Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-26 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/26/2007 02:12 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Nov 15, 2007 4:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Please provide your input to release. > >>[ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1 > > diffs from prior release look reasonable (punted on reviewing Windows > build changes just as I normall

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-25 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Nov 15, 2007 4:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please provide your input to release. >[ +1] APR-iconv-1.2.1 diffs from prior release look reasonable (punted on reviewing Windows build changes just as I normally punt on testing them) I had to manually define API_U

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-25 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 11/20/2007 11:30 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please provide your input to release. [+1] APR-iconv-1.2.1 Please note I didn't see much feedback yet one way or another on APR-iconv-1.2.1 nor What can be done with APR-iconv, except

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-21 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/20/2007 11:30 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Please provide your input to release. >> >> [+1] APR-0.9.17 >> [+1] APR-1.2.12 >> [XX] APR-util-1.2.11 >> [+1] APR-iconv-1.2.1 > > Please note I've withdrawn apr-util-1.2.11 from consideration, and a > 1

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Please provide your input to release. [+1] APR-0.9.17 [+1] APR-1.2.12 [XX] APR-util-1.2.11 [+1] APR-iconv-1.2.1 Please note I've withdrawn apr-util-1.2.11 from consideration, and a 1.2.12 package test will be announced once I've copied up and synced. I'll

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-19 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 21:47 +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > I haven't commited for testdate so far. Yeah, sorry. I confused a patch sent to the list with a commit. I'll blame it on caffeine deficiency, although old age is more likely ;-) -- Bojan

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-19 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/19/2007 10:04 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Did you have a look at diffs between 1.2.x and trunk for apr_date.c? > > The 1.2.x branch is missing > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=233425 (combo of bug > fixes and support for a new date format and new testcases) > http://svn.a

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 11/19/2007 12:38 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: Both apr-0.9.17 and apr-1.2.12 fail SHM tests: 0.9.17: - starting consumer. starting producer. Name-based shared memory test FAILED: [2] No such file or directory Name-based shared memory test

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Nov 19, 2007 3:47 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 11/19/2007 12:38 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >> Please provide your input to release. > >> > >>[+1] APR-0.9.17 > >>[+1] APR-1.2.12 > >>[-1] APR-u

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-19 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/19/2007 12:38 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Please provide your input to release. >> >>[+1] APR-0.9.17 >>[+1] APR-1.2.12 >>[-1] APR-util-1.2.11 >>[ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1 > > Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64. > > Both apr

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-18 Thread Bojan Smojver
On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Please provide your input to release. > >[+1] APR-0.9.17 >[+1] APR-1.2.12 >[-1] APR-util-1.2.11 >[ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1 Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64. Both apr-0.9.17 and apr-1.2.12 fail SHM tests: 0.9.17: --

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Nov 15, 2007 4:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please provide your input to release. > >[ ] APR-0.9.17 >[+1] APR-1.2.12 >[+1] APR-util-1.2.11 >[ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1 Solaris 10/x86_64 Sun Studio 11 apr 1.2.11 vs. apr 1.2.12 tested in 32-bit and 64-bit

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-17 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Nov 15, 2007 6:19 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2007 11:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Please provide your input to release. > > Ubuntu 7.10 kernel 2.6.22-14, x86 > > testsock: //bin/ba

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-17 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/16/2007 10:44 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > On 11/15/2007 10:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Please provide your input to release. >> >> [+1] APR-0.9.17 >> [+1] APR-1.2.12 >> [-1] APR-util-1.2.11 >> [ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1 >> >> >> >> I've already noticed I should have scuttled

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-16 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/16/2007 10:44 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > Solaris 10: All OK except: > > testpoll: /Line 314: expected <5>, but saw <4> > FAILED 1 of 13 > testshm : -Line 254: Error destroying shared memory block (22): > Invalid argument > > FAILED 1 of 6 > Failed Tests

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-16 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 11/15/2007 10:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Please provide your input to release. > > [+1] APR-0.9.17 > [ ] APR-1.2.12 > [-1] APR-util-1.2.11 > [ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1 > > > > I've already noticed I should have scuttled testreslist current > implementation, > but that's 20/20

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-15 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Nov 16, 2007 1:19 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2007 11:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Please provide your input to release. > > Ubuntu 7.10 kernel 2.6.22-14, x86 > > > > Details: > > > >>[-1] A

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-15 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Nov 15, 2007 11:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please provide your input to release. Ubuntu 7.10 kernel 2.6.22-14, x86 > >[+1] APR-0.9.17 >[-1] APR-1.2.12 >[-1] APR-util-1.2.11 >[+1] APR-iconv-1.2.1 -- I only built it! aren't there any tests for this? >

Re: [Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote: On Nov 15, 2007 11:26 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please provide your input to release. Ubuntu 7.10 kernel 2.6.22-14, x86 Details: [-1] APR-1.2.12 on the first run: testshm : FAILED 1 of 6 Correct; this is not a regressi

[Votes] Apr candidates in /dev/dist/

2007-11-15 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Please provide your input to release. [ ] APR-0.9.17 [ ] APR-1.2.12 [ ] APR-util-1.2.11 [ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1 I've already noticed I should have scuttled testreslist current implementation, but that's 20/20 hindsight and it sure isn't a showstopper.