RE: [PROPOSAL] Upgrade Cassandra driver from 3.x to 4.x in CassandraIO

Hi All, Satwik and myself have been working together on this. 4.x has been a major revamp and we have highlighted below major differences that were seen during this activity. Please review and provide feedback. 1. Package names : 3.x : com.datastax.cassandra 4.x : com.datastax.oss Comment

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.29.0, release candidate #1

At this point, the release train has just about come around to 2.30.0 which will pick up that change. I don't think it makes sense to cherry-pick anything more into 2.29.0 unless it is nonfunctional. As it is, I think we have a good commit and just need to build the expected artifacts. Since it isn

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.29.0, release candidate #1

Any chance we could include https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14548? On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:54 PM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > To clarify: I am running and fixing the release scripts on the `master` > branch. They work from fresh clones of the RC tag so this should work in > most cases. The exc

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.29.0, release candidate #1

To clarify: I am running and fixing the release scripts on the `master` branch. They work from fresh clones of the RC tag so this should work in most cases. The exception is the GitHub Actions configuration, which I cherrypicked to the release branch. Kenn On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:34 PM Kenneth

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.29.0, release candidate #1

OK it sounds like I need to re-roll the artifacts in question. I don't think anything raised here indicates a problem with the tagged commit, but with the state of the release scripts at the time I built the earlier artifacts. On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:03 PM Robert Bradshaw wrote: > It looks lik

Flaky test issue report

This is your daily summary of Beam's current flaky tests. These are P1 issues because they have a major negative impact on the community and make it hard to determine the quality of the software. BEAM-12163: Python GHA PreCommits flake with grpc.FutureTimeoutError on SDK harness startup (ht

P1 issues report

This is your daily summary of Beam's current P1 issues, not including flaky tests. See https://beam.apache.org/contribute/jira-priorities/#p1-critical for the meaning and expectations around P1 issues. BEAM-12174: Samza Portable Runner Support (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-12

Re: Naming! Dataflow Worker/SDK "Harness" image flag

+1 to shorter flags without unnecessary words On Mon, Apr 19, 2021, 3:19 PM Robert Bradshaw wrote: > I commented on the doc, but I'm also in favor of dropping "harness." > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:10 PM Tyson Hamilton wrote: > >> I'm in favor of dropping "harness" and going with "sdk_contain

Re: Naming! Dataflow Worker/SDK "Harness" image flag

I commented on the doc, but I'm also in favor of dropping "harness." On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 3:10 PM Tyson Hamilton wrote: > I'm in favor of dropping "harness" and going with "sdk_container_image". I > don't feel like the word "harness" adds value or clarity. > > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:34 AM

Re: Naming! Dataflow Worker/SDK "Harness" image flag

I'm in favor of dropping "harness" and going with "sdk_container_image". I don't feel like the word "harness" adds value or clarity. On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 11:34 AM Emily Ye wrote: > Hi all, > > *tl;dr*: keep harness in user-facing container image flag names? > > I have a few PRs in-progress fo

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.29.0, release candidate #1

It looks like the wheels are also versioned "2.29.0.dev". Not sure if it's important, but the source tarball also seems to contain some release script changes that are not reflected in the github branch. On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:41 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > Thanks for the details, Valentyn &

Naming! Dataflow Worker/SDK "Harness" image flag

Hi all, *tl;dr*: keep harness in user-facing container image flag names? I have a few PRs in-progress for "renaming" the workerHarnessContainerImage flag, i.e. adding a new flag and marking the old flag as deprecated. This is being done to better reflect the Portable framework.. I wanted to creat

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.29.0, release candidate #1

Thanks for the details, Valentyn & Cham. I will fix the Dataflow worker containers then update this thread. Kenn On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:36 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:42 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold > wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 4:02 AM Kenneth Knowles wro

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.29.0, release candidate #1

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:42 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 4:02 AM Kenneth Knowles wrote: > > > The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: > > * JIRA release notes [1], > > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to dist.apache

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.29.0, release candidate #1

I tried running Python quickstart using the validation script but seems like it fails due to picking the wrong version (2.28.0). https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/14574 https://ci-beam.apache.org/job/beam_P

Beam Dependency Check Report (2021-04-19)

High Priority Dependency Updates Of Beam Python SDK: Dependency Name Current Version Latest Version Release Date Of the Current Used Version Release Date Of The Latest Release JIRA Issue chromedriver-binary 88.0.4324.96.0 90.0.44