Re: uh, let's finally release 1.4.2 and 1.3.12

2010-03-11 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:36 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/19/2010 11:09 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> That's a good solution. > > Just an observation, we should probably duplicate for a day while mirrors > pick up the 1.x and then remove the old 1.3/1.4 files. > > And did we want to menti

Re: uh, let's finally release 1.4.2 and 1.3.12

2010-02-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Suggestion that I started locally in-tree when you first pointed this out; > > We rename the file to APR-Announce-1.x.txt I stuck the "1.x" into the old AnnouncementM.N.ext template, which has the nice property of appearing near the t

Re: uh, let's finally release 1.4.2 and 1.3.12

2010-02-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 1:36 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/19/2010 11:09 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> That's a good solution. > > Just an observation, we should probably duplicate for a day while mirrors > pick up the 1.x and then remove the old 1.3/1.4 files. yeah > And did we want to

Re: uh, let's finally release 1.4.2 and 1.3.12

2010-02-19 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/19/2010 11:09 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > That's a good solution. Just an observation, we should probably duplicate for a day while mirrors pick up the 1.x and then remove the old 1.3/1.4 files. And did we want to mention the 'improvements' offered in 1.4 for developers in the final 1.4.2 a

Re: uh, let's finally release 1.4.2 and 1.3.12

2010-02-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 2/19/2010 5:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> nice-to-haves: >>>  Win32 source flavor of release tarballs, for both 1.4.2 and 1.3.12 >> >> I guess I'm waiting for Bill to say "go

Re: uh, let's finally release 1.4.2 and 1.3.12

2010-02-19 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 2/19/2010 5:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> nice-to-haves: >> Win32 source flavor of release tarballs, for both 1.4.2 and 1.3.12 > > I guess I'm waiting for Bill to say "go ahead without them" or "I'm > trying to get caught up". All of the

Re: uh, let's finally release 1.4.2 and 1.3.12

2010-02-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > nice-to-haves: >  Win32 source flavor of release tarballs, for both 1.4.2 and 1.3.12 I guess I'm waiting for Bill to say "go ahead without them" or "I'm trying to get caught up". > see site updates in attachment (generated html not included)

uh, let's finally release 1.4.2 and 1.3.12

2010-02-15 Thread Jeff Trawick
nice-to-haves: Win32 source flavor of release tarballs, for both 1.4.2 and 1.3.12 see site updates in attachment (generated html not included) basic theme is that 1.4.2-is-the-best-apr but acknowledge 1.3.12 as a bug fix release for the 1.3 series AFAICT apr 1.3.9/apr-util-1.3.9 were the last