On 2008-11-20, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> target-group is-a target. A "plain target" is a target as opposed to >> a target-group.
> Since I have conceptualized them in my head as something different > than targets, I forget that implementation-wise they remain targets. Not only implementation-wise, also in my head, conceptually. > I actually think it would be better if the code made them distinct > classes, possibly extracting an interface for the perform and > dependency getting parts, but that's a different story. From the > user and documentation perspective, the fact that a target-group is > a target under the cover should be de-emphasized IMHO. I wonder what sort of difference between target and target-group people see, I don't seem to get it, sorry. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
