2008/11/21 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2008-11-20, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 2008/11/20 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> On 2008-11-20, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> - What about the if/unless? > >>> This would be pretty hard to implement as you saw yourself later on. >>> What if the same target is in the depends list of two different >>> target-groups? > >> What about making an 'or' between the conditions ? > > Is this really what would be intended? What if one target-group has > an if attribute while the other one has not, or if the have > contradicting attributes? > > Stefan
The idea is to plug a target into a target group. If a target is plugged into 2 target-group, and only one target group needs to be executed, then that target still needs to be executed to satisfy the execution of the other group. Concerning the conflict, we already have it with if and unless (it is just that they are closer). But I agree, it might be confusing. At least until we found a right view for the target and the target-group (something that I feel we don't have yet). -- Gilles Scokart --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
