[api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-10-29 Thread Bernard Marcelly
Hello, This is not a problem, just an annoyance which could be avoided. I downloaded the Dev SDK for version 3.3, and run a grep tool on all IDL files, to find out which files contain the string : @since The following remarks are also valid for previous versions. For the latest version 3.3.0

[api-dev] Re: Some consistency in IDL please

2010-10-29 Thread Michael Stahl
On 29/10/2010 12:17, Bernard Marcelly wrote: Hello, This is not a problem, just an annoyance which could be avoided. I downloaded the Dev SDK for version 3.3, and run a grep tool on all IDL files, to find out which files contain the string : @since The following remarks are also valid

Re: [api-dev] Re: Some consistency in IDL please

2010-10-29 Thread Frank Schönheit
Hi Michael, @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 @since OOo 3.3 @since OOo 3.3.0 @since OOo3.3 @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 Please, API developers, could you stick to one rule ? :-) yes, that would indeed be a good idea :) can somebody (jsc?) please declare one of these as correct? In the past,

Re: [api-dev] Re: Some consistency in IDL please

2010-10-29 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 10/29/10 1:12 PM, Frank Schönheit wrote: Hi Michael, @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 @since OOo 3.3 @since OOo 3.3.0 @since OOo3.3 @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 Please, API developers, could you stick to one rule ? :-) yes, that would indeed be a good idea :) can somebody (jsc?) please

Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-10-29 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 10/29/10 12:17, Bernard Marcelly wrote: For the latest version 3.3.0 I found these variants, on various IDLs: @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 @since OOo 3.3 @since OOo 3.3.0 @since OOo3.3 @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 Please, API developers, could you stick to one rule ? :-)

Re: [api-dev] Re: Some consistency in IDL please

2010-10-29 Thread Frank Schönheit
Hi Jürgen, exactly the links back into the DevGuide are useful at least from my point of view. Sure, I didn't say they aren't useful. The question is whether we should evaluate how to replicate this functionality in doxygen. Using an existing source code documentation tool, and enhancing it

Re: [api-dev] Re: Some consistency in IDL please

2010-10-29 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 10/29/10 1:35 PM, Frank Schönheit wrote: Hi Jürgen, exactly the links back into the DevGuide are useful at least from my point of view. Sure, I didn't say they aren't useful. The question is whether we should evaluate how to replicate this functionality in doxygen. Using an existing

Re: [api-dev] Some consistency in IDL please

2010-10-29 Thread Jürgen Schmidt
On 10/29/10 1:21 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 10/29/10 12:17, Bernard Marcelly wrote: For the latest version 3.3.0 I found these variants, on various IDLs: @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 @since OOo 3.3 @since OOo 3.3.0 @since OOo3.3 @since OpenOffice.org 3.3 Please, API developers, could

Re: [api-dev] Attempt for an UNO Undo API

2010-10-29 Thread Mathias Bauer
On 10/28/2010 10:03 AM, Frank Schönheit wrote: Hi Mathias, I think that editing of OLE objects (and linked sheets are just a variant of them) should stay as they are: while you are editing the object, you might be able to undo parts of the editing, but after leaving the OLE object all changes