Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
In the long run, if maven becomes better at solving some issues like the
release process (including the so called staged release process) we could
build, stage and release ant using maven.
what's the benefit ? for what purpose ?
the benefit would be to use
Hello Stephane,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:58:26 +0100
Von: Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Ant Developers List
Betreff: Re: Branch
> Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what I really have in mind is to setup an
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
what I really have in mind is to setup ant's source tree so that you can build
ant with maven with very simple POMs, which means one source tree per output
jar file. This would not prevent us from keeping our build system with
build.bat/build.sh bootstrap.bat/b
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what I really have in mind is to setup ant's source tree so that you
> can build ant with maven with very simple POMs, which means one
> source tree per output jar file.
I don't share this desire but won't stand in your way.
x27;s jars using maven, but our POMs are convoluted.
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 04:52:33 +1030
Von: "Stephen McConnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "\'Ant Developers List\'"
Betreff: RE: Branch
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like maybe
> > splitting the source tree per jar.
+1
>
> Why?
>
> Splitting the source tree by moving things to antlibs is
> fine, but why split the source tree
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also would prefer to wait a bit to create the ANT_17_BRANCH.
fine with me.
> For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like maybe splitting
> the source tree per jar.
Why?
Splitting the source tree by moving things to
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I also would prefer to wait a bit to create the
ANT_17_BRANCH.
For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like
maybe splitting the source tree per jar.
Documentation could also be split by theme such as
property
On 12/22/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
I also would prefer to wait a bit to create the ANT_17_BRANCH.
For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like maybe splitting the source
tree per jar.
I would prefer to remove the large number of jars.
The original reaso
--- Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I also would prefer to wait a bit to create the
> ANT_17_BRANCH.
>
> For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like
> maybe splitting the source tree per jar.
> Documentation could also be split by theme such as
> property task
lopers List
Betreff: Re: Branch
> Matt Benson schreef:
> > --- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
> >>
> >
> > Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining
&g
Matt Benson schreef:
--- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining
ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the
release. :) Should we wait on branching until nearer
to 1.7.1, or unti
--- Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining
ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the
release. :) Should we wait on branching until nearer
to 1.7.1, or until we know we want to put someth
13 matches
Mail list logo