This vote passes (+8 binding / +3 non-binding). I've created
ARROW-13218 and started a PR [1] to tackle both this vote and the
other vote (regarding instants). The PR will need to wait until the
other vote settles to be merged but I'd appreciate any comments /
refinements in the meantime.
[1]
+1
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 7:47 PM Julian Hyde wrote:
> +1
>
> > On Jun 25, 2021, at 10:36 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 24/06/2021 à 21:16, Weston Pace a écrit :
> >> The discussion in [1] led to the following proposal which I would like
> >> to submit for a vote.
> >> ---
> >>
+1
> On Jun 25, 2021, at 10:36 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>
> Le 24/06/2021 à 21:16, Weston Pace a écrit :
>> The discussion in [1] led to the following proposal which I would like
>> to submit for a vote.
>> ---
>> Arrow allows a timestamp column to omit the time zone property. This
>> has
Le 24/06/2021 à 21:16, Weston Pace a écrit :
The discussion in [1] led to the following proposal which I would like
to submit for a vote.
---
Arrow allows a timestamp column to omit the time zone property. This
has caused confusion because some people have interpreted a timestamp
without a
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 3:53 PM David Li wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, at 08:30, Jonathan Keane wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > -Jon
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 5:30 AM Rok Mihevc wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:21 AM Eduardo
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021, at 08:30, Jonathan Keane wrote:
> +1
>
> -Jon
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 5:30 AM Rok Mihevc wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:21 AM Eduardo Ponce wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 4:31 AM
+1
-Jon
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 5:30 AM Rok Mihevc wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:21 AM Eduardo Ponce wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 4:31 AM Joris Peeters
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:29 AM Joris Van
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 11:21 AM Eduardo Ponce wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 4:31 AM Joris Peeters
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:29 AM Joris Van den Bossche <
> > jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 4:31 AM Joris Peeters
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:29 AM Joris Van den Bossche <
> jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 21:21, Micah Kornfield
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun
+1
On Fri, Jun 25, 2021 at 9:29 AM Joris Van den Bossche <
jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 21:21, Micah Kornfield
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:17 PM Weston Pace
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The discussion in [1] led to the
+1
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 21:21, Micah Kornfield wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:17 PM Weston Pace
> wrote:
>
> > The discussion in [1] led to the following proposal which I would like
> > to submit for a vote.
> >
> > ---
> > Arrow allows a timestamp column to omit the
+1 (binding)
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:17 PM Weston Pace wrote:
> The discussion in [1] led to the following proposal which I would like
> to submit for a vote.
>
> ---
> Arrow allows a timestamp column to omit the time zone property. This
> has caused confusion because some people have
The discussion in [1] led to the following proposal which I would like
to submit for a vote.
---
Arrow allows a timestamp column to omit the time zone property. This
has caused confusion because some people have interpreted a timestamp
without a time zone to be an Instant while others have
13 matches
Mail list logo
