Bug report for Ant [2006/10/29]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36733] - NPE in XMLJUnitResultFormatter.formatOutput under Java 1.4.2_08

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[VOTE] Release Apache .NET Antlib 1.0 final

Hi, I've created distribution files for the .NET Antlib and uploaded them to and propose to release them as 1.0 final. As described on the release plan for this Antlib I don't expect the betas to get enough people to test it and the Antlib needs

svn commit: r469068 - /ant/antlibs/dotnet/tags/10/version.properties

Author: bodewig Date: Sun Oct 29 21:03:35 2006 New Revision: 469068 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=469068 Log: fix version number Modified: ant/antlibs/dotnet/tags/10/version.properties Modified: ant/antlibs/dotnet/tags/10/version.properties URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc

svn commit: r469067 - in /ant/antlibs/dotnet/tags/10: ./ NOTICE README TODO build.xml changes.xml contributors.xml doap_DotnetAntlib.rdf docs/ src/ version.properties

Author: bodewig Date: Sun Oct 29 21:02:04 2006 New Revision: 469067 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=469067 Log: tag 1.0 Added: ant/antlibs/dotnet/tags/10/ (props changed) - copied from r468977, ant/antlibs/dotnet/trunk/ ant/antlibs/dotnet/tags/10/NOTICE - copi

[ANN] Apache AntUnit 1.0 Beta 2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Apache Ant Team has releases the second beta of Apache AntUnit. AntUnit is an Ant Library created to simplify testing of Ant tasks and types. This release fixes a few bugs found in the first beta and adds a new assertion that matches strings agai

Re: AbstractFileSet/ bug 40722

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > at this occasion we should add a Clone() method to DataType and to > ProjectComponent. In order to have a proper implementation of clone in any datatype we need to implement it there, true. DataTypes that don't want to or can

Re: next release steps

I'm +1 on this (as in I want to help out after a fairly long awol period) - let me know if you want me to do anything to lighten the load Antoine oh and rc label for this one sounds good too Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: echo task documentation error

Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi Steve, I think you are a committer too. Feel free to edit the documentation. Regards, Antoine Steve Cohen wrote: A very minor point: The ant manual states that the echo task's message attribute is required "unless data is included in a character section within

Re: next release steps

Hi, After the different discussions, I propose to build a distribution on Sunday, November 5th. The version returned by ant -version would be 1.7.0RC1 and the tag in Subversion ANT_170_RC1. After having built the distribution, I will upload it to my account on people.apache.org and start a release

Re: echo task documentation error

This appears to be false. I have by accident discovered that has the effect of inserting a totally blank line into the output. It doesn't Damn! That is exactly what I need! the maven ant-run plugin seems to ignore the ${line.separator} property in an echo Thanks for discovering this and +

Re: echo task documentation error

Hi Steve, I think you are a committer too. Feel free to edit the documentation. Regards, Antoine Steve Cohen wrote: > A very minor point: > > The ant manual states that the echo task's message attribute is > required "unless data is included in a character section within this > element." > > Th

svn commit: r469050 - in /ant/core/trunk: WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/Path.java

Author: antoine Date: Sun Oct 29 18:53:20 2006 New Revision: 469050 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=469050 Log: fix for fails with NPE when compiling with eclipse ecj 3.1.x Bugzilla 40839. root cause of the problem was in org.eclipse.jdt.core.JDTCompiler method addExtDirs. A FileS

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40839] - fails with NPE when compiling with eclipse ecj 3.1.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

echo task documentation error

A very minor point: The ant manual states that the echo task's message attribute is required "unless data is included in a character section within this element." This appears to be false. I have by accident discovered that has the effect of inserting a totally blank line into the output.

AbstractFileSet/ bug 40722 [was : next release steps ]

Hi, the best solution would be to revert my changes in AbstractFileSet#setupDirectoryScanner(FileScanner, Project), and change this in mergePatterns : PatternSet ps = new PatternSet(); ps.append(defaultPatterns, p); to ps = defaultPatterns.clone(); the fact that PatternSet#

Re: next release steps

Hi, I am pretty sure that Matt will rework my changes. AbstractFileset#mergePatterns is called from Sync#removeOrphans, so I could not remove it without changing sync. Regards, Antoine Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Do we w

Re: people.apache.org/dist is missing files

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > >> Sorry about that. I suppose we should update our web site and say >> that we have no available beta any more ? >> > > Hi, I found that I still had the tgz file with the complete 1.7.0Beta3 distro on my PC under /tmp. I am uploading it to people.apache.org no

svn commit: r468979 - in /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk: doap_AntUnit.rdf version.properties

Author: bodewig Date: Sun Oct 29 12:36:00 2006 New Revision: 468979 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=468979 Log: bump versions Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/doap_AntUnit.rdf ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/version.properties Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/doap_AntUnit.

