Yet an other view for target-group

The concept of target-group seems confusing for the moment. I would like to try to prpopose an other view to see if it bring more concensus. Instead of having one special type of target to define a new concept, maybe we need 2 : target-group and target-part. With the caracteristics that : * targ

Re: EasyAnt phases

2008/11/21 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2008-11-20, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 2008/11/20 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> On 2008-11-20, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - What about the if/unless? > >>> This would be pretty hard to implement

Re: Maybe we should open up "depends" for all targets

2008/11/21 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2008-11-20, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> target-group is-a target. A "plain target" is a target as opposed to >>> a target-group. > >> Since I h

Re: AntXtras + Ant 1.8 (unhappy duo apparently)

On 2008-11-12, Wascally Wabbit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you send me a "backlink" to the possible > incompatibilities and/or the breaking changes to the > current Ant code? I'm afraid there hasn't been too much discussion on the list (the best I can find is

Re: target-group committed

On 2008-11-21, Jean-Louis BOUDART <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Suppose you have a build with 10 target-group which represent 10 different > generic step of your build process (like compile / package/ test/ etc...) Then I'd consider this to be the public API and it. > And behind you have 30 subm

Re: EasyAnt phases

On 2008-11-20, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/11/20 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On 2008-11-20, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> - What about the if/unless? >> This would be pretty hard to implement as you saw yourself later on. >> What if the same target

Re: Maybe we should open up "depends" for all targets

On 2008-11-20, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> target-group is-a target. A "plain target" is a target as opposed to >> a target-group. > Since I have conceptualized them in my head as something differe