variations: field is missing, and set the field to NEVER_APPLY, ALWAYS_APPLY and ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

shed at: 2015-10-20T16:23:54+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/687M [INFO] ------- Functional tests: Manually (added "config_recommendation_strategy" field to the cluster creation template: tried 4 variations: field is missing, and set the field to NEVER_APPLY, ALWAYS_APPLY and ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

. thanks - Oliver --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/39481/#review103776 --- On Oct. 26, 2015, 3:01 p.m., Oliver Szabo wrote:

Re: Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

[INFO] Total time: 01:30 h [INFO] Finished at: 2015-10-20T16:23:54+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/687M [INFO] ------- Functional tests: Manually (added "config_recommendation_strategy" field to the cluster creation template: tried 4 variations: field is missing, and set the field to NEVER_APPLY, ALWAYS_APPLY and ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

[INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 01:30 h [INFO] Finished at: 2015-10-20T16:23:54+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/687M [INFO] --- Functional tests: Manually (added "config_recommendation_strategy" field to the cluster creation template: tried 4 variations: field is missing, and set the field to NEVER_APPLY, ALWAYS_APPLY and ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

if > > (configRecommendationStrategy.equals(ConfigRecommendationStrategy.ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY)) In this way how I did its nullsafe (but yes, it looks strange) - Oliver --- This is an automatically generate

Review Request 39481: Basic StackAdvisor support for blueprint (configurations)

-- [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 01:30 h [INFO] Finished at: 2015-10-20T16:23:54+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/687M [INFO] --- Functional tests: Manually (added "config_recommendation_strategy" field to the cluster creation template: tried 4 variations: field is missing, and set the field to NEVER_APPLY, ALWAYS_APPLY and ONLY_STACK_DEFAULTS_APPLY) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 38673: Improve error checking for blueprint resource creation

[INFO] Final Memory: 48M/589M [INFO] Functional tessting: manually, POST blueprint resource without body Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 38673: Improve error checking for blueprint resource creation

time: 01:24 h [INFO] Finished at: 2015-09-23T16:47:06+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/589M [INFO] Functional tessting: manually, POST blueprint resource without body Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 38673: Improve error checking for blueprint resource creation

] Functional tessting: manually, POST blueprint resource without body Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 38487: Enable JPA statement caching (internal/external)

[INFO] Functional testing: Locally: done on Postgres & MySQL databases Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 38487: Enable JPA statement caching (internal/external)

----- On Sept. 18, 2015, 1:24 p.m., Oliver Szabo wrote: > > --- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/38487/ >

Re: Review Request 38487: Enable JPA statement caching (internal/external)

> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS > [INFO] > ---- > [INFO] Total time: 01:31 h > [INFO] Finished at: 2015-09-17T17:21:55+00:00 > [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/605M > [INFO] > > > Functional testing: > Locally: done on Postgres & MySQL databases > > > Thanks, > > Oliver Szabo > >

Review Request 38487: Enable JPA statement caching (internal/external)

] Functional testing: Locally: done on Postgres & MySQL databases Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 38433: Config changes w/ blueprint provisioning are not picked up

ob/2.1.1/ambari-functions#L128 ("-v" param, path to your ambari-server.jar), then type 'docker exec -it amb0 bash' to enter the container, there: ambari-server stop, replace your ambari-server.jar then restart ambari-server (in case of exitting the container after stop, type 'docker exec -it amb0 bash' again) Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Review Request 38433: Config changes w/ blueprint provisioning are not picked up

[INFO] Total time: 01:13 h [INFO] Finished at: 2015-09-16T02:31:05+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 47M/520M [INFO] Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 38095: Ambari UI shows "Corrupted Blocks" but it is "Corrupted replica"

03T01:06:58+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 50M/619M [INFO] -------- Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 38095: Ambari UI shows "Corrupted Blocks" but it is "Corrupted replica"

[INFO] Total time: 01:14 h [INFO] Finished at: 2015-09-03T01:06:58+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 50M/619M [INFO] -------- Thanks, Oliver Szabo

Re: Review Request 38095: Ambari UI shows "Corrupted Blocks" but it is "Corrupted replica"

er --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/38095/#review97670 ------- On Sept. 3, 2015, 9:42 a.m., Oliver Szabo wrote: > > -

Review Request 38095: Ambari UI shows "Corrupted Blocks" but it is "Corrupted replica"

Finished at: 2015-09-03T01:06:58+00:00 [INFO] Final Memory: 50M/619M [INFO] -------- Thanks, Oliver Szabo