Re: and web.xml

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4. You can then pull in a web.xml file via the webxml attribute, or > via a nested fileset. In either case we say "Although needxmlfile is > false, a web.xml file was included " ... and point to the file that > was added. Sounds goo

Re: next release steps

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we want to keep this method in AbstractFileSet : > public synchronized PatternSet mergePatterns(Project p) > Maybe there is something useful in it ? If it has been added after 1.6.5, we can savely remove it. Any code would

Re: FW: antunit branch for 1.6.x compatibility

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Vladimir Egorov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Which parts of AntUnit would you use? >> Only the assertions or the tasks and listeners as well? > > Currently we are only interested in asserts library. Which is pretty easy to ke

Re: people.apache.org/dist is missing files

On Sun, 29 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > no, I did a "build clean" yesterday when I was working on fixing > bugs, and also found intelligent to remove the ant-beta3.tgz which > was on my home dir on people.apache.org (thinking it would spare > disk space out there).

Re: people.apache.org/dist is missing files

Hello Stefan, no, I did a "build clean" yesterday when I was working on fixing bugs, and also found intelligent to remove the ant-beta3.tgz which was on my home dir on people.apache.org (thinking it would spare disk space out there). Sorry about that. I suppose we should update our web site and sa

svn commit: r468966 - /ant/core/trunk/lib/optional/ant-antunit-1.0Beta2.jar

Author: bodewig Date: Sun Oct 29 11:54:55 2006 New Revision: 468966 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=468966 Log: replace with "official" jar Added: ant/core/trunk/lib/optional/ant-antunit-1.0Beta2.jar (with props) Added: ant/core/trunk/lib/optional/ant-antunit-1.0Beta2.jar UR

svn commit: r468965 - /ant/core/trunk/lib/optional/ant-antunit-1.0Beta2.jar

Author: bodewig Date: Sun Oct 29 11:54:25 2006 New Revision: 468965 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=468965 Log: replace with "official" jar Removed: ant/core/trunk/lib/optional/ant-antunit-1.0Beta2.jar - To u

svn commit: r468962 - in /ant/core/trunk: docs/ docs/antlibs/ docs/antlibs/antunit/ docs/manual/ docs/manual/CoreTasks/ xdocs/ xdocs/antlibs/ xdocs/antlibs/antunit/

Author: bodewig Date: Sun Oct 29 11:49:44 2006 New Revision: 468962 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=468962 Log: AntUnit 1.0 Beta2 Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/antlibs/antunit/index.html ant/core/trunk/docs/antlibs/bindownload.html ant/core/trunk/docs/antlibs/proper.htm

people.apache.org/dist is missing files

Hi, while I copied the AntUnit files over I releazed that dist on people.apache.org must have been re-populated from an old backup, neither the .NET Antlib nor AntUnit were there. What's worse is that Ant 1.7.0 Beta 1 is the latest version available right now. Antoine, do you still have the file

[RESULT] [RE-VOTE] AntUnit 1.0 Beta 2 - passed

I'll publish the artifacts and update the site now and send the release annoincements out in about ten hours. Cheers Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A note on release votes

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This procedure for releases opens for me a number of questions : > > - does it not force the project to actually hold two votes, one to > choose a date to build a release candidate, the second to decide > whether this release

Re: [RE-VOTE] AntUnit 1.0 Beta 2

+0 Stuck with a load of non-os work :( - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RE-VOTE] AntUnit 1.0 Beta 2

Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, I've re-built AntUnit with -source 1.2 and uploaded everything to . I'd like to release those files as 1.0Beta2. Sorry, do not have the time to look at this at the moment, don't wait for me so: +0 Martijn ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40839] - fails with NPE when compiling with eclipse ecj 3.1.x

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu