I take back what I said about Check being GPL, it is LGPL now. That
means that our tests wouldn't be infected by the GPL license.
Are there any thoughts on either of these? I have already submitted my
first set of patches to CuTest, so it will compile with gcc as soon as
they are accepted. I'll
Ryan Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Check is a lot more than two files, and the port to Windows could be
> kind of tough. The problem is that it requires fork() for a lot of what
> it does, and although I haven't looked at the code in great depth, the
> parts I have looked at just look very U
> From: Ryan Bloom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 July 2002 16:06
> Okay, I have looked at two different test suite options.
>
> 1) Check -- GPL licensed. Doesn't work on Windows.
> http://check.sourceforge.net/
>
> 2) CuTest -- Zlib license. Doesn't currently work on Unix, but I
> > Okay, I have looked at two different test suite options.
> >
> > 1) Check -- GPL licensed. Doesn't work on Windows.
> > http://check.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > 2) CuTest -- Zlib license. Doesn't currently work on Unix, but I
> > have patches already. I'll be submitting them later today
"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why don't you take a look at the test framework that was cooked up
> in subversion?
>
> http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/subversion/tests/
>
> It is currently only used for subversion, but I think you will be able
> to leverage that code wi
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 09 July 2002 16:47
> "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Why don't you take a look at the test framework that was cooked up
> > in subversion?
> >
> > http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/subversion/tests/
> >
> > I
esday, July 09, 2002 9:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dev@apr.apache.org
> Subject: RE: New Test Suite
>
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 09 July 2002 16:47
>
> > "Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECT
"Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rather than add features to a test suite that isn't meant to be a full
> test suite, I would rather add features to a project that is trying to
> be a full test suite. After discussing this with Ben Collins-Sussman on
> the svn IRC channel this morning,
