Thanks for writing this.
I agree. That is a good decision tree. +1
Best,
Jorge
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 6:08 PM Micah Kornfield
wrote:
> The discussion around adding another interval type to the Schema.fbs raises
> the issue of when do we decide to add a new type to the Schema.fbs vs using
>
Congrats Jonathan!
> On Apr 28, 2021, at 5:20 PM, David Li wrote:
>
> Congrats Jonathan!
>
> -David
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, at 16:55, Jorge Cardoso Leitão wrote:
>> Congratulations and thank you for your contributions :)
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:37 PM Neal Richardson <
>>
Congrats Ian!
> On Apr 28, 2021, at 7:01 PM, paddy horan wrote:
>
> Congrats Ian!
>
>
>
> From: Jorge Cardoso Leit?o
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 4:56:12 PM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Ian Cook
>
>
Hello,
For Arrow Datasets, I've been working to instrument the scanner to find
bottlenecks. For example, here's a demo comparing the current async
scanner, which doesn't truly read asynchronously, to one that does; it
should be fairly evident where the bottleneck is:
Thanks for the context. I'll be posting later today so I'd appreciate
any feedback you have there as well.
I agree with the caveat about bridging C++<->Python. I don't think
this is accounted for upstream, IIRC the best you can do is ship a
span context across the FFI boundary, and otherwise just
Thanks for the response David. That proposal sounds exactly what I'm
looking for in terms of middleware.
My motivation for tracing comes from previously working within a complex
real time orchestration system with 20+ microservices involved in creating
various features per request in the system.
Hey Eric,
It so happens that I am literally in the middle of drafting a proposal
to the mailing list to integrate with OpenTelemetry on the C++
level. I would fully support having these capabilities for Flight, and
I think in the past we've discussed having a contrib directory for
such modules,
Is there currently any interest or effort underway in providing reusable
Flight middleware for observability and production usage (e.g. logging,
tracing, metrics)?
For my own usage and experimentation I created a very basic json logging
and OpenTracing implementation, but I was wondering if there
Congrats!
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:35 AM Rok Mihevc wrote:
> Congrats Jonathan!
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 6:10 PM Mauricio Vargas <
> mauri...@ursacomputing.com>
> wrote:
>
> > congrats !!
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:47 AM Daniël Heres
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Congrats!
> > >
> > > Op wo
Congrats!
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 10:35 AM Rok Mihevc wrote:
> Congrats Ian!
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 9:46 AM Daniël Heres
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats!
> >
> > Op do 29 apr. 2021 om 01:08 schreef paddy horan >:
> >
> > > Congrats Ian!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
Congrats Ian!
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 9:46 AM Daniël Heres wrote:
> Congrats!
>
> Op do 29 apr. 2021 om 01:08 schreef paddy horan :
>
> > Congrats Ian!
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Jorge Cardoso Leit?o
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 4:56:12 PM
> > To:
Congrats Jonathan!
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 6:10 PM Mauricio Vargas
wrote:
> congrats !!
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:47 AM Daniël Heres
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats!
> >
> > Op wo 28 apr. 2021 om 23:21 schreef David Li :
> >
> > > Congrats Jonathan!
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 28,
congrats !!
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 3:47 AM Daniël Heres wrote:
> Congrats!
>
> Op wo 28 apr. 2021 om 23:21 schreef David Li :
>
> > Congrats Jonathan!
> >
> > -David
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, at 16:55, Jorge Cardoso Leitão wrote:
> > > Congratulations and thank you for your contributions
The discussion around adding another interval type to the Schema.fbs raises
the issue of when do we decide to add a new type to the Schema.fbs vs using
other means (primarily extension types [1]).
A few criteria come to mind that could help decide (feedback welcome):
1. Is the type a new
When in doubt, return to the format versioning policy:
https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/Versioning.html
The interval type addition is a MINOR version increase in the format
version. As a result of the forward compatibility policy, old readers are
expected to be able to recognize when they
Arrow Build Report for Job nightly-2021-04-29-0
All tasks:
https://github.com/ursacomputing/crossbow/branches/all?query=nightly-2021-04-29-0
Failed Tasks:
- conda-linux-gcc-py36-arm64:
URL:
Le 29/04/2021 à 02:26, Weston Pace a écrit :
There is also a potential format change coming up (new interval type).
Ok, so more accurately, it is not a format change, it's a format
addition ;-)
This sounds pedantic but a format change would potentially break
compatibility (for example
Le 29/04/2021 à 02:26, Weston Pace a écrit :
We now have independent releases. There has been some discussion (not
sure if it was formalized) around aligning major release versions
across the languages.
There is also a potential format change coming up (new interval type).
I think this
Ok, so it sounds less like a "library" dependency and more like the
relationship between C++ specification and compiler or between browser
features and browsers. Does an implementation have to implement the
1.0 spec before implementing features in the 1.1 spec? I would assume
no. Given that we
Congrats!
Op do 29 apr. 2021 om 01:08 schreef paddy horan :
> Congrats Ian!
>
>
>
> From: Jorge Cardoso Leit?o
> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 4:56:12 PM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Arrow committer: Ian Cook
>
> Congratulations
Congrats!
Op wo 28 apr. 2021 om 23:21 schreef David Li :
> Congrats Jonathan!
>
> -David
>
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, at 16:55, Jorge Cardoso Leitão wrote:
> > Congratulations and thank you for your contributions :)
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:37 PM Neal Richardson <
> >
21 matches
Mail list logo
