OK it sounds like I need to re-roll the artifacts in question. I don't
think anything raised here indicates a problem with the tagged commit, but
with the state of the release scripts at the time I built the earlier
artifacts.

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:03 PM Robert Bradshaw <rober...@google.com> wrote:

> It looks like the wheels are also versioned "2.29.0.dev".
>
> Not sure if it's important, but the source tarball also seems to contain
> some release script changes that are not reflected in the github branch.
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:41 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the details, Valentyn & Cham. I will fix the Dataflow worker
>> containers then update this thread.
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:36 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:42 AM Elliotte Rusty Harold <
>>> elh...@ibiblio.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 4:02 AM Kenneth Knowles <k...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > The complete staging area is available for your review, which
>>>> includes:
>>>> > * JIRA release notes [1],
>>>> > * the official Apache source release to be deployed to
>>>> dist.apache.org [2], which is signed with the key with fingerprint
>>>> 03DBA3E6ABDD04BFD1558DC16ED551A8AE02461C [3],
>>>> > * all artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central Repository [4],
>>>> > * source code tag "v2.29.0-RC1" [5],
>>>> > * website pull request listing the release [6], publishing the API
>>>> reference manual [7], and the blog post [8].
>>>> > * Java artifacts were built with Maven MAVEN_VERSION and
>>>> OpenJDK/Oracle JDK JDK_VERSION.
>>>>
>>>> Are the MAVEN_VERSION and OpenJDK/Oracle JDK JDK_VERSION supposed to
>>>> be filled in with numbers?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I missed that these were variables to be replaced.
>>>
>>> JDK_VERSION=8u181 (1.8) and the Gradle version is taken from the gradlew
>>> config so no need to include in the template, but it is 6.8
>>>
>>> Kenn
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Elliotte Rusty Harold
>>>> elh...@ibiblio.org
>>>>
>>>

Reply via email to