Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
In the long run, if maven becomes better at solving some issues like the
release process (including the so called staged release process) we could
build, stage and release ant using maven.
what's the benefit ? for what purpose ?
the benefit would be to
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what I really have in mind is to setup ant's source tree so that you
can build ant with maven with very simple POMs, which means one
source tree per output jar file.
I don't share this desire but won't stand in your way. If
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
what I really have in mind is to setup ant's source tree so that you can build
ant with maven with very simple POMs, which means one source tree per output
jar file. This would not prevent us from keeping our build system with
build.bat/build.sh
Hello Stephane,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:58:26 +0100
Von: Stephane Bailliez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Branch
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Hi,
what I really have in mind is to setup ant's source tree so
using maven, but our POMs are convoluted.
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 04:52:33 +1030
Von: Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: \'Ant Developers List\' dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Branch
-Original Message-
From: Stefan
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also would prefer to wait a bit to create the ANT_17_BRANCH.
fine with me.
For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like maybe splitting
the source tree per jar.
Why?
Splitting the source tree by moving things to
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like maybe
splitting the source tree per jar.
+1
Why?
Splitting the source tree by moving things to antlibs is
fine, but why split the source tree of pieces
Matt Benson wrote:
--- Antoine Levy-Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I also would prefer to wait a bit to create the
ANT_17_BRANCH.
For Ant 1.8, I have in mind some refactoring, like
maybe splitting the source tree per jar.
Documentation could also be split by theme such as
property
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining
ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the
release. :) Should we wait on branching until nearer
to 1.7.1, or until we know we want to put
Matt Benson schreef:
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining
ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the
release. :) Should we wait on branching until nearer
to 1.7.1, or until
List dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Branch
Matt Benson schreef:
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining
ourselves from committing to HEAD just before the
release
is a pain.
Regards,
Antoine
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:05:12 +0100
Von: Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Branch
Matt Benson schreef:
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
PROTECTED]
An: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Branch
Matt Benson schreef:
--- Martijn Kruithof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have we already created an ANT_17_BRANCH?
Not that I know of. We did pretty well restraining
ourselves from committing to HEAD just before
13 matches
Mail list logo