Re: [VOTE] drop java 1.2 support in ant 1.7.1 and later

Martijn Kruithof wrote: Hi Because the discussion is coming up again, and I would like to have a clear result, here an official Vote request. Given the facts that 1) java 1.2 is EOL 2) java 1.2 is not supported by the official ant 1.7.0 delivery 3) the problems running java 1.2 on some newer

Re: [VOTE] drop java 1.2 support in ant 1.7.1 and later

+1 - drop java 1.2 for ant 1.7.1 Peter On 4/24/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Martijn Kruithof wrote: > Hi > > Because the discussion is coming up again, and I would like to have a > clear result, here an official Vote request. > > Given the facts that > 1) java 1.2 is EOL > 2) j

[Ant Wiki] Update of "Ant1.7.1/Planning" by XavierHanin

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ant Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by XavierHanin: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant1%2e7%2e1/Planning -- Java 1

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42208] - Move AntLib.createAntLib to use project helper reference for parsing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42219] New: - Inefficient code in Union, DirectoryScanner makes large copy tasks very slow

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42219] - Inefficient code in Union, DirectoryScanner makes large copy tasks very slow

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31170] - Add resolve task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Ant Wiki] Update of "Ant1.7.1/Planning" by SteveLoughran

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ant Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by SteveLoughran: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant1%2e7%2e1/Planning -- -a

Re: svn commit: r531340 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/launch/Locator.java

It occurs to me, Darin, that nobody would complain if you wanted to open a new issue and immediately close as fixed just for documentation's sake. -Matt --- Darin Swanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Kevin. > > I agree that it is a regression between 1.6.5 and > 1.7.0 > As well there is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42219] - Inefficient code in Union, DirectoryScanner makes large copy tasks very slow

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42219] - Inefficient code in Union, DirectoryScanner makes large copy tasks very slow

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42222] New: - Locator implementation not encoding URI strings properly: spaces in paths

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Jira

The fact that people are running automation experiments on bugzilla makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira. The way to do this is we file a bugrep with infrastructure pointing to a vote that made the decision. I think they can then import the entirety of the database in there,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42219] - Inefficient code in Union, DirectoryScanner makes large copy tasks very slow

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Ant Wiki] Update of "Ant1.7.1/Planning" by SteveLoughran

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ant Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by SteveLoughran: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant1%2e7%2e1/Planning The comment on the change is: ooh, its Vista EE

Re: [Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Jira

On 4/24/07, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira. [...] [] Yes, move to JIRA [X] No, stay with Bugzilla JIRA does not play nice with the email threading features of GMail, which is how I monitor the Ant forums, because it adds a

Re: [Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Jira

--- Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The fact that people are running automation > experiments on bugzilla > makes me think that now is a good time to move to > Jira. The way to do > this is we file a bugrep with infrastructure > pointing to a vote that > made the decision. I thin

Re: [Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Jira

GMail itself does not honour threading info. For each bug, I get two message threads - one with "NEW" and another with continuation. The thread is also broken in GMail, if the title is changed. There is no such problem in Thunderbird. Saying that Bugzilla works reasonably well and its open-sourc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42219] - Inefficient code in Union, DirectoryScanner makes large copy tasks very slow

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Jira

On 4/24/07, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GMail itself does not honour threading info. For each bug, I get two message threads - one with "NEW" and another with continuation. The thread is also broken in GMail, if the title is changed. There is no such problem in Thunderbird. Tr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42219] - Inefficient code in Union, DirectoryScanner makes large copy tasks very slow

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42219] - Inefficient code in Union, DirectoryScanner makes large copy tasks very slow

"No" for file permissions too? - Alexey. On 4/24/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESS

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42219] - Inefficient code in Union, DirectoryScanner makes large copy tasks very slow

For file permissions, I think we have to use refection to see if the file object supports the api. I do not think that we can use pure java to check the permissions (except by using exec hackery) for pre java 1.4. Peter On 4/24/07, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "No" for file per

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42219] - Inefficient code in Union, DirectoryScanner makes large copy tasks very slow

I think we should not limit supported features supported by modern Java while keeping backward compatibility with older versions. One way is to use reflection. Another is to provide an alternative implementation of some classes (FileResource) to be used with modern Java. The later is straightfo

Re: [VOTE] drop java 1.2 support in ant 1.7.1 and later

+1 to dropping support for Java 1.2 altogether as of now. Martijn Kruithof wrote: > > > [ ] Yes drop Java 1.2 support altogether as of now > [ ] No do not drop Java 1.2 support altogether as of now > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

Re: [Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Jira

Thunderbird threads Jira emails only sometimes. It looks like it does so when the emails have exactly the same subject line, typically when the ticket is updated. For other types of changes, such as work flow or logging of work, they will not appear in the same thread. I use Jira at work all the t

Re: [Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Jira

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The fact that people are running automation experiments on bugzilla > makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira. Other ASF projects have already dealt with JIRA spam, I don't see us getting away from this problem by swi

Re: [VOTE] drop java 1.2 support in ant 1.7.1 and later

+1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

Re: [Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Jira

On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The fact that people are running automation experiments on bugzilla makes me think that now is a good time to move to Jira. Accordinly, I would like to call a vote about moving to JIRA [] Yes, move to JIRA [] No, stay with Bugzill

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42225] New: - Single Quote in Password of sshexec Bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42227] New: - ant fails to include a build file when run from a dir containing spaces

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42227] - ant fails to include a build file when run from a dir containing spaces

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42227] - ant fails to include a build file when run from a dir containing spaces

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42227] - ant fails to include a build file when run from a dir containing spaces

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42227] - ant fails to include a build file when run from a dir containing spaces

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

JIRA/gmail threading (was: Re: [Vote] move defect tracking from bugzilla to Jira)

On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:56:53AM -0500, Dominique Devienne wrote: > On 4/24/07, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >GMail itself does not honour threading info. For each bug, I get two > >message > >threads - one with "NEW" and another with continuation. The thread is also > >broken

[Ant Wiki] Update of "Ant1.7.1/Planning" by JanMat èrne

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Ant Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JanMatèrne: http://wiki.apache.org/ant/Ant1%2e7%2e1/Planning -- -all

AW: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

[junit] Testcase: testFromURI(org.apache.tools.ant.util.FileUtilsTest): FAILED [junit] null expected: but was: [junit] junit.framework.ComparisonFailure: null expected: but was: and I thought it was only on my Win-machine ... Jan >-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > >Full details are availa