Re: Branch

2007-01-09 Thread Steve Loughran
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: In the long run, if maven becomes better at solving some issues like the release process (including the so called staged release process) we could build, stage and release ant using maven. what's the benefit ? for what purpose ? the benefit would be to

Re: Branch

2007-01-08 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: what I really have in mind is to setup ant's source tree so that you can build ant with maven with very simple POMs, which means one source tree per output jar file. I don't share this desire but won't stand in your way. If

Re: Branch

2007-01-08 Thread Stephane Bailliez
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, what I really have in mind is to setup ant's source tree so that you can build ant with maven with very simple POMs, which means one source tree per output jar file. This would not prevent us from keeping our build system with build.bat/build.sh

Re: Branch

2007-01-08 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Hello Stephane, Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:58:26 +0100 Von: Stephane Bailliez [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Branch Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: Hi, what I really have in mind is to setup ant's source tree so

Re: RE: Branch

2006-12-28 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
using maven, but our POMs are convoluted. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 04:52:33 +1030 Von: Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: \'Ant Developers List\' dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: RE: Branch -Original Message- From: Stefan

Re: Branch

2006-12-27 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also would prefer to wait a bit to create the ANT_17_BRANCH. fine with me. For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like maybe splitting the source tree per jar. Why? Splitting the source tree by moving things to

RE: Branch

2006-12-27 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like maybe splitting the source tree per jar. +1 Why? Splitting the source tree by moving things to antlibs is fine, but why split the source tree of pieces

Re: Branch

2006-12-23 Thread Steve Loughran
Matt Benson wrote: --- Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I also would prefer to wait a bit to create the ANT_17_BRANCH. For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like maybe splitting the source tree per jar. Documentation could also be split by theme such as property

Re: Branch

2006-12-22 Thread Matt Benson
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH? Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the release. :) Should we wait on branching until nearer to 1.7.1, or until we know we want to put

Re: Branch

2006-12-22 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Matt Benson schreef: --- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH? Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the release. :) Should we wait on branching until nearer to 1.7.1, or until

Re: Branch

2006-12-22 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Branch Matt Benson schreef: --- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH? Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the release

Re: Branch

2006-12-22 Thread Matt Benson
is a pain. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:05:12 +0100 Von: Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Branch Matt Benson schreef: --- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Branch

2006-12-22 Thread Peter Reilly
PROTECTED] An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Betreff: Re: Branch Matt Benson schreef: --- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH? Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining ourselves from committing to HEAD just